southernsontn
Member
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2011
- Messages
- 35
The fairest free market solution for that teacher would be for him/her to find a job
at a non-union school instead of getting a "free lunch" at the union school. I don't believe in welfare or free lunches so I don't buy into "right to work."
I can agree with this. I am a union construction worker, and also a Ron Paul supporter. While I don't like the idea of forced unionism, I also believe that right to work laws, as written, take the situation too far to the extreme. Union work sites hire through the union. They call our hall and place an order for xx amount of workers. Every worker has signed a contract with the hall, stating that they intend to abide by the union rules. Under right to work, they can breach that contract at any time and the union can not. If someone hasn't paid their dues in six months, the union must still represent them in front of the bosses. that is unfair to the union, and it violates our right to association. These people absolutely have a right to work non-union, but if they wish to exercise that right, they should do so at a non union contractor. The fact of the matter is, Ron Paul still has my vote, regardless of his stance on unions