TruthInMedia Exclusive: Oath Keepers Reportedly Attacked By Law Enforcement And Rioters

[tod evans]

What does refusing to discuss Article V have to do with whether or not they keep their oaths?

Neither of us know that they're not discussing anything amongst sane individuals..

All there is in evidence is a nutjob claiming they won't discuss it with him when he wants....

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

What does refusing to discuss Article V have to do with whether or not they keep their oaths?

I goes you won't be intelligent enough to join, because you are supposed to understand the oath,
Article V is the only way to defend the constitution at this point.

http://www.military.com/join-armed-forces/swearing-in-for-military-service.html
The Oath of Enlistment (for enlisted): 

"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."

When people have to file lawsuits like this,

http://www.foavc.org/reference/doc4.pdf

It's clear that citizens and Article V are going to be the only defense. And soldiers have had lots of opportunity to discuss this, a lawful and peaceful defense of the constitution, but they can't. They are too afraid of command.

http://algoxy.com/ows/soldiersinquiry.html

BTW, no one at oath keepers would even comment. So WTF? Is it okay for soldiers to be given command by an unlawful military authority?

The only lawful military authority for America is one authorized by a constitutional civil government. Seen one of those lately?

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

Accountability anyone?

How many forums have banned you, over the years?

IIRC, you mentioned JREF, a previous sock puppet account here, Hannity's forum, and now OK's forum.

All for the same basic reasons, correct?

I've been banned from probably 50 forums, for not giving up with evidence, fact, truth and law. Here is a sample of my work filed in the US district court.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11title_18.disclosure.html

Gives you an idea of how effective you are. Where's your list of forums banned from for the same reasons?

Never been at Hannity. Just tried to register. Will they allow me? Or am I pre banned there too?

He was banned at DP.

And I immediately registered at city-data.com and another forum, where I was pre banned at both. DP is now gone, good riddance! Infested with covert agents or their equivalent prodigy

I like how this guy constantly in every post commits the very first cognitive distortion he lists. Thanks for warning us about yourself, Christopher A. Brown!

The first thing you have to learn, is you MUST quote the distortion if you allege there has been one. Second, the intention of the distortion is what makes it objectionable. Distortions which have a proven correct basis and reasonable facts show it, are merely linguistically efficient. When they are made to deceive of mislead, they are objectionable, even criminal, as in TREASON.

Neither of us know that they're not discussing anything amongst sane individuals..

All there is in evidence is a nutjob claiming they won't discuss it with him when he wants....

Uh, no one here got past being accountable for HOW Americans were intended to unify IF free speech was not to serve the purpose.

Care to give it a try, EVER?

 

[erowe1]

I goes you won't be intelligent enough to join

Pardon?

, because you are supposed to understand the oath,
Article V is the only way to defend the constitution at this point.

http://www.military.com/join-armed-forces/swearing-in-for-military-service.html
The Oath of Enlistment (for enlisted): 

"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."

When people have to file lawsuits like this,

http://www.foavc.org/reference/doc4.pdf

It's clear that citizens and Article V are going to be the only defense. And soldiers have had lots of opportunity to discuss this, a lawful and peaceful defense of the constitution, but they can't. They are too afraid of command.

http://algoxy.com/ows/soldiersinquiry.html

Where is the part that says they have to discuss Article V conventions in order not to violate the oath?

 

[Anti Federalist]

I've been banned from probably 50 forums, for not giving up with evidence, fact, truth and law. Here is a sample of my work filed in the US district court.

Did it ever occur to you that maybe, just maybe, the problem lies with you, and not with all of us?

I'm glad RPF has a light hand at the ban hammer, and hope, in time, that maybe you'll see that we're not agents or InSiNcErE, but just do not find much merit in your plan, such as it has been explained.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

Pardon?



Where is the part that says they have to discuss Article V conventions in order not to violate the oath?

OMG!

Defense of the constitution includes "whatever".

And I provided a link showing congress is violating the constitution by not calling a convention. Catch up!

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

Did it ever occur to you that maybe, just maybe, the problem lies with you, and not with all of us?

Long ago, way before rpf. When I saw unaccountability, while I am accountable, that dilemma went away.

I'm glad RPF has a light hand at the ban hammer, and hope, in time, that maybe you'll see that we're not agents or InSiNcErE, but just do not find much merit in your plan, such as it has been explained.

So what is the great sacrifice in simply agreeing and accepting that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity required to alter or abolish government destructive to your unalienable rights, like your life?

And in case you've forgotten AGAIN, that is not the only purpose. It's the ultimate purpose, like in - or your dead and all lessor purposes don't matter.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Long ago, way before rpf. When I saw unaccountability, while I am accountable, that dilemma went away.

That makes no sense.

