[Unverified] National Enquirer Runs Story of Multiple Ted Cruz Affairs

I have no sympathy for the woman at all. Her "blacklist" of everyone who supported Trump was an attempt to damage their careers. Whether it would have had any impact, I don't know. But the intent was there. Her list included many prominent influential people. Just *one* of those names was enough to give her grief for life and she compiled a list of dozens of those people and was calling them out on the national media. Essentially, it was a smear campaign. (albeit an ill thought out smear campaign) She obviously doesn't understand the reality of big time national politics.

She's an airhead who somehow developed a grossly inflated sense of her importance and influence.

Stupidity has a price.

One ruined career later Amanda Carpenter knows what it is.
 
Yes. I got that the first 3 times. What's your point?

This is the post you questioned . . . still need help ?

MfklZ.jpg


Pic from 2011 ? I found this tag to that photo . . .

Fun-loving Amanda Carpenter prepares to burn one down as she walks down Wisconsin Avenue to an Oscar party in Georgetown 2011-02-28

QUOTE=cajuncocoa;6182227]Congratulations! It looks like you found the smoking gun! Anytime a woman is described as "fun-loving" you should automatically assume it means she's a whore. Good for you![/QUOTE]

Congratulations! It looks like you found the smoking gun! Anytime a woman is described as "fun-loving" you should automatically assume it means she's a whore. Good for you!
 
Last edited:
As stated . . . she is not walking from or to a hotel . . . she is going to an Oscar Party in February of 2011

You seem bothered that the photo caption characterizes the subject in the photo as "fun-loving Amanda" back in 2011 . . .
That day when "Liberty Forest" started picking on people for supposedly loving fun.
 
As stated . . . she is not walking from or to a hotel . . . she is going to an Oscar Party in February of 2011

You seem bothered that the photo caption characterizes the subject in the photo as "fun-loving Amanda" back in 2011 . . .
So?
 
That day when "Liberty Forest" started picking on people for supposedly loving fun.

Well, I didn't find the photo caption from anyone at "Liberty Forest" . . .
but maybe something in her previous employment in 2011 earned her that caption in the press.
 
Yes. Because I still don't understand what YOUR POINT is.

The photo was in 2011 . . .
sorry I just cut-and-paste'd the full photo caption to your point of irritation - I should've edited out the part you find so offensive.
 
Last edited:
I have no sympathy for the woman at all. Her "blacklist" of everyone who supported Trump was an attempt to damage their careers. Whether it would have had any impact, I don't know. But the intent was there. Her list included many prominent influential people. Just *one* of those names was enough to give her grief for life and she compiled a list of dozens of those people and was calling them out on the national media. Essentially, it was a smear campaign. (albeit an ill thought out smear campaign) She obviously doesn't understand the reality of big time national politics.

She's an airhead who somehow developed a grossly inflated sense of her importance and influence.

Stupidity has a price.

One ruined career later Amanda Carpenter knows what it is.
That's fine. Just make sure you know what you're talking about. But none of you do. You're grasping at straws and not only making yourselves look like assholes, you're making RPF look bad at the same time because right now all you have is circumstantial evidence. When you really have something, knock yourselves out. But what you're doing right now is sickening. Calling a woman out because the caption under her picture says "fun-loving"? What is this? 1955?
 
So, reading the photo caption she probaby wasn't coming from a Ted Cruz hotel room fun-loving . . .
but maybe some of the waitresses, doormen and paparazzi have photos of the recent trists.
And maybe they don't. Stop the witch hunt.
 
Am I going to have to drag this out of you? Get to the point.

The photo was taken in 2011 . . . you can imagine there is some other point to posting the photo caption -
so sorry I jus' cut and pasted the whole caption, I really didn't think any adjectives were really that worthy of censorship.
 
But what you're doing right now is sickening. Calling a woman out because the caption under her picture says "fun-loving"? What is this? 1955?

I said nothing about the photo.

I said that she chose to run a smear campaign against a *lot* of very powerful, influential political figures and learned a lesson about why it's not a good idea to do that.

Mess with the bull, you get the horns. And Amanda Carpenter was aggravating a large herd of bulls.

I doubt that she's received her last horn.
 
I said nothing about the photo.

I said that she chose to run a smear campaign against a *lot* of very powerful, influential political figures and learned a lesson about why it's not a good idea to do that.

Mess with the bull, you get the horns. And Amanda Carpenter was aggravating a large herd of bulls.

I doubt that she's received her last horn.
Powerful influential political figures? That sounds like establishment people....I didn't think Trump was hanging out with any of those. But I digress. Let the ugly people be ugly. RPF has no horse in that race....and it makes this place look bad. Especially if it turns out to be false.
 
The photo was taken in 2011 . . . you can imagine there is some other point to posting the photo caption -
so sorry I jus' cut and pasted the whole caption, I really didn't think any adjectives were really that worthy of censorship.

Well . . . no witch hunt . . . the photo was NOT from the hotel as implied. I don't think the hotel of the trist has been determined.
I hate to break this to you, but this still isn't making your point clear. What's the big deal about 2011 and the Oscar Party? Fill me in. Don't make me imagine anything....and no censorship, spit it out.
 
Powerful influential political figures? That sounds like establishment people....

Some were establishment, some weren't. But anybody who is working to support Ted Cruz has no problem with the establishment.

She had another motive.

But she's paying for it,..so it's all good.
 
Some were establishment, some weren't. But anybody who is working to support Ted Cruz has no problem with the establishment.

.
I'm confused. I thought you meant she was messing with "powerful influential political figures" who were Trump supporters, not Cruz supporters.
 
Back
Top