US goes to war with Iran

[nikcers]

I'm seeing it. I've posted vids of the condition Tel Aviv is in.

Nuttyyahoo fucked around and all of Israel found out. This is what happens when you elect a psycho.

Well the damages to Israel amounts to property theft.

Just like the damages to Rand Paul amounts to property theft. His lung damage his health and his quality of life all have a value.

He then used the power of the sovereign our state which is our shared sovereignty the law to force his neighbor to sell his house and give Rand Paul the money.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Just because Rand Paul may have wanted his neighbor to give him his house doesn't mean he provoked his neighbor into attacking him so that he could take his house.

This is just a terrorist mentality where they get to bomb the shit out of Israel with no reprisal because they believe they have a right to take Israel's house.

 

[nikcers]

Yeah that's called justice.

You attack Israel and kill their people and damage their quality of life you pay a price.

We did the same thing with Germany. We put reparations on them after World War 1 and they paid the price.

The Ottoman empire ruled that region and they fought on the same side of Germany.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Yeah that's called justice.

You attack Israel and kill their people and damage their quality of life you pay a price.

We did the same thing with Germany. We put reparations on them after World War 1 and they paid the price.

The Ottoman empire ruled that region and they fought on the same side of Germany.

No one believes your spin and lies.

We get it. You hate mooslims and worship Israel. You don't have to repeat yourself ad-nauseum. No one cares.

 

[nikcers]

No one believes your spin and lies.

We get it. You hate mooslims and worship Israel. You don't have to repeat yourself ad-nauseum. No one cares.

I dont care what religion you follow.

If you attack the financial capital of my country you pay a cost.

Thats because this is the country I rule. It belongs to me. I RULE IT BECAUSE WE HAVE THE GUNS.

If you hold a gun and I hold a gun, we can talk about the law. If you hold a knife and I hold a knife, we can talk about rules. If you come empty handed and I come empty handed, we can talk about reason. But if you have a gun, and I only have a knife, then the truth lies in your hands.

 

[acptulsa]

I RULE IT BECAUSE WE HAVE THE GUNS.

Well, its obviously programmed to act like a chained dog. But I wonder if it acts like the majority of them? You know. The ones that skulk away the moment they're released from the chain?

 

[nikcers]

Well, its obviously programmed to act like a chained dog. But I wonder if it acts like the majority of them? You know. The ones that skulk away the moment they're released from the chain?

 

[unknown]

 

[unknown]

Strategic provocation and the October 7th attack

It's even more straightforward.

Hamas has been funded and armed, if not created, by Izrael.

Like ISIS and Alqaeda, Hamas is controlled opposition.



Izrael, at minimum, was fully aware of the pending attack.

And allowed it to continue uninterrupted for 9 hours.



Izraelis have openly accused the Netanyahu government of involvement in the attacks.

To the point that the Izraeli government has now made it illegal to do so.

No one was "denying" the attacks, they were screaming inside job.



Prior to the takeover of TikTok, countless videos like this had been uploaded.

They've now been scrubbed.

 

[nikcers]

So the Senate voted against the War Powers Resolution the democrats submitted on a near partyline vote 53 votes.

Which means there is defacto senate consent. Its no longer solely an executive action.

 

[unknown]

 

[nikcers]

Britain and France were the most powerful empires 100 years ago and they destabilized the middle east.

The USA didn't have any real power to shape the world order because the USA didn't enter the war until just before it ended so they had no influence at the peace tables.

The USA only got a seat at the peace table after World War 2 but after that conflict Russia destabilized the middle east for over 50 years to try to overthrow every country in the region and create client states.

Iraq was a client state of Russia and they armed Saddam and their vast armies that destabilized the region.

When the USA put sanctions on Iraq Russia kept Saddam in power by helping him bypass sanctions and buy military equipment.

This was after they invaded Afghanistan and created a civil war that ruined Afghanistan's economy and caused millions to starve so they could try to install a client state.

 

[TheTexan]

No matter how unsavory the parties are to a given dispute, does that change the essential facts of a case?

Not if they're both extremely unsavory.

As I've said before, if the Arabs were to give up their claims to Jerusalem, and just ask "to be left alone", to be an independent nation in peace, that would change the equation entirely. But that's not what they've done and that's not what they want.

Do we believe in property rights? Is property theft acceptable? How about compensation?

To the extent that land has been stolen, then they do deserve compensation. But you don't exactly get to launch rockets from a piece of land, and then claim the land is stolen when you get evicted from that land.

And then for propaganda purposes, it gets combined with collective guilt. Some person or group on one side kills some people on the other side. It is then considered collective guilt of all of the people on a given side. It goes both ways. Is every Israeli citizen guilty of the actions of the Netanyahu government? Is every resident of Gaza guilty of the crimes of Hamas murderers? Are people still individuals?

Neither side of this conflict treats the other as individuals. They should and they don't. They're both garbage people.

Both sides kill innocent people.

Are there good Israelis? Probably.

Are there good Arabs in palestine? Probably.

Are they still mostly garbage people on the whole? Yep, they are.

