U of Minn prof: "whiteness is an existential threat to the United States"

Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
117,583
This is a professor hired to teach the administration and other professors.

What I want to know is, what exactly, do you mean, Mizz Levy, when you say "whiteness must be decentered"?



UMN hosting prof to lecture on ‘the violence of whiteness’

https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=10632

Toni Airaksinen Today at 7:51 AM EDT

The University of Minnesota has invited a professor dedicated to “dismantling whiteness” to speak next week on how whiteness is an “existential threat” to the United States.

Lisa Anderson-Levy believes that "teaching is a political act," and will discuss ways to "decenter whiteness" at academic institutions.

The University of Minnesota has invited a professor dedicated to “dismantling whiteness” to speak next week on how whiteness is an “existential threat” to the United States.

“The Elephant in the Room: A ‘Grown Up’ Conversation about Whiteness” will be presented by Lisa Anderson-Levy, an Anthropology professor at Beloit College whose teaching philosophy is predicated on the belief that “teaching is a political act.”

"She argues that whiteness poses an existential threat to social, political, and economic life in the U.S."

During her lecture, Anderson-Levy is slated to speak on a number of issues, including “the violence of whiteness” and how colleges and universities in the United States may be complicit in perpetuating this violence.

“This presentation explores the ubiquity and violence of whiteness and the ways in which academic institutions are poised to either reproduce or interrupt these discourses,” writes Anderson-Levy, referring to herself in the third person.

“She argues that whiteness poses an existential threat to social, political, and economic life in the U.S. and proposes that decentering whiteness is one of the most urgent social dilemmas of our time and demands our immediate attention,” the abstract adds.

Anderson-Levy will also speak on how college administrators can “decenter whiteness” at their institutions, “including in our budgets, our curricula, our disciplinary genealogies, our interactions with students, and our relationships with each other as colleagues.”

Though the lecture appears geared towards college administrators, students are welcome to attend, and UNM spokeswoman Emmalynn Bauer confirmed to Campus Reform that the university is indeed sponsoring the lecture.

“The ICGC Alumni Lecture Series is an opportunity to highlight successful alumni and allow current students to engage with them,” Bauer said in a statement.

Campus Reform reached out to Anderson-Levy multiple times for comment, but did not receive a response in time for publication. In her post at nearby Beloit College, her academic interests include “feminist anthropology” and “activist anthropology.”

She is also the co-leader on a $600,000 project to foster “diversity, inclusivity, and equity” at Beloit College, which was funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.
 
Diversity? Inclusion? LOL.

No, this is about creating rifts and instilling white guilt into white students.

One challenge is how often I am surprised—and I guess I shouldn’t be—at how rarely white parents talk about race. This comes up every semester because race is a component of everything that I teach, but my reaction continues to be “wow, not at all, not in any context?”
...
For some of those students, as well as some students of color who have either been adopted by white parents or who have one white parent, talking about whiteness can be very challenging. Many of them believe it to be some kind of betrayal, or believe it means that since we’ve critiqued the horror or violence of whiteness, this means they shouldn’t love their parents.
...
So, what is my agenda? Paradigm shifting. I think it’s important for white people to think critically about whiteness and its operation all the time.
...
https://culanth.org/fieldsights/133...paradigm-shifts-and-the-ubiquity-of-whiteness
 
Lisa Anderson-Levy believes that "teaching is a political act..."

No, teaching is not a political act. Brainwashing is a political act. And mislabeling brainwashing as "teaching" is a whitewash.

Diversity? Inclusion? LOL.

No, this is about creating rifts and instilling white guilt into white students.

Orwell missed one. "Division is Unity".
 
Diversity? Inclusion? LOL.
One challenge is how often I am surprised—and I guess I shouldn’t be—at how rarely white parents talk about race. This comes up every semester because race is a component of everything that I teach, but my reaction continues to be “wow, not at all, not in any context?”
No, this is about creating rifts and instilling white guilt into white students.

These reason whites don't talk about race is that they are the only group that IS NOT supposed to take pride or acknowledge their historical background in any way except negatively.

fuck these racists.
 
Last edited:
These reason whites don't talk about race is that they are the only group that IS NOT supposed to take pride or acknowledge their historical background in any way except negatively.

fuck these racists.

It makes one wonder what the content and context is of these apparently frequent discussions of race that occur in non-white families?

This "professor" must mean that some families spend a lot of time complaining about other groups, and want to make sure that these other people individually acknowledge and accept the negative generalizations made about their group, beg forgiveness and think about their "crimes" at all times.
 
We will hear more and more of this as the left prepares it's zombies to kill us.

If we don't get CALExit and copycats for the rest of the deep blue states there will be a civil war, the left has decided to start one and nothing else will stop it.
 
The first goal of Education is to create fixed habits of reaction to authority.

This allows any information presented to divide the group and manufacture conflict, where the only thing the divided groups will agree on is that Govt is the only possible solution to resolve their conflict. They must feel the need of their group to protect them from the opposing group. Both groups will be taught Emotional Dependency so that they both try to cry to their owners to "tell the other group that I am right on this topic". Both will maintain the conflict by educators introducing any cause which contradicts their world views. Eventually, they will all abandon their own ideas due to the negative responses from their own identified groups when ideas that challenge their group leaders concepts and be taught to have positive responses when they willingly accept any ideas they believe will unify them, such as expansion of of their group by labeling their group as government with the intent of revoking the rights of the opposing groups. They will be dependent on the group for support and protection, while the group itself will never support their individuality. They must be made to be hopelessly dependent on those that divide people into conflicting groups.

Divide and Conquer. Think like a Manipulator does to genuinely resist their goals.
 
Back
Top