[Unverified] National Enquirer Runs Story of Multiple Ted Cruz Affairs

[Jan2017]

I see it's back.

Some moderator had the sense to see that the only long running thread on the cruz sex scandal has SOME bearing on the presidential race!

PS: I have no problem renaming this cruz sex scandal. It's incidental that it was the first thread to go up which mentioned the first article in the news about it.

Well it was merged with one or two other threads . . .
I only read and then posted to the "while you were sleeping, twitter went viral" thread - for at least the first day until merged.

Now . . . where were we at . . .
about to post how Wisconsin voters should realize that lawyers are condemning the Carly-Cruz pivot as an "answer" to the UK newspaper reporter
- it would not be sufficient for a deposition.

Maybe, instead just serve Lyin' Ted and family with a subpoena for his wife's psychiatric records for when she first learned of Teddy's trists.

The double bonus is that Amanda's threat to the Washington Post



will just give greater attention to the better indication of the lack of character for a presidential candidate than even potential adultery . . .

using his kids as props.




Cruz's kids are the only young children of a candidate to have been parodied on national television . . . (Chelsea ?)
who is that actress that played your daughter on Saturday Night Live again Teddy (?) - she really nailed her.

 

[cajuncocoa]

A double bonus about Mandy's ultra-clever post - besides any double-entendre about a Sugar Daddy - is that the topic brings even more attention to Cruz' more egregious than adultery behavior - using his kids as props.





.

Bingo. That's exactly what her tweet was about.

Notice the date: December 22, 2015...the same day the WASHINGTON POST ran the cartoon you posted above.

Washington Post removes cartoon depicting Ted Cruz's daughters as monkeys

By ELIZA COLLINS
12/22/15 06:32 PM EST
Updated 12/22/15 07:57 PM EST

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/12/cruz-daughters-washington-post-217085


"Daddy" Cruz referred to him as the pissed off father to his daughters, coming to "get" the cartoonist from the Washington Post. (I'm not too sure Cruz has it in him to "get" anyone, but that's what she was speaking about.)

 

[ApathyCuredRP]

This forum has turned into such a turd. Stinking pile of poop.

 

[Petar]

This forum has turned into such a turd. Stinking pile of poop.

Please describe this "turd" in greater detail.

Thank you.

 

[RonPaulGeorge&Ringo]

Cruz's kids are the only young children of a candidate to have been parodied on national television . . .

http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/andrew-giuliani-cold-open/2860970

 

[Jan2017]

Bingo. That's exactly what her tweet was about.

Amanda cryin to the blogoshere that her Sugar Daddy was coming after them is a nice double-entendre as well -
Cruz can't go after anyone about anything anymore -
including Obamacare or newspapers with an accurate depiction in parody of Cruz on youtube,
or Saturday Night Live producers after daughter(s) brought up at least two different weekends.

Ya' gotta lurve (Amanda-talk) Ted Cruz' "Boehner" moment in tears with his story . . . maybe soon to top 1,000,000 youtube views


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hO_MkcZh-VY
.

 

[RDM]

...

 

[RDM]

Ok guys any body and facial language experts in the house to analyze this interview.

Let's put it this way. She's had a affair behind her husband's back, whether it be Cruz or someone else. When asked if she had a affair with Cruz, she answered No with her eyes closed which is a sign for lying. She also looked down when she talked about being faithful to her husband which is a sign of shame. She also blinked alot when she described these allegations as conspiracy theories which is a sign of nervousness and at one point, rolled her eyeballs up which is a sign of trying to remember something to say that may have been rehearsed instead of speaking from the heart.

 

[Jan2017]

http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/andrew-giuliani-cold-open/2860970

lol - OK I figured there could be some others . . . SNL mocking Giuliani bringing his kid to the podium at the Mayoral Inauguration in 1994.

Cruz sure made alot of commercial camera footage with his kids as pawns, didn't he ?


.

 

[devil21]

Gotta love it. Libertarians. The defenders of privacy circle jerking each other over the invasion of privacy of someone they don't like. Why don't you guys donate some money to the NSA. Maybe they can connect the dots you need for you.

Yeah! Because surely by respecting the privacy of the Talmudist "legal" usurpers (lawyers that craft prisons of the mind) like Cruz you will surely win your freedom back from the Talmudist "legal" usurpers like Cruz.

Read a history book or something. It's Cruz and his ilk that are RESPONSIBLE for there even being a Libertarian faction.