Let's look at a simple analogy. If that is true, are all of the people who have supported the actions of Luigi Mangione (who assassinated the CEO of United Healthcare) also guilty of murder? How about his fan clubs? What law can be applied, and successfully prosecuted, to make anybody who has supported him, or his actions, guilty of a crime?

They're guilty of murder if they voted for and provided support to Luigi knowing he would do that and in support of that, yea.

And if the CEO's family or anybody else felt compelled to kill them to stop them from murdering anyone else, I wouldn't really have much opposition to that.

But in reality noone voted for Luigi and provided support to Luigi to do it, so that's where your analogy breaks down.

Some people in government would like to make any speech or protests that favor Gaza illegal. On the other hand, should speech in support of killing people by a government be criminal?

Speech by itself shouldn't be illegal. But that's not what this is about. The people in Gaza actively vote for, fund and support the activities of Hamas, in addition to their speech indicating approval of their activities.

 

[ClaytonB]

"If you want to know who America's next enemy will be, just look at who we're funding today." - Dave Smith

 

[nikcers]

"If you want to know who America's next enemy will be, just look at who we're funding today." - Dave Smith

ISIS wasn't created to go fight the Islamic revolution and expansion of the new persian religious empire. They were a response to the Islamic revolution that Russia created because it was a response to global communism that Russia was using to take over the Middle East.

Russia starts civil wars in countrys and then invades them when they are weakened and conquers them.

The USA toppled Saddam's dictatorship that Russia armed and propped up in order to achieve the objective of ruling the entire region and changing the post cold war status quo so they can enslave other countries like they did as the Soviet Empire where the region of Moscow ruled the other Soviet regions as slaves.

 

[Snowball]

Britain and France were the most powerful empires 100 years ago and they destabilized the middle east.

The USA didn't have any real power to shape the world order because the USA didn't enter the war until just before it ended so they had no influence at the peace tables.

The USA only got a seat at the peace table after World War 2 but after that conflict Russia destabilized the middle east for over 50 years to try to overthrow every country in the region and create client states.

Iraq was a client state of Russia and they armed Saddam and their vast armies that destabilized the region.

When the USA put sanctions on Iraq Russia kept Saddam in power by helping him bypass sanctions and buy military equipment.

This was after they invaded Afghanistan and created a civil war that ruined Afghanistan's economy and caused millions to starve so they could try to install a client state.

You get a lot wrong. The regime change op in Afghanistan started with Zbigniew Brzezinski and the Pentagon and CIA inculcating what was before AL-Queda, the Mujahideen. They were powerful with US support in the effort to strip away Afghanistan form the Soviet sphere. Russia's invasion was a response to this threat from its south. Just like Russia will defend Iran if push comes to shove. Brzezinski went there and there are many photographs. He was like McCain and Graham, just decades before, with a different opponent on his "global chessboard" - Bolshevik Communism.

Britain and France did not de-stablize the Middle East, it was working as well as possible. What de-stabilized the Middle East was the Zoinist Project - and the British may be blamed to some extent for being its sponsor - but thet were also quite naive and did not forsee just how sociopathic and predatory the Zionist Entity would become, even terrorizing and murdering top British officers and statesmen.

This is why the Windsors never went there and have never been friendly with "Israel". Concerning the US motivation in dealings with Iraq, and Syria, and others like Khadaffi, it was against the strong, secular governments, because Pan-Arabism and Pan-Africanism were going to become successful and create superstates that could challenge "Israel" for regional supremacy. Just like Kennedy supported Nasser in Egypt.

Good luck on your learning journey. You should try and speak less enphatically about things you don't know.

 

[nikcers]

You get a lot wrong. The regime change op in Afghanistan started with Zbigniew Brzezinski and the Pentagon and CIA inculcating what was before AL-Queda, the Mujahideen. They were powerful with US support in the effort to strip away Afghanistan form the Soviet sphere. Russia's invasion was a response to this threat from its south. Just like Russia will defend Iran if push comes to shove. Brzezinski went there and there are many photographs. He was like McCain and Graham, just decades before, with a different opponent on his "global chessboard" - Bolshevik Communism.

Britain and France did not de-stablize the Middle East, it was working as well as possible. What de-stabilized the Middle East was the Zoinist Project - and the British may be blamed to some extent for being its sponsor - but thet were also quite naive and did not forsee just how sociopathic and predatory the Zionist Entity would become, even terrorizing and murdering top British officers and statesmen.

This is why the Windsors never went there and have never been friendly with "Israel". Concerning the US motivation in dealings with Iraq, and Syria, and others like Khadaffi, it was against the strong, secular governments, because Pan-Arabism and Pan-Africanism were going to become successful and create superstates that could challenge "Israel" for regional supremacy. Just like Kennedy supported Nasser in Egypt.

Good luck on your learning journey. You should try and speak less enphatically about things you don't know.

No the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan was by design not a response to the USA.

They started communist revolutions in the cold war in order to make countrys fight and kill each other and then they would go prop up the side that would let them rule their country by proxy as a totalitarian dictatorship.

Thats what happened in Korea and the front lines are froze to this day.

