Trump Unleashes Tariffs On Mexico "Until Illegal Immigration Stops"

[PierzStyx]

We know that is their goal. Make the US into a 3rd world $#@!-hole.

Yes because the "Elites" make so much more money when the nation is completely impoverished and in a constant state of civil war. /s

Talk about incoherent idiocy.

 

[Swordsmyth]

I know illegal immigrants who speak English better than you. For example, they know the definition of "invade," which you apparently do not.

Then again, maybe idiocy isn't the problem. You being a troll whose job is the purposeful spread of propaganda, your destruction of the language is probably purposeful.

I am using invade perfectly correctly, your side is the one attempting to redefine it.

History is full of invasions conducted by simply moving in on the targeted victims and then imposing the invaders' rule.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Yes because the "Elites" make so much more money when the nation is completely impoverished and in a constant state of civil war. /s

Talk about incoherent idiocy.

They have more money than they know what to do with, this is about power.

And they plan on restoring peace and order once they have broken the liberty and independence of the American people.

But you know all of that already because you are part of it.

 

[RestorationOfLiberty]

"If you are against Trump's wall you are for open borders!" is just as silly.

Only, its not. Walls work to control borders, if you oppose what works, you can not claim to support secure borders, therefore by default support open borders.

Stop lying you nation wreaking mistake.

 

[donnay]

Yes because the "Elites" make so much more money when the nation is completely impoverished and in a constant state of civil war. /s

Talk about incoherent idiocy.

Isn't it your position to have open borders? What would define your thinking from the "elite" thinking?

 

[RestorationOfLiberty]

Yes because the "Elites" make so much more money when the nation is completely impoverished and in a constant state of civil war. /s

Talk about incoherent idiocy.

You really do assume its all about money rather then what money buys which is power

 

[RestorationOfLiberty]

Isn't it your position to have open borders? What would define your thinking from the "elite" thinking?

Nothing, because he is a useful idiot. He just refuse to accept that no all people are the same, that the blank slate is a lie, that genes determine in large part a person ability, that it determines culture, and that culture determines politics, and that elections have consequences.

He really does think that some how we can "get rid of welfare" (never explains how, it will "just happen"....somehow) and this will some how bring about a utopia, that some how people will rise above their biology, that water will turn to wine, and the lion will infact lay down with the lamb...

That if in fact he is outnumbered, he will just repeat the same augments enough and that some how the invaders will "see the light", that they will some how "just get it", never mind all the data that proves this to be the case...

To him, if America dies its not because we refused to defend it or people like him stabbing it n the back, it is "our fault" for not "doing a better job" at "spreading our message", never mind that some messages are not meant for other people, cultures, etc...But hey "at least GDP increased by 0.005% this quarter".

 

[RestorationOfLiberty]

https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/04/politics/republican-opposition-mexico-tariffs/

Primary them all.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Nothing, because he is a useful idiot. He just refuse to accept that no all people are the same, that the blank slate is a lie, that genes determine in large part a person ability, that it determines culture, and that culture determines politics, and that elections have consequences.

He really does think that some how we can "get rid of welfare" (never explains how, it will "just happen"....somehow) and this will some how bring about a utopia, that some how people will rise above their biology, that water will turn to wine, and the lion will infact lay down with the lamb...

That if in fact he is outnumbered, he will just repeat the same augments enough and that some how the invaders will "see the light", that they will some how "just get it", never mind all the data that proves this to be the case...

To him, if America dies its not because we refused to defend it or people like him stabbing it n the back, it is "our fault" for not "doing a better job" at "spreading our message", never mind that some messages are not meant for other people, cultures, etc...But hey "at least GDP increased by 0.005% this quarter".

I no longer believe Pierz is a fool, he is an enemy in disguise.

Never attribute to stupidity that which is better explained by malice.

 

[RestorationOfLiberty]

I no longer believe Pierz is a fool, he is an enemy in disguise.

Never attribute to stupidity that which is better explained by malice.

You are right.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Mexico showed yet another act of good faith on Thursday - freezing the bank accounts of 26 alleged human traffickers.

The ministry's Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) said in a statement it froze the accounts due to "probable links with human trafficking and illegal aid to migrant caravans."
The FIU added that it would present the cases to the Attorney General's office. -Reuters
​

Negotiators from both countries are discussing a new framework that would "dramatically increase Mexico's immigration enforcement efforts" according to the Washington Post.
Mexican officials have pledged to deploy 6,000 National Guard troops to the country's southern border with Guatemala. We wonder - will Congressional Democrats pounce on Mexico for this decision like they did when President Trump did it?

