tod evans
Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2008
- Messages
- 36,071
And iron bars.
Are pikes okay?
And iron bars.
whitehouse petition for clemency
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/justice-shaneen-allen/HbmhDWDk
Are pikes okay?
From:
Frank Jack Fiamingo <[email protected]>
Dear friends and supporters of the NJ2AS,
You have recently made a donation to the NJ2AS or the NJ2AS Billboard campaign for Shaneen Allen. Due to the generosity of all the donors, we were able to raise more than enough money to pay for the billboards. You should know that your contributions have enabled us to erect *FOUR* billboards around the Atlantic County Criminal Courthouse Complex. They will be up and operational on 9/15/2014.
In speaking with Shaneen, we have discovered that she is having quite a lot of difficulty paying her bills. As you know, she was fired from her position as a phlebotomist due to her arrest. This is part of the price she is being forced to pay for making the mistake of traveling into NJ with her legally owned, defensive firearm and PA carry permit. We would like your permission to use some of the funds collected on her behalf, to give her a check to help pay her bills. Please let me know if you prefer that the contribution you made be used in some other fashion.
Thank you again for your generosity,
Frank Jack Fiamingo
President – NJ2AS
I HAD NOT REALIZED THIS BOGUS, BS ARREST HAD COST SHANEEN ALLEN HER JOB.
UPDATE:
As anyone who has read this thread is aware, the New Jersey Second Amendment Society has been raising funds in order to erect billboards in the Atlantic City, New Jersey, area where Shaneen Allen will be tried in court for the "crime" of having a firearm in her car. I have donated to the billboard effort, so my name and email address are on the NJ2AS mailing list.
Early today, I got the following email, which contained some information I did not previously know:
Wow.
I HAD NOT REALIZED THIS BOGUS, BS ARREST HAD COST SHANEEN ALLEN HER JOB.
Of course I don't mind the NJ2AS using some of the cash to help Shaneen. She has two kids, and they need a roof over their heads and they need to eat. In fact, I'm going to be checking about some way to make a direct cash donation to the family to help with the bills.
So to recap, this woman has been arrested for a "crime" that she did not even know she was committing. She was tossed in jail, managed somehow to get bail (probably at enormous expense) and was then fired from her job as a medical technician because she was charged - not convicted, mind, just charged - with breaking a law she did not even know existed. And all this simply because she wanted to protect herself and her small children, and had jumped through every single possible legal hoop to make it happen.
That this is happening to such a dutiful young woman is beyond insane. Beyond despicable.
For all the State apologists out there, for all those who wonder why so many of us look upon the police and "justice" system with contempt, I give you this case. Look upon the prosecution of Shaneen Allen, and wonder no more.
How the hell did this happen? I have a few ideas.
I want to take a moment to give a shout-out to some notable people in this case:
So... Thank you so much, Officer Asshole, for arresting this woman. As a law enforcement officer, you have discretion regarding who is arrested and who is simply given a warning. You, sir... you KNEW what the consequences of this arrest would be. It was clear this young woman was a professional, well educated person who was harming no one. You KNEW when you arrested her rather than give her a warning... you KNEW this was going to wreck her life. You could have stopped this from happening before it ever began. So thank you so much, you portentous, arrogant, boot-licking little government toady. The nightmare this woman's life has become is directly on you.
Persecutor - err... Prosecutor James P. McClain, I can't apply the words "thank you" to you even if they are dripping with sarcasm. How can you demand prison time from this woman, sir? From which corner of your dark, twisted, pathologically sadistic mind did you draw the idea that this was in ANY way serving justice? How can you possibly justify spending thousands of taxpayer dollars to tear this woman away from the small children she so desperately wanted to protect? How can you lock this woman in a cage when she had no intent of doing anything wrong? You had a choice, McClain. Much more of a choice than you ever gave Ms. Allen. Even if you didn't want to drop all charges (which is what you should do) you could have given Shaneen Allen a shot at PTI. Pre Trial Intervention would have meant no jail time and a chance to expunge her record with good behavior. But you actively fought to deny her that opportunity. How revealing that you, as prosecutor, did NOT block it for NFL star Ray Rice. Remember Ray Rice, McClain? The man who beat his wife to the brink of unconsciousness and dragged her off an elevator while they were in Atlantic City? McClain, do you believe that beating a woman unconscious is LESS of a crime than carrying a legally purchased pistol with a carry permit valid in a neighboring state? You, Mr. McClain, are the lowest form of bully and sadist. If you don't like my accusation, then prove me wrong by dropping all charges against Shaneen Allen.
