TruthInMedia Exclusive: Oath Keepers Reportedly Attacked By Law Enforcement And Rioters

[William Tell]

Chris, you are the one dong the most whining and complaining, and worse, calling everyone here who has ever done anything productive an agent. You couldn't unify a basket of fruit, let alone a political movement.

 

[Dr.3D]

Chris, you are the one dong the most whining and complaining, and worse, calling everyone here who has ever done anything productive an agent. You couldn't unify a basket of fruit, let alone a political movement.

I seriously doubt he is trying to unify. Looks more like he is trying to disrupt.

 

[Origanalist]

I seriously doubt he is trying to unify. Looks more like he is trying to disrupt.

He's a sincere American with a mission.

 

[Dr.3D]

He's a sincere American with a mission.

The question is, "what kind of mission?"

 

[William Tell]

He's a sincere American with a mission.

Do you agree and accept that the purpose of Christopher A. Brown is to unify and instruct us of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?


Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of Christopher A. Brown is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish?

 

[Origanalist]

Do you agree and accept that the purpose of Christopher A. Brown is to unify and instruct us of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?


Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of Christopher A. Brown is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish?

Lol, I'm dying here.

 

[Origanalist]

Sorry about derailing the thread. This is SOP for these situations now, The police stand down and let the destruction go on and go after anyone with the temerity to try and stop it. It's almost like they want it to happen......

 

[Occam's Banana]

Do you agree and accept that the purpose of Christopher A. Brown is to unify and instruct us of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?

Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of Christopher A. Brown is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish?

..

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to William Tell again.

 

[phill4paul]

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to William Tell again...

No worries...

You cannot give Reputation to the same post twice.

So did we change the Cog-Infil InSinCeRe Americans meeting to Waffle house instead of the Golden Corral this month?

 

[CPUd]

Unaccountability appears to be the only mode of interaction. Here is some rep that should be a comment in a thread where I can reply. So I've taken a screen shot of the rep and am posting it.

Uh, I've asked dozens of times for a description, plan, strategy for an agenda to "take back our country", and NO ONE has ever produced a coherent plan, let alone one that has legal veracity.

Ironically, the plan I present is coherent and it has legal veracity. The very first thing it needs is citizen agreement upon prime constitutional intents.

Do you agree and accept that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?

Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish?

Apparently there is something too functional about this idea, and people prefer whining and complaining, because it will actually cause no change.

 

[pcosmar]

It's almost like they want it to happen......

I have said that from the beginning.

 

[timosman]

Where do I sign up ?

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

Where do I sign up ?

It's only for people that support liberty, rights and freedom unconditionally, overtly.

Are you sure the requirements aren't too much for you?

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

Led by Sam Andrews, these brave men carried out their mission, and the journalists they were guarding were kept safe in the midst of yet another Ferguson, Missouri, riot.

That definitely is a valuable service, and yes, they are very professional.

I'm not happy they banned me from
their first forum for promoting Article V, but I do recognize their courage and professionalism.

Because there are limits to the organizations capacity to discuss the oath, the breadth of what "keeping it" really entails or means, adding LTD after the name would be a more honest presentation. Even if it were a non involved or committed role, the unity they could engender by accountably engaging dialog is needed.

 

[Anti Federalist]

I'm not happy they banned me from
their first forum for promoting Article V

How many forums have banned you, over the years?

IIRC, you mentioned JREF, a previous sock puppet account here, Hannity's forum, and now OK's forum.

All for the same basic reasons, correct?

 

[William Tell]

How many forums have banned you, over the years?

IIRC, you mentioned JREF, a previous sock puppet account here, Hannity's forum, and now OK's forum.

All for the same basic reasons, correct?

He was banned at DP.

 

[Working Poor]

I like Ben Swan's reporting but I hate his web site. I had to unsubscribe from his newsletter because it almost took down my computer. I couldn't read the article because of a pop up that insisted on registering to win 500 in gold doesn't have a "no thanks" button.

 

[SewrRatt]

COGNITIVE DISTORTIONS


A) All or nothing thinking- Things are placed in black or white categories.(*) If things are less than perfect self is viewed as failure.



I like how this guy constantly in every post commits the very first cognitive distortion he lists. Thanks for warning us about yourself, Christopher A. Brown!

 

[acptulsa]

I like how this guy constantly in every post commits the very first cognitive distortion he lists. Thanks for warning us about yourself, Christopher A. Brown!

This.

Gotta give him props. Not every spammer will tell you exactly what method of establishment-approved mind control he is amateurishly trying to use on you.

 

[erowe1]

The oath keepers have a conditional agenda because they refuse to discuss Article V and they are really not "keeping the oath". They are selectively NOT following orders that violate clauses of the oath.

What does refusing to discuss Article V have to do with whether or not they keep their oaths?