Here, lemme help you get started:
http://www.teamlaw.org/HistoryOutline.htm

(eta: textbook "post sliding" tactic below this post....that's a link TPTB really don't want people to read.....)

 

[CPUd]

Speaking of candidates' children:

 

[cajuncocoa]

Speaking of candidates' children:

Transcript of money question: “Your social media editor tweeted out a crazy video, suggesting that Amanda Carpenter, who’s married with two children, and this married senator who also has two children — that something untoward was going on. There is no actual evidence that it happened. I mean at some point, aren't you just ashamed? This is the Trump campaign sending it out.” - Jake Tapper

Her response to "aren't you just ashamed?" was a brilliant deflection.

 

[goldenequity]

Her response to "aren't you just ashamed?" was a brilliant deflection.

Not all was simply deflection... there's some substance (that remains) to discuss/argue
and shouldn't be simply reduced to 'you ought to be ashamed' tactics.

A little more 'insight' into her response via Bill Still.

 

[goldenequity]

Ha Ha Ha.

Sibley threatens to:
(IGNORE Court restraining order) and RELEASE the Verizon Phone Records
revealing some 815 DC/Capitol Hill 'customers'
as they have IMPACT on the 2016 election and the electorate's 'right to know'.
He DEMANDS an 'emergency' court review.... and compensation.
http://wtop.com/presidential-electi...w-release-of-d-c-madam-phone-records-or-else/
tick-tock.

DC Madam (Deborah Jeane Palfrey) and her Attorney Montgomery Blair Sibley (2007)

Is it me... or does she look like Morticia?

"Hello... Lyin' Ted? We've got the Nat. Enq. on hold... they want a meeting."

 

[ChristianAnarchist]

It's sad that we've wasted 17 pages of posts on this subject. I really don't give a damn about how many times Teddy boy has dipped his wick in other holes. This is what propagation is all about and it's an urge that I for one have never fully tamed (and really, who wants to)?

What is the REAL issue is that Teddy (and Trump and Clinton and Sanders) are a bunch of tyrants!!! That is the REAL SCANDAL!! I don't get why people want to get on all these side issues and become totally distracted by the important issues...

 

[69360]

So 6 days after the enquirer runs this, no legitimate media will touch it and Drudge won't touch it. I think the discussion is over, it was make believe tabloid news.

 

[Valli6]

So 6 days after the enquirer runs this, no legitimate media will touch it and Drudge won't touch it. I think the discussion is over, it was make believe tabloid news.

Maybe - but if I remember correctly that's how it was with the John's Edwards story. First it was just considered a rumor. It disapeared for a few weeks, then came back and was accepted as the truth. Right now, they're all wrapped up in the non-story about Trump's campaign manager grabbing princess Michelle Fields' arm. They'll want to milk that story for a while, before looking into a the possibiity of a Ted Cruz scandal.

 

[squirl22]

Maybe - but if I remember correctly that's how it was with the John's Edwards story. First it was just considered a rumor. It disapeared for a few weeks, then came back and was accepted as the truth.

Yes, that's how it works...drip drip drip....one of the women has to come out and confirm....that would help....Jake Tapper is such an objective journalist...isn't he?

 

[69360]

Maybe - but if I remember correctly that's how it was with the John's Edwards story. First it was just considered a rumor. It disapeared for a few weeks, then came back and was accepted as the truth. Right now, they're all wrapped up in the non-story about Trump's campaign manager grabbing princess Michelle Fields' arm. They'll want to milk that story for a while, before looking into a the possibiity of a Ted Cruz scandal.

Trump's campaign manager is guilty. They have him on video and have photos of bruises. While I agree she is being a bit of a princess about it and wasn't actually injured, it meets the legal definition of assault.

 

[goldenequity]

I happen to like shattered icons and don't mind helping to shatter them.
It's why I 'contribute' to a thread like this. Damn them all.

I don't particularly like gossip nor rumors and don't engage in it much. Never have.

I know most ALL of us have flaws and understand what mercy means.
Mercy triumphs over judgement.

Ron Paul is one of the few icons I WILL tolerate.
He deserves it. He really does.

The REST who simply WANT to be icons?
It just depends on how arrogant they are.
If they're truly obnoxious and deceitful....
I just feel compelled to shatter/expose them.
Can't help it.

I like to laugh. I find Trump amusing.
There is NOTHING amusing about Cruz. Completely repulsed by him. **shudder**