Unsafe and Ineffective

Some new Science[sup]TM[/sup] just dropped:

twSeywu.jpg

Damn.

The implication: Idiots will assume these rates are that percentage higher than states that allow abortion. The fact: These compare rates to pre-jab rates. The unspoken: How much are these rates up in abortion states, where presumably more women got jabbed?

The Science® of propaganda. Math isn't sexist, but CNN statisticians certainly are. They love presuming women are idiots.
 
Last edited:
Some new Science[SUP]TM[/SUP] just dropped:

twSeywu.jpg

The graphic doesn't give enough info. What is the Maternal death rates 2020 compared to?
What is the date range of Overall death rates and what periods is it comparing for the increase?
What is the 2019 fetal or infant death rate compared to?

This is just some text with no meaning, meant to make a lie narrative look 'serious'.
 
The graphic doesn't give enough info. What is the Maternal death rates 2020 compared to?
What is the date range of Overall death rates and what periods is it comparing for the increase?
What is the 2019 fetal or infant death rate compared to?

And while all this was going on, what was happening in those states without abortion restrictions? The same thing? Worse?
 
Some Pharmacists had said after their third or fourth doses they are likely arent thinking of getting boosted.
Reason?

For the third time, fourth time for some they got sick, infected.
 
About an hour before the man was hit by the F train in Queens, another man was found dead on an L train in Brooklyn.

The man’s body, still sitting upright on a bench inside the train, was discovered as the subway car pulled into Rockaway Parkway station, the last stop at the end of the line in Canarsie.

Police said there were no signs of trauma and they don’t suspect any criminality.

https://nypost.com/2022/12/26/nyc-m...after-dropping-phone-on-queens-subway-tracks/
 

But the headline is not real, a spokesperson with the Times confirmed to The Associated Press.

“The New York Times did not write or publish that headline,” the spokesperson wrote in an email.

Google searches for the headline and subhead also yield no results. While the fabricated headline looks similar to the Times’ general style, it includes the word “Opinion” in black, while the paper’s website uses red.

It is not clear where the bogus image first originated. While it picked up traction on social media in recent days, a reverse Google Image search showed a version posted on a web forum from four months ago.

https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-419770959650
 
Back
Top