​

The Mexican official and the U.S. official said the countries are negotiating a sweeping plan to overhaul asylum rules across the region, a move that would require Central Americans to seek refuge in the first foreign country they set foot upon after fleeing their homeland.
Under such a plan, the United States would swiftly deport Guatemalan asylum seekers who set foot on U.S. soil to Mexico. And the United States would send Honduran and Salvadoran asylum applicants to Guatemala, whose government held talks with acting Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan last week. -Washington Post
​

In addition to the deployment of the National Guard, Mexico has promised to build more migrant detention centers and checkpoints to catch and deter northbound Central Americans.

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019...rants-southern-border-after-tariff-talks-tank

 

[Zippyjuan]

Only, its not. Walls work to control borders, if you oppose what works, you can not claim to support secure borders, therefore by default support open borders.

Stop lying you nation wreaking mistake.

Ron Paul favors Open Borders!

 

[RestorationOfLiberty]

Ron Paul favors Open Borders!

Only he doesnt, it has been shown in this tread alone that he does not, and even if he did/does he is still very wrong.

Not sure where that would come off as a "killshot" expect the mind of a sperg or a open border/anti white leftist

 

[Zippyjuan]

Only he doesnt, it has been shown in this tread alone that he does not, and even if he did/does he is still very wrong.

Not sure where that would come off as a "killshot" expect the mind of a sperg or a open border/anti white leftist

But according to you, anybody who is against Trump's wall is for open borders.

Walls work to control borders, if you oppose what works, you can not claim to support secure borders, therefore by default support open borders.

Ron opposes Trump's wall- therefore, according to you, he must be for open borders. Unless you were lying again.

https://moneyandmarkets.com/paul-dont-need-border-wall-illegal-immigration/

Ron Paul: We Don’t Need a Border Wall to Stop Illegal Immigration


Three-time presidential candidate and Texas Libertarian Ron Paul said Tuesday on CNBC that we don’t need a border wall to stop illegal immigration along the southern border, and should instead focus efforts on removing incentives for coming to the U.S. illegally.

More at link.

 

[RestorationOfLiberty]

But according to you, anybody who is against Trump's wall is for open borders.



Ron opposes Trump's wall- therefore, according to you, he must be for open borders. Unless you were lying again.

https://moneyandmarkets.com/paul-dont-need-border-wall-illegal-immigration/



More at link.

No, anyone who is against border walls is for open borders borders by default, stop lying you nation wreaker.

And yet he voted FOR building a wall. Go be a shill somewhere else, I hear Mexico is an Ancap paradise.

 

[invisible]

he is still very wrong.

No, anyone who is against border walls is for open borders borders by default

More direct opposition to Ron Paul from the shylls, right here on RPF, fully sanctioned by the site owners and mods.

 

[PAF]

More direct opposition to Ron Paul from the shylls, right here on RPF, fully sanctioned by the site owners and mods.

That about sums it up.

Like Private Property and Contract Rights, they read the Site Mission, but fully ignore it.

 

[nikcers]

More direct opposition to Ron Paul from the shylls, right here on RPF, fully sanctioned by the site owners and mods.

Have you tried to report them? I think its good to engage people but not when they are obviously nihilists

 

[Zippyjuan]

No, anyone who is against border walls is for open borders borders by default, stop lying you nation wreaker.

And yet he voted FOR building a wall. Go be a shill somewhere else, I hear Mexico is an Ancap paradise.

Ron Paul is against the wall, therefore he is for open borders.

Yes, Ron did vote for a bill which funded a wall but he said he was against that part of the bill- that he voted for it due to its anti-amnesty provisions.

 

[invisible]

I know illegal immigrants who speak English better than you. For example, they know the definition of "invade," which you apparently do not.

Then again, maybe idiocy isn't the problem. You being a troll whose job is the purposeful spread of propaganda, your destruction of the language is probably purposeful.

Of course it's deliberate. That's exactly what propagandists do, is to present everything in the terms designed to evoke a strong and specific emotional reaction. And do it for over 36 posts per day, or over 41,000 posts in 3 years, far more than even the most prolific genuine Ron Paul supporters who have been here for over a decade. Despite how totally obvious this propagandist is, this is fully sanctioned by the site owner and mods.