2025 NDAA in Senate automatically registers women for conscription.

[Snowball]

07/08/2024 Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 433.
Action By: Senate

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/4638/all-actions

https://federalnewsnetwork.com/fede...utomatic-draft-registration-for-all-citizens/

I don't believe for a second that it will pass the Senate without amendment to change that automatic registration for Selective Service, at the very least the provision for all citizens (women) to be registered will have opposition among Democrats enough to be removed.

Still, a whore like Jack Reed who is spearheading this 2025 NDAA has no qualms about such a move. Jack is a willing slave to the military industrial complex. He has done nothing his entire career but make money off defense contractors, then try and pawn it off as "jobs". My uncle who has met him calls him "Jack Greed", and his sophisticated corruption has taken advantage of Rhode Island's naive Democrats for decades.

 

[TheCount]

Good

 

[Dr.3D]

So will people start identifying as birds to keep from being drafted?

 

[acptulsa]

Good

Definitely.

Be careful what you vote for, you might just be expected to go make it all happen and pay the price yourself.

 

[Snowball]

Good

Working off the naive assumption that it would make the public less willing to support military alliances and overseas commitments?

That assumption is predicated on a faulty expectation. They don't give a crap what we think.

 

[Voluntarist]

I don't believe for a second that it will pass the Senate without amendment to change that automatic registration for Selective Service,

Depending on the state you live in, you may already be automatically enrolled in the military draft when you apply for a driver's license or when you enroll in state-funded higher education ... see link

 

[Anti Globalist]

This is what happens you have women wanting equal rights.

 

[Snowball]

Depending on the state you live in, you may already be automatically enrolled in the military draft when you apply for a driver's license or when you enroll in state-funded higher education ... see link

Wow. I've never even heard of it. Certainly wasn't like that when I registered. I'm guessing this all happened after the Patriot Act and so on...

 

[TheCount]

Working off the naive assumption that it would make the public less willing to support military alliances and overseas commitments?

Nope.

 

[Snowball]

Nope.

then why is it "good" ?

 

[TheCount]

then why is it "good" ?

Women vote

 

[Snowball]

Women vote

I guess it would matter if they gave us any good choices to choose from.

 

[TheCount]

I guess it would matter if they gave us any good choices to choose from.

They're not sending their best

 

[Sonny Tufts]

Interesting history: in 1981 the Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision (Rostker v. Goldberg), held that exempting women from registering for the draft was constitutional and did not violate equal protection. The Court's rationale was that most of the military branches at that time barred women from combat and that the main reason for a registration was to prepare for a draft of combat troops.

In 2013, the U.S. military began removing restrictions on women in certain combat situations, and by 2015, had eliminated all restrictions barring women from combat. A new suit, brought by the National Coalition for Men, charged that with the removal of service restrictions, the Selective Service System's men-only requirement failed the Equal Protection clause. Judge Gray H. Miller of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas ruled in National Coalition for Men v. Selective Service System in February 2019 in favor of the plaintiffs, that the Service's men-only requirement was unconstitutional, though issued no order or injunction. Judge Miller wrote that while at the time Rostker was decided, women were banned from serving in combat, the situation has since changed with the 2013 and 2015 restriction removals. Miller's opinion was reversed by the Fifth Circuit, stating that only the Supreme Court could overturn the Supreme Court precedence from Rostker. The Supreme Court considered but declined to review the Fifth Circuit's ruling in June 2021. In an opinion authored by Justice Sonia Sotomayor and joined by Justices Stephen Breyer and Brett Kavanaugh, the three justices agreed that the male-only draft was likely unconstitutional given the changes in the military's stance on the roles, but because Congress had been reviewing and evaluating legislation to eliminate its male-only draft requirement via the National Commission on Military, National, and Public Service (NCMNPS) since 2016, it would have been inappropriate for the Court to act at that time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rostk....S. 57 (1981,for the draft was constitutional.

 

[oyarde]

Depending on the state you live in, you may already be automatically enrolled in the military draft when you apply for a driver's license or when you enroll in state-funded higher education ... see link

38 states linked to drivers licenses. Im assuming drivers permit / license still around 16, voting 18 so wat are tey doing ? Linking bday and registering at 18 ? In my state optional at drivers Lic , teyll do it for you if you like but not for lower education

 

[Anti Federalist]

38 states linked to drivers licenses. Im assuming drivers permit / license still around 16, voting 18 so wat are tey doing ? Linking bday and registering at 18 ? In my state optional at drivers Lic , teyll do it fo you if you like but not for lower education

What better way to get the invaders into the system, well armed, trained and under their control?

 

[oyarde]

What better way to get the invaders into the system, well armed, trained and under their control?

seems about rite most certainly, its a lock

 

[Anti Federalist]