U.S. Senate votes for Indefinite, Unconstitutional Detention

so if something is unconstitutional, how is it even valid? ive always wondered this?
The congress can pass whatever they want. The President can sign whatever he wants. The Courts can declare whatever they want to be constitutional.

They've all taken an oath, but they all tend to hope the "other" branch will perform the checks and balances. So far, the Court has taken their oath most seriously since their not trying to win an election, but they still are haevily influenced by politics. Until Americans start appreciating the constitution, we can't expect our leaders to maintain any fidelity to it.
 
so if something is unconstitutional, how is it even valid? ive always wondered this?

blm_propaganda.jpg
 
This Mark Kirk from Illinois, is he pro-liberty on other issues? How long has he been in the Senate?
 
This Mark Kirk from Illinois, is he pro-liberty on other issues? How long has he been in the Senate?

Are you serious? Mark Kirk is in Scott Brown territory.
 
so if something is unconstitutional, how is it even valid? ive always wondered this?

Yeah, me too. Good question. If our rights are "inherent" no one can either give or take away those rights. (Unless it's by the point of a gun I assume) :mad:
 
Yeah, all those calls, letters, faxes and emails really slowed 'em down.

Just like TARP.

The scattered, bi-partisan support for this indicates that it's one of those votes where they all know it will pass (due to pressure from various elements of the establishment), but they need to spread the blame around.
 
Back
Top