[Unverified] National Enquirer Runs Story of Multiple Ted Cruz Affairs

[ProBlue33]

 

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

Actually, because the National Enquirer was already starting to print the story, and had completed it after thoroughly looking at it - Breitbart had it two months ago - , we can assume that Liz Mair's online ad was placed to deflect attention away from Ted Cruz and give a plausible reason to blame Trump.

Last week, the tiny but noisy super PAC Make America Awesome ran a Facebook ad, part of a flight of three anti-Trump ads, aimed at social conservatives in Utah:

That's right. It was only an online facebook ad, a rush job. It wasn't "high resolution", no one ordered special copies of anything contrary to rumor, It had almost no affect on voting, and was only designed to create noise.

No special order or permission, rush job on facebook:

Alongside the increasingly playground-like tussle between Trump and Cruz, the re-emergence of the nude photo has actually angered Verglas.

"I never gave any approval for this image to be used anywhere else but GQ in the U.K. It puts me in a very weird situation as I have to protect my intellectual property and the privacy of Melania Trump," the photographer says, adding that he's already talking to his attorney. "I don't want those pictures to be used in certain ways which are inappropriate."
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/gq-editor-recalls-donald-trump-878336

No one prints a story from start to stop in a day. The Cruz camp knew it was coming out that week, and wanted a plausible excuse to deflect it, and started this ridiculous shit over Trump's wife being a super model, and posing semi-nude (aka swimsuit revealing), in the non-adult magazine GQ, to deflect the about to be released scandal.

 

[Jan2017]

The old twitters people are finding from her account are looking worse and worse.

.

 

[Peace&Freedom]

We also know a number of other media organs were holding on the story. For accuracy, it was the Cruz PAC that sent the $500K to Carly's campaign, not Cruz directly---but that opens up the issue of whether Cruz was in communication with the PAC to do that. What a mess. It does now appear that the Melania/Heidi picture flap was a countermeasure thrown up by Cruz to misdirect from or cloud the mistress story that he knew was coming.

 

[Jamesiv1]

#bangof8

lol

 

[Jamesiv1]

It makes no sense that a PAC, who gives the candidate millions, is supposedly filled with candidate supporters, whose reason for being is to put their man in the White House, would do something potentially damaging without bouncing it off the official campaign.

"We're not affiliated with that PAC and had no knowledge of what they were doing!"

baloney.

 

[luctor-et-emergo]

It makes no sense that a PAC, who gives the candidate millions, is supposedly filled with candidate supporters, whose reason for being is to put their man in the White House, would do something potentially damaging without bouncing off the official campaign.

"We're not affiliated with that PAC and had no knowledge of what they were doing!"

baloney.

It also makes no sense for a Cruz PAC to support a Carly PAC. Knowledge or not.

 

[squirl22]

To me, there is definitely something going on between cruz and the amanda carpenter person...too many signs...(I wonder why she would need a lawyer? ) Just wondering....the only way this will break out into msm full time is if some of the women come forth and say it is true. The mistake Trump made was sending out that picture of Heidi...childish and unnecessary...wish he wouldn't have done that...to me it indicates he did not know about this story...he wouldn't have done it if he knew the hammer was dropping anyway. I also feel Heidi Cruz has mental health issues...she may have a mental breakdown over this...very strange family dynamics...feel bad for the kids...

 

[sparebulb]

Idle speculation:

If Heidi Goldman would walk out in traffic in despair over losing her job in the White House.

To what ends would she go to become a resident in the White House?

With that in mind, Ted Goldman can fully count on Heidi to stand by his side when the time comes to put on the show.

 

[ProBlue33]

WOW

 

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

(above is 8:22am Eastern time)

Oddly enough, she didn't deny it though:

Umm.

Ouch!

If you say so...

Umm, he's married Amanda.

A little too frisky.

 

[ProBlue33]

This is the gift that keeps on giving, laughs that is

 

[misterx]

Not a subject matter I'd be interested enough in to retweet

To be fair, did she RT it because she liked it or because she thought it was abhorrent? It's not clear.

 

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

To be fair, did she RT it because she liked it or because she thought it was abhorrent? It's not clear.

Nor did I decide in my comment.

 

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

 

[eleganz]

Rand is a lot more dangerous than Ted Cruz. I'm quite certain they'd rather have Trump than Rand.

Try again, Eleganz? Try being nicer next time though.

Your "quite certainty" means absolutely nothing, what exactly is quite certain? What real world evidence is that based off of? You have none.

So the whole point is to pay attention, to the facts. Jeb Bush endorsed Cruz which is a blatant example of "anything could happen".

If you want to live in your own world that anyone with the last name Paul is banned from any form of presidential electoral success because they're too "good" then your tinfoil hat fits perfectly.

Major establishment support like a flat out endorsement from Jeb Bush to Cruz is a very obvious example of how badly they don't want Trump.

Step back into the real world.

 

[misterx]

Your "quite certainty" means absolutely nothing, what exactly is quite certain? What real world evidence is that based off of? You have none.

So the whole point is to pay attention, to the facts. Jeb Bush endorsed Cruz which is a blatant example of "anything could happen".

If you want to live in your own world that anyone with the last name Paul is banned from any form of presidential electoral success because they're too "good" then your tinfoil hat fits perfectly.

Major establishment support like a flat out endorsement from Jeb Bush to Cruz is a very obvious example of how badly they don't want Trump.

Step back into the real world.

I can tell you're not ready for a serious conversation. Come back when you've learned a little about how politics works. Until then, you're dismissed.

 

[Cleaner44]

Experts: Ted Cruz Appears Deceptive in His Response to Sex Scandal
http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/beh...appears-deceptive-in-response-to-sex-scandal/

Behaviorally, when the facts are the ally of an individual, he or she almost always tends to focus on the facts of the matter at hand. In this case, if the key fact was that he had not had these affairs, Cruz would almost certainly have been much more strongly focused on the denial. That is, he very likely would have made a point of explicitly stating something along the lines of, “I did not have these affairs.”

Yet at no point in either statement did Cruz say that. He implied it by saying the allegations are false, and that they’re lies, but behaviorally, such statements are not equivalent to saying he never had the affairs. Even if we were to overlook that fact and consider his statements to be a denial, there is an overwhelmingly higher proportion of attack behavior compared to the effort expended at denial. This type of lopsided attack-to-denial ratio is very consistent with what we have historically seen with deceptive people when allegations are levied against them.

Not looking good for Lyin Ted.

 

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

...

 

[kahless]