angelatc
Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2007
- Messages
- 50,703
They should have hammered out long term viability plans with the union heads years ago.
They have no interest in long term viability. It's grab-what-you-can-now in the new economy.
They should have hammered out long term viability plans with the union heads years ago.
And why do you assume that only "products that make people's lives better" would be possible in a truly free market? That's a rather bizarre claim, and doesn't follow.
Fact stands that as long as there's a demand for crap food like Twinkies, someone will produce it. I have no idea where you got the idea that business exists to make people's lives better. That's a selling point for the consumer, not the ends of even good-hearted businessmen.
Twinkies make my life better. I pick Twinkies.
as part of liquidation.
Lol, that article says it all! A restructure plan devised by a Democrat and a couple of ex-Goldman Sachs guys. It's Solyndra and Greece combined. We all know where that ends up.
As much fun as it is to talk about Unions, IMHO, the company was doomed when it put it's fate into the hands of vulture capitalists who could make money by letting the company fail and selling off the assets. Might as well borrow money from Tony Soprano.
Why do companies in those states not just move their manufacturing plants to right to work states?
There are plenty of people here in Florida who would work on making twinkies.
As much fun as it is to talk about Unions, IMHO, the company was doomed when it put it's fate into the hands of vulture capitalists who could make money by letting the company fail and selling off the assets. Might as well borrow money from Tony Soprano.
hmmm....Union violence today is more of a myth than fact. Union violence today if it does occur,is limited to petty vandalism like a flat tire. When was the last time anyone was killed from Union violence?...history of Union violence was often times perpetrated by Company goons busting heads, and shootings of picket line workers at the behest of company owners so they could keep paying slave wages, and not have to improve working conditions.
As much fun as it is to talk about Unions, IMHO, the company was doomed when it put it's fate into the hands of vulture capitalists who could make money by letting the company fail and selling off the assets. Might as well borrow money from Tony Soprano.
Anything other than maximum profit is malinvestment of capital.
But didn't the vulture capitalists inject 170 million into the company? Obviously, they were trying to put lisptick on a pig but...
i'm pretty sure you wouldn't work very long in some of the Bakery's i've been in for slave wages...i consider 10 bucks an hour slave wages in this example.
Who says what is "maximum profit"? There is long term risk/reward to consider. A venture capitalist who invested in Apple in 1997 and sold as soon as the stock rose 20% made a foolish decision.
i'm pretty sure you wouldn't work very long in some of the Bakery's i've been in for slave wages...i consider 10 bucks an hour slave wages in this example.
i'm pretty sure you wouldn't work very long in some of the Bakery's i've been in for slave wages...i consider 10 bucks an hour slave wages in this example.