And thank you too, Governor Christie. Thanks for showing your true colors: yellow. One hundred percent coward. Not only were you the one who appointed the sadist McClain, you are the pathetic excuse of a man who sat by when a word from you could have righted a terrible injustice. You could have stopped this with a phone call, and with that call you could have saved a young woman's life as well as countless thousands of taxpayer dollars. But no. You had to sit on the sidelines with a finger in the wind and a thumb up your butt. You decided to hide behind "the system" even though this was such an egregious violation of common sense and human decency that even staunch anti-gun voters felt it was going too far. So thanks again, Mr. Christie, for demonstrating what a disgusting, indecisive lump you really are. You could have turned this issue into a groundswell of support for a White House run. But no. You refused to do the right thing because you weren't sure if it would be popular. So thanks for making it clear, here and now, that your heart holds no decency or human mercy. It's good to know what a feckless bastard you really are.
Go to hell, all three of you.
Thank you for your concern and kindness, Ken. I will get you that information tomorrow.
I met Shaneen for the first time this evening and she is a delightful person. She is a loving mother and her children ADORE her. She is EXTREMELY fearful of what will happen to her family if she is sent to prison, so we will all have to do everything we can to keep her home with her kids.
I know that your help will be appreciated. I believe that her legal defense fund is doing well enough that we can afford to concentrate more on keeping her head above water until this entire horror show is resolved. I am still hopeful that if we pull out all the stops, we can convince Governor Christie to step in and prevent this injustice. I believe that Shaneen has setup a link to be able to accept contributions to her ongoing support until she is back on her feet. I will get that link, email it to you, and I will also display it on our website for others to use.
All the best,
Frank Jack Fiamingo
President – NJ2AS
Confirmation Number: 4LT466694V9161316 Placed on Sep 15, 2014
Purpose Shaneen Allen Donation amount $100.00 USD
Losing my job. Not being employable after the prosecutor, intent on "making an example" of me, gets me indicted on felony charges and then offers me a plea deal which would land me in the state penitentiary for three and a half YEARS. Turning down the "deal" and being told the prosecutor would now press for the maximum of over TEN years upon conviction... all this, when I never even intended to break the law. All this after I had jumped through innumerable hoops in order to abide by the law, in fact.
Prosecutor seeks time to rethink position on Shaneen Allen gun case
By LYNDA COHEN Staff Writer | Posted: Monday, September 15, 2014 5:30 pm
Atlantic County Prosecutor Jim McClain told a judge his office is reviewing its position in the case of a Philadelphia mother facing prison time for bringing her legally owned gun into New Jersey.
Shaneen Allen, 27, was arrested last year after she was pulled over Oct. 1 on the Atlantic City Expressway in Hamilton Township, and told the state trooper she had her gun and a concealed carry permit with her. She says she did not know it was illegal to bring the gun into New Jersey.
McClain has faced criticism for denying Allen admission into a diversion program that would allow her to complete a program and avoid prosecution. It is a stance the prosecutor has taken in most of these cases, under the state’s strict Graves Act.
“I am presently in the process of reviewing our office’s position on the appropriate resolution of this matter,” McClain wrote in a letter sent last week to Superior Court Judge Michael Donio.
He asked that the case be adjourned for three weeks to allow the review. Donio granted the request.
A trial set for Oct. 6 has now been moved to Oct. 20. A conference to discuss motions and jury selection set for this week has been moved to Sept. 25.
As mentioned earlier, the New Jersey Second Amendment Society together with the Fully Informed Jury Association is asking for volunteers to pass out pamphlets regarding jury rights and responsibilities:
http://www.nj2as.com/event-1734159
*
If anyone is close to the Atlantic City area and is interested in participating in this effort, let me know. I will contribute some money for gas.
*
Good news from Atlantic County, New Jersey: It looks like Shaneen Allen, the Philadelphia gun owner who faced a mandatory minimum sentence of three and a half years for driving across the Delaware River with a pistol in her purse, will escape prison after all. The Press of Atlantic City reports that Atlantic County Prosecutor Jim McClain, who initially refused to approve Allen for a pretrial diversion program, has changed his mind.
McClain cited a memo issued today by acting Attorney General John Hoffman, who told local prosecutors that "imprisonment is neither necessary nor appropriate to serve the interests of justice and protect public safety" in cases like Allen's. "In applying the factors set out in the clarification," McClain said, "I determined that the defendant in this case should be offered the opportunity to be admitted into the Atlantic County PTI [Pretrial Intervention] Program."
Hoffman's memo looks like a face-saving excuse for McClain, who more than a week ago signaled that he was reconsidering his hard-line approach to Allen's case, which had attracted nationwide attention. But if sparing McClain additional embarrassment is what it takes for him to abandon a clearly unjust prosecution, it's a small price to pay. Furthermore, Hoffman's memo should help similarly situated defendants. The Press says "the clarification also means McClain will now review other similar cases that have been denied PTI in the past."
The Pretrial Intervention Program (PTI) provides defendants, generally first-time offenders, with opportunities for alternatives to the traditional criminal justice process of ordinary prosecution. PTI seeks to render early rehabilitative services, when such services can reasonably be expected to deter future criminal behavior. The PTI program is based on a rehabilitative model that recognizes that there may be an apparent causal connection between the offense charged and the rehabilitative needs of a defendant. Further, the rehabilitative model emphasizes that social, cultural, and economic conditions often result in a defendant's decision to commit crime.
Simply stated, PTI strives to solve personal problems which tend to result from the conditions that appear to cause crime, and ultimately, to deter future criminal or disorderly behavior by a defendant.
What Are The Benefits of the Pretrial Intervention Program (PTI)?
- If PTI is successfully completed, there is no record of conviction and the defendant avoids the stigma of a criminal record.
- Early intervention allows rehabilitative services to be provided soon after the alleged offense, in an attempt to correct the behavior that led to the offense.
- Many of the costs associated with the formal court process are eliminated through acceptance into PTI.
- PTI provides early resolution of a case which serves the interests of the victim, the public and the defendant.
- PTI reduces the burden on the court and allows resources to be devoted to more serious criminals.
What are the Conditions for Participation In Pretrial Intervention?
Supervision under the PTI program may average from one to three years. Certain standard conditions are imposed on those accepted into PTI, such as, random urine monitoring, and assessments for fees, penalties and fines. Additional conditions may also be imposed to require the performance of community service, payment of restitution, and submission to psychological and/or drug and alcohol evaluations with compliance to recommended treatment programs.
If a defendant successfully completes all the conditions of PTI, then the original charges are dismissed and there is no record of conviction.
If a defendant does not successfully complete the conditions of PTI, then the defendant is terminated from the PTI program and the case is returned to the trial list.
Prosecutor Drops Prison Threat Against Gun Owner Who Mistakenly Thought Her Pennsylvania Carry Permit Was Good in New Jersey
Good news from Atlantic County, New Jersey: It looks like Shaneen Allen, the Philadelphia gun owner who faced a mandatory minimum sentence of three and a half years for driving across the Delaware River with a pistol in her purse, will escape prison after all. The Press of Atlantic City reports that Atlantic County Prosecutor Jim McClain, who initially refused to approve Allen for a pretrial diversion program, has changed his mind.
McClain cited a memo issued today by acting Attorney General John Hoffman, who told local prosecutors that "imprisonment is neither necessary nor appropriate to serve the interests of justice and protect public safety" in cases like Allen's. "In applying the factors set out in the clarification," McClain said, "I determined that the defendant in this case should be offered the opportunity to be admitted into the Atlantic County PTI [Pretrial Intervention] Program."
Hoffman's memo looks like a face-saving excuse for McClain, who more than a week ago signaled that he was reconsidering his hard-line approach to Allen's case, which had attracted nationwide attention. But if sparing McClain additional embarrassment is what it takes for him to abandon a clearly unjust prosecution, it's a small price to pay. Furthermore, Hoffman's memo should help similarly situated defendants. The Press says "the clarification also means McClain will now review other similar cases that have been denied PTI in the past."
Allen was arrested last October after she was pulled over on the Atlantic City Expressway for a minor traffic violation and volunteered to the state trooper that she had a gun in her purse. She erroneously believed that her Pennsylvania carry permit was good in New Jersey, and for that mistake McClain was prepared to put her behind bars for years, separating her from her two young sons. McClain's predecessor and prosecutors in other counties took a more lenient approach, commonly approving PTI for defendants like her. But until now McClain had argued that New Jersey law did not allow such exceptions.