Accountable to whom?

Yourself?

God?

Zuul?

So what is the great sacrifice in simply agreeing and accepting that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity required to alter or abolish government destructive to your unalienable rights, like your life?

And in case you've forgotten AGAIN, that is not the only purpose. It's the ultimate purpose, like in - or your dead and all lessor purposes don't matter.

You say you have a great memory, and use it, to pin all us "agents" to the mat.

But you seem to have forgotten that I have agreed to that premise, numerous times already.

Why do you forgot that?

 

[acptulsa]

OMG!

Defense of the constitution includes "whatever".

And I provided a link showing congress is violating the constitution by not calling a convention. Catch up!

He said 'defense of the constitution includes "whatever"' but never actually used the word 'whatever' or any of its synonyms. Oath Keepers cannot preserve, protect and defend the Constitution without calling a convention for the purpose of altering or abolishing the Constitution, and the Constitution must call for Congress to call a constitutional convention because you provided a link to you saying so yourself on your own website, therefore your opinion is fact because it's backed up by your opinion.

And there's no point in using mind control techniques because you know them all; you've amateurishly tried to use them all on us. Like when you link your own website to reinforce your hare-brained opinions. And when you claim that anyone who disagrees with you isn't one of the 'cool kids', the way we all remember the bullies doing in elementary school.

Am I caught up yet? And now that I am caught up, will you please stop spamming and let us have an adult conversation already?

 

[tod evans]

Uh, no one here got past being accountable for HOW Americans were intended to unify IF free speech was not to serve the purpose.

Care to give it a try, EVER?

Who do you think anyone here should be accountable to?

Use only one word to answer.....



I hold that you are unaccountable!

You are the cognitive infiltrator who attempts to engage others in "peaceful" revolution when the wise men who drafted the constitution, you claim to adhere to, understood full well there can never be a "peaceful" revolution.

Calling for votes in the face of tyranny is, at best chickenshit, at worst a means to try and acquire names....


So I must ask;

Are you Chris Brown a chickenshit or a list making cognitive infiltrator? Or both?

 

[CPUd]

 

[acptulsa]

Are you Chris Brown a chickenshit or a list making cognitive infiltrator? Or both?

Where's the choice for 'a masochist who loves being pwned and humiliated over and over'?

 

[tod evans]

Where's the choice for 'a masochist who loves being pwned and humiliated over and over'?

He'll get confused over a simple choice and try to obfuscate the question as it sits..

 

[acptulsa]

He'll get confused over a simple choice and try to obfuscate the question as it sits..

Well, considering he still thinks we're dazed and confused by his ten-dollar words even after the umpteenth hundred time we've made fun of him for being unable to string them into a coherent sentence, yeah, you're probably right.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Plague infested squirrels at Yosemite

About a week ago, officials said a child fell ill with the plague at Yosemite National Park. Now a popular campground there will be closed after several squirrels were killed by the disease.

The plague-infected squirrels were found in the Tuolumne Meadows Campground, about 40 miles west of Crane Flat Campground, where the child was camping with family.

In an “extremely precautionary public health measure,” park officials will apply flea insecticide to rodent burrows. As a result they are closing the campground from noon Monday to noon Friday, Aug. 21.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

That makes no sense.

Accountable to whom?

Yourself?

God?

Zuul?



You say you have a great memory, and use it, to pin all us "agents" to the mat.

But you seem to have forgotten that I have agreed to that premise, numerous times already.

Why do you forgot that?

Accountability doesn't care "to who".

You agreed only to alter or abolish and your agreement with free speech was not that alter or abolish was the ULTIMATE, it was that alex or abolish was not the only purpose. Since then, you've not been accountable to any reason relating to the question or your answer.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...-Commutation&p=5946200&viewfull=1#post5946200

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...-Giant-stage&p=5947153&viewfull=1#post5947153

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

Where's the choice for 'a masochist who loves being pwned and humiliated over and over'?

The best of you folks do not know what you are doing. And your failure to use reason to justify it shows it.

No to mention you do not realize that you use cognitive distortions without knowing it.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

Where's the choice for 'a masochist who loves being pwned and humiliated over and over'?

I am Chris Brown that can reasonably back everything I say and do. But you and yours are not even reasonable or accountable enough to admit you read it.

 

[phill4paul]

The best of you folks do not know what you are doing. And your failure to use reason to justify it shows it.

No to mention you do not realize that you use cognitive distortions without knowing it.

 

[Occam's Banana]

The best of you folks do not know what you are doing. And your failure to use reason to justify it shows it. No to mention you do not realize that you use cognitive distortions without knowing it.

I am Chris Brown that can reasonably back everything I say and do. But you and yours are not even reasonable or accountable enough to admit you read it.