US Murders 60+ Civilians in Syria >:(

Maybe the US should get the f u c k out of Syria. Maybe the US should cease and desist intervening in the internal matters of foreign countries.

July 20th, 2016: “We have now have momentum in this fight and clear results on the ground,” said Secretary of Defense Ash Carter from Joint Base Andrews, Maryland on Wednesday. He said the US with coalition forces have made plans to deliver IS a lasting defeat.

Here that everyone? We're winning. We're always winning. Every day. Winning, winning, winning...

xDeaths-from-Terrorism-2000-2014_branded1.png.pagespeed.ic_.3QHOqb3iZe.png
 
July 20th, 2016: “We have now have momentum in this fight and clear results on the ground,” said Secretary of Defense Ash Carter from Joint Base Andrews, Maryland on Wednesday. He said the US with coalition forces have made plans to deliver IS a lasting defeat.

Here that everyone? We're winning. We're always winning. Every day. Winning, winning, winning...

xDeaths-from-Terrorism-2000-2014_branded1.png.pagespeed.ic_.3QHOqb3iZe.png

Jesus Christ, I can't believe the number for Nigeria is that high and I am traveling back in couple of months :(
 
July 20th, 2016: “We have now have momentum in this fight and clear results on the ground,” said Secretary of Defense Ash Carter from Joint Base Andrews, Maryland on Wednesday. He said the US with coalition forces have made plans to deliver IS a lasting defeat.

Here that everyone? We're winning. We're always winning. Every day. Winning, winning, winning...

xDeaths-from-Terrorism-2000-2014_branded1.png.pagespeed.ic_.3QHOqb3iZe.png

Note that only about three percent of those attacks/ deaths were in Western countries including the US.
 
What was the point? That barrel bombs are better than "smart" weapons?

For a military without unlimited resources, they are a lot cheaper. A suicide bomber might be more precise too, being they are up close to the enemy. Launching smart weapons from half the world away requires intelligence usually from troops on the ground.
 
What was the point? That barrel bombs are better than "smart" weapons?

I think what Danke is trying to say is that with their ground intelligence and their familiarity with the enemy, the dumb barrel bombs can be smarter and more precise than the "smart" bombs at killing terrorists. Also, do you not think that the terrorists would not try to position themselves with civilians? that way, no matter what bomb you use, there would be civilian casualties.

This is war folks, no matter how you fight it, civilians will get hurt. My problem is when a party who is responsible for the war, a party whose efforts are not welcomed by the natives and govt in the country is out there dropping bombs and killing civilians.
 
Both require good intelligence to hit your target with minimal collateral damage. But smart weapons can be better controlled. Barrel bombs are intended as terror weapons- not as precision ones. A wide damage area is part of its design. You can try to hit a certain block in a city with it while a smart weapon can hit a particular corner of a building if you want. Both kill. Both targets and innocents.
 
Last edited:
Both require good intelligence to hit your target with minimal collateral damage. But smart weapons can be better controlled. Barrel bombs are intended as terror weapons- not as precision ones. A wide damage area is part of its design. You can try to hit a certain block in a city with it while a smart weapon can hit a particular corner of a building if you want. Both kill.

How are they less accurate than smart bombs? you need to see these bombs in action to understand how they work. Essentially, they carry the bomb with a helicopter on top of he area where they want to hit and then they drop the bomb. It cannot really get anymore accurate than it is already is. The problem is not really about its accuracy but the fact that there are civilians in its target.

Also, are you saying, armies should only use small bombs with small area of effect? The sad truth is that, civilians will have to die in order to end this war.
 
Yes, people are dying. "US kills 20" ignores the other thousands also being killed- if one is trying to make a moral argument. Have barrel bombs been contributing to the end of the Syrian war? (I don't claim US efforts are helping either- they aren't).

 
How are they less accurate than smart bombs? you need to see these bombs in action to understand how they work. Essentially, they carry the bomb with a helicopter on top of he area where they want to hit and then they drop the bomb. It cannot really get anymore accurate than it is already is. The problem is not really about its accuracy but the fact that there are civilians in its target.

Also, are you saying, armies should only use small bombs with small area of effect? The sad truth is that, civilians will have to die in order to end this war.

I would say a messy barrel bomb loaded with rusty nails and battery acid being used by a legitimate regime defending its territory is more accurate than GPS guided smart bombs painted by drone operators with HD cameras used by a foreign power trying to illegally dispose of the former.

But that's none of my business.

But-Thats-None-Of-My-Business.jpg
 
I would say a messy barrel bomb loaded with rusty nails and battery acid being used by a legitimate regime defending its territory is more accurate than GPS guided smart bombs painted by drone operators with HD cameras used by a foreign power trying to illegally dispose of the former.

But that's none of my business.

Obviously, you can't waste your good nails on filthy terrorists but why use battery acid? its not flammable and the chemical might react during the combustion to create something that is not even corrosive. I will fill my barrel bomb first with things that increase the blast radius and then with things that hurt people like rusty nails not something that may or may not end up burning your skin
 
Obviously, you can't waste your good nails on filthy terrorists but why use battery acid? its not flammable and the chemical might react during the combustion to create something that is not even corrosive. I will fill my barrel bomb first with things that increase the blast radius and then with things that hurt people like rusty nails not something that may or may not end up burning your skin

I guess I thought it sounded cool. I had thought about some biological agent but that seemed unecessarily cruel.

I'm open to suggestions.
 
Yes, people are dying. "US kills 20" ignores the other thousands also being killed- if one is trying to make a moral argument. Have barrel bombs been contributing to the end of the Syrian war? (I don't claim US efforts are helping either- they aren't).



The wailing from the people in the video tell me that the bomb hit the target. Keep bombing guys
 
I guess I thought it sounded cool. I had thought about some biological agent but that seemed unecessarily cruel.

I'm open to suggestions.

I think they already have all the good stuff in the barrel bomb. The victims of it and yes some are civilians don't look too good coming out of the bast. I wish there was a different way to end this war faster but these bombs are effective at destroying their dens.
 
The wailing from the people in the video tell me that the bomb hit the target. Keep bombing guys

Excellent idea! It will encourage even more people to become radical terrorists because their homes were destroyed and families killed.
 
Back
Top