Trump Threatens Pro-Paul, Conservative Group With Multi-million Dollar Lawsuit!

BGfree said:
Thanks for the link. I learned from it one of The Club for Growth's founders, Stephen Moore is a member of the Heritage Foundation,..a neocon think tank.
Click to expand...

They are not Neocons nor are they libertarians. They have supported monetarily pro-liberty people like Amash, Lee and Rand in the past.
 
I'm getting real tired of hearing about Donald Trump and I'm hoping that Club For Growth sinks him like a stone in the ocean. But even more so still, I'm really sick of supposed "liberty proponents" on this forum making really bad excuses for this left-wing, tax and spend Democrat plant.

Trump doesn't have a case, he's made statements supporting higher taxes within the time that he declared his presidency and then tried to excuse it by saying he'll only go after certain "wealthy" people (hedge fund people), that sounds like Bernie Sanders crap to me. Trump belongs on the Democrat Primary Debate stage with Hillary Clinton, and the people worshiping Trump on here and defaming The Heritage Foundation belong over there with him.
 
All of this stuff about Club for Growth and The Heritage Foundation was hashed out years ago. Is it just being ignored or are people unaware?

I'm surprised to see them being defended at this late date.
 
BGfree said:
All of this stuff about Club for Growth and The Heritage Foundation was hashed out years ago. Is it just being ignored or are people unaware?

I'm surprised to see them being defended at this late date.
Click to expand...

If the Heritage Foundation says that George Washington was a man, does that mean he wasn't?
 
BGfree said:
All of this stuff about Club for Growth and The Heritage Foundation was hashed out years ago. Is it just being ignored or are people unaware?

I'm surprised to see them being defended at this late date.
Click to expand...

You do realize that Donald Trump was equally hostile towards Ron Paul as these organizations were, in fact more so. If you were critiquing these organizations for attacking Rand Paul, you might have something, but given they are attacking a Liberal Democrat Tycoon, I don't see where you get off lecturing anybody on defending anything at any date.
 
And...good old Kahless gave me a negative rep. Not so bothered by it as I've done it to him a couple times and fair is fair, but I think his message to me is fairly telling.

for your anti-liberty approach to silence discussion of opposing candidates such as Trump.
Click to expand...

I wasn't aware that saying that I'm tired of hearing about the S.O.B. and giving negative rep to people who flood this section with comments praising him was "silencing discussion". The whole issue here is that this forum doesn't get a moment's peace from this rubbish, it's literally turning into an MSM echo-chamber, and apparently my view on this fact has made me an enemy of "free speech". Oh the horror!
 
hells_unicorn said:
And...good old Kahless gave me a negative rep. Not so bothered by it as I've done it to him a couple times and fair is fair, but I think his message to me is fairly telling.

I wasn't aware that saying that I'm tired of hearing about the S.O.B. and giving negative rep to people who flood this section with comments praising him was "silencing discussion". The whole issue here is that this forum doesn't get a moment's peace from this rubbish, it's literally turning into an MSM echo-chamber, and apparently my view on this fact has made me an enemy of "free speech". Oh the horror!
Click to expand...

The thread and post in question was that I agree about alternative opinions being silenced by the group think mentality in this forum. You negging me only proves you and those here are trying to silence alternative opinions on topics.

There are less and less people participating and posting here every day. If that kind of behavior, (your kind of behavior continues) you will be having these discussions in an echo chamber.
 
This case will get thrown out because the usual standards of libel don't apply to political speech in this country. If Trump couldn't stand the heat, he should have scrounged up (or bought) enough sense to stay out of a political race.

In the unlikely case the trial even happens, the truth is always a defense against a libel suit. And that's that. Trump will be lucky if the judge doesn't come down on his head for wasting the court's time.

Next case!
 
Sounds to me Trump is getting desperate or maybe he just blabs too much without having a sound philosophy and that egomaