[Update: Withdrew] Trump's DEA nominee [Chronister] is a gun-grabber, and anti-freedom

I don't look for people I agree with 100% anymore. I don't care about RFK's opinions on abortion or this guy's view on gun rights. Its irrelevant. Cut the DEA in half anyways.
 

"WE NEED A DEA DIRECTOR WHO BELIEVES IN FREEDOM"

Isn't that kind of like saying "we need an atheist who believes in god" ... ?

gzfH131.gif
 
"WE NEED A DEA DIRECTOR WHO BELIEVES IN FREEDOM"

Isn't that kind of like saying "we need an atheist who believes in god" ... ?
No because Trump can't abolish the DEA without Congress. But if he puts in a pro-freedom Director, they can cripple or hamper the organization top down, inside out. Unfortunately that's the best we can hope for.
 
I don't look for people I agree with 100% anymore. I don't care about RFK's opinions on abortion or this guy's view on gun rights. Its irrelevant. Cut the DEA in half anyways.


I feel you, but with regards to a tyrant like this, I don't see someone like him taking steps to dismantle the DEA.
 
Now do the Izraeli Firster Secretary of Defense, what's his face, the rapist.
 
At DEA he has nothing to do with anything like Covid or guns.

This is why nobody takes you seriously.
We all remember like a whole year of the Covid conversation being about two different drugs.
Drugs that the DEA absolutely could claim jurisdiction over.
 
This is why nobody takes you seriously.
We all remember like a whole year of the Covid conversation being about two different drugs.
Drugs that the DEA absolutely could claim jurisdiction over.

Likewise, it isn't hard to find DEA press releases about arrests they performed where the crimes included illegally possessing guns.
 
I feel you, but with regards to a tyrant like this, I don't see someone like him taking steps to dismantle the DEA.

Looks like this turd won't be a problem now as he has withdrawn. Hopefully a much better person is next.


I'm sure you meant literally, right? Like we can livestream it and watch the life drain from its eyes while it bleeds out?

Yes, just to get started.
 
No because Trump can't abolish the DEA without Congress. But if he puts in a pro-freedom Director, they can cripple or hamper the organization top down, inside out. Unfortunately that's the best we can hope for.

Then you are hoping for too much.

Trump doesn't want to abolish the DEA, even if Congress would let him (which, of course, they wouldn't).

And even if he wanted to hamper or hamstring the DEA with a "pro-freedom" administrator (which he doesn't), the Senate would never confirm such a nominee.
 
This is why nobody takes you seriously.
We all remember like a whole year of the Covid conversation being about two different drugs.
Drugs that the DEA absolutely could claim jurisdiction over.

They didn't then because they couldn't, they doubly couldn't in Trump's new administration.

This is why nobody takes you seriously.
 
Back
Top