North Korea is ruled by Russia and is fighting and dying in the Ukraine war and has a dictatorship and South Korea is a prosperous free country that is a democracy.

 

[ClaytonB]

ISIS wasn't created to go fight the Islamic revolution and expansion of the new persian religious empire. They were a response to the Islamic revolution that Russia created because it was a response to global communism that Russia was using to take over the Middle East.

How can I put this politely? Uh, you're a moron. Every word of this is unintelligible word-salad, your AI has gone off the rails.

America manufactures enemies in order to attack them. This is what every empire does as it begins to age and descends into its death throes. The military-industrial complex is a well-fed lion that requires fresh meat on a daily basis ... even if you have to paint lion cubs to look like deer to feed them to the god-lion. And that's the real purpose of the CIA... they paint lion cubs to look like deer and feed them to the god-lion so it can stay strong and well-fed. But this cannibalism is insane and inherently unsustainable. In the end, the US Government is not at war with anything except reality itself.

Russia doesn't give a single hoot about Islam, if anything, Russia has been pounding Islam in Chechnya for longer than the US has been in the ME. Russia makes alliances with Islamic nations because they are neighbors. That's what smart people do with their neighbors, they make alliances. As for the "Islamic revolution", the only revolution that has been going on in the ME is the US bombing ME countries, toppling governments, and installing puppets.

Russia starts civil wars in countrys and then invades them when they are weakened and conquers them.

This has happened exactly ZERO times since the fall of the Berlin wall. It's not 1985 anymore, neoCON-bot.

The USA toppled Saddam's dictatorship that Russia armed and propped up in order to achieve the objective of ruling the entire region and changing the post cold war status quo so they can enslave other countries like they did as the Soviet Empire where the region of Moscow ruled the other Soviet regions as slaves.

No, the USA invaded Iraq in order to seize control of its oil fields, to set up military bases on the border of Iran, and to pave an aerial highway from Israel to Iran. Every single word that DC says about "Russia" is 100% excuses and distraction to try to deflect attention away from their true agenda, which is fellating the false-zionist State.

 

[nikcers]

How can I put this politely? Uh, you're a moron. Every word of this is unintelligible word-salad, your AI has gone off the rails.

America manufactures enemies in order to attack them. This is what every empire does as it begins to age and descends into its death throes. The military-industrial complex is a well-fed lion that requires fresh meat on a daily basis ... even if you have to paint lion cubs to look like deer to feed them to the god-lion. And that's the real purpose of the CIA... they paint lion cubs to look like deer and feed them to the god-lion so it can stay strong and well-fed. But this cannibalism is insane and inherently unsustainable. In the end, the US Government is not at war with anything except reality itself.

Russia doesn't give a single hoot about Islam, if anything, Russia has been pounding Islam in Chechnya for longer than the US has been in the ME. Russia makes alliances with Islamic nations because they are neighbors. That's what smart people do with their neighbors, they make alliances. As for the "Islamic revolution", the only revolution that has been going on in the ME is the US bombing ME countries, toppling governments, and installing puppets.



This has happened exactly ZERO times since the fall of the Berlin wall. It's not 1985 anymore, neoCON-bot.



No, the USA invaded Iraq in order to seize control of its oil fields, to set up military bases on the border of Iran, and to pave an aerial highway from Israel to Iran. Every single word that DC says about "Russia" is 100% excuses and distraction to try to deflect attention away from their true agenda, which is fellating the false-zionist State.

The USA has the most friends in the world. Hundreds of countries and their people because we imposed a status quo after World War 2 that allowed for people to govern themselves and not be ruled by and enslaved by empires. The United States is the arsenal of democracy.

"We cannot safely confine government programs to our own domestic progress and our own military power. We could be the wealthiest and the most mighty nation and still lose the battle of the world if we do not help our world neighbors protect their freedom and advance their social and economic progress. It is not the goal of the American people that the United States should be the richest nation in the graveyard of history."

-Eisenhower

 

[ClaytonB]

The USA has the most friends in the world. Hundreds of countries and their people because we imposed a status quo after World War 2 that allowed for people to govern themselves and not be ruled by and enslaved by empires. The United States is the arsenal of democracy.

Absolute nonsense. Utterly false. Since 9/11, the US has made more enemies than all other countries combined by doing things like, oh let's see, bombing wedding parties in Afghanistan, killing hundreds of innocents in a single attack. Such incidents are not rare, and the US has an ocean of innocent blood on its hands from tragic incidents like this. Every such attack has created an army of enemies of the US... millions of people, in all, who have good reason to want to see America destroyed. That includes me and my family. We are now legitimate targets of foreign persons who hate us because of the illegal war-crimes committed by the pirates in DC. DC are the terrorists!

"We cannot safely confine government programs to our own domestic progress and our own military power. We could be the wealthiest and the most mighty nation and still lose the battle of the world if we do not help our world neighbors protect their freedom and advance their social and economic progress. It is not the goal of the American people that the United States should be the richest nation in the graveyard of history."
-Eisenhower

Eisenhower became President, which means he was part of the Cabal, there is no other way to be President. So of course he supported the Cabal's globalist agenda.