Trump’s second travel ban blocked by 2 judges

[AuH20]

 

[Dr.3D]

He needs to take those judges to court

Or maybe fire them and appoint better ones.

 

[TheTexan]

He needs to take those judges to court

Charge them with Contempt

 

[oyarde]

Trump just needs to issue executive orders faster than judges can strike it down.

He should go ahead and get started on the next one.

I would have everything I wanted typed up and then decide at breakfast what I wanted released three days at a time and go fishing .

 

[oyarde]

Do you believe that is a power that the President has and/or should have?

No real need for a President at all if you could get congress and the senate to follow the law . That job could be left unfilled as part of budget cuts.

 

[phill4paul]

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

 

[TheCount]

No real need for a President at all if you could get congress and the senate to follow the law . That job could be left unfilled as part of budget cuts.

Based on Trump's travel budget, that would be a larger cut than most in his budget.

 

[helmuth_hubener]

Ooooh, did some poor statist get triggered?

I don't know. Find me one? Then we can cross-examine him.

 

[helmuth_hubener]

When you say the State ought to do something

And did he say that the State should do something? Did RonPaulGeorge&Ringo say that? Or are you putting words into his mouth?

Obviously you are putting words into his mouth.

Point. Set. Match. Done.

I still love ya, Pierz!

 

[helmuth_hubener]

Do you believe that is a power that the President has and/or should have?

Who cares?

Are you caring now what I believe?

If so, great, but let me tell you who doesn't:

1. Trump
2. Congress
3. The courts
4. Anyone with influence in Washington, D.C.

 

[AngryCanadian]

Or maybe fire them and appoint better ones.

Firing them would be better after all those judges were hand picked by the Obama admin right?

 

[TheCount]

Who cares?

Are you caring now what I believe?

If so, great, but let me tell you who doesn't:

1. Trump
2. Congress
3. The courts
4. Anyone with influence in Washington, D.C.

Then why discuss anything at all? Should just close down the forum until such time as we're all Congressmen.

 

[helmuth_hubener]

Then why discuss anything at all?

Oh, to bounce ideas around, cross-pollinate, maybe become better friends and better people.

Anyway, my post was more in the spirit of analysis and prediction, not recommendation. Sorry if I confused you.

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

These Communist assh0les are doing jurisprudence like it's an Internet comments argument. If you don't have the facts or the law, just stamp your feet and call everyone a racist.

[/QUOTE][/IMG]

 

[Firestarter]

The Trump administration has appealed the federal court order issued in Maryland (that blocks part of the president’s revised travel ban).
The federal appeals court (fourth circuit) has set arguments for May 8, which makes it unlikely that it will decide soon: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/donald-trump-travel-ban-appeals-court-236435

The Trump administration didn’t appeal the Hawaii ruling, so that one isn’t challenged.
Some say they won’t challenge that one because that would be decided by the ninth circuit court that already ruled against the first travel ban. Maybe they have a bigger chance that the fourth court will rule in their favour.
To me not appealing the other order, confirms that the whole travel ban is a charade. Even if the Maryland order is squashed in appeal, the Hawaii ruling blocks the executive order.

 

[CPUd]

Hawaii judge extends national halt on Trump's travel ban

Jaweed Kaleem

The Hawaii federal judge who brought President Trump's revised travel ban to a national halt this month extended his order blocking the ban's enforcement.

The move Wednesday sets the stage for the Justice Department to appeal to the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse the ruling.

U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson's original order halting the travel ban was issued March 15, a day before the ban was to go into effect, in the form of a temporary restraining order.

At a hearing in Honolulu on Wednesday, federal lawyers asked Watson to either dismiss that order or narrow the restrictions to apply to fewer parts of the travel ban.

Instead, Watson said he would turn the order into a preliminary injunction, which has the effect of extending his order blocking the travel ban for a longer period.

Watson said he would keep intact the restrictions on the travel ban -- a block of its 90-day moratorium on travel to the U.S. from nationals of six majority-Muslim countries and its 120-day pause on new refugee resettlement.

If the Justice Department appeals the case, it will be heard in the same court that upheld a national halt to Trump's first travel ban last month after a Seattle federal judge ruled against it.

The administration has already appealed to the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals a Maryland judge's more limited March 16 ruling that stopped enforcement of the travel order's country-specific ban.

Both the Hawaii and Maryland judges found Trump's executive order to discriminate against Muslims. They used the president's campaign statements promising to suspend Muslim travel to the U.S. as evidence of the order's anti-Muslim bias.

Government lawyers have argued that the president is not singling out Muslims but instead acting within his power to restrict immigration and safeguard national security while better vetting procedures are developed to prevent potential terrorists from entering the U.S.

Trump has said he'll take the case over the travel ban to the U.S. Supreme Court.

http://www.latimes.com/politics/was...-judge-trump-travel-1490816530-htmlstory.html

 

[timosman]

Trump should close Gitmo and send everybody to Hawaii.

 

[CPUd]

 

[timosman]

CPUd - a man without class.

 

[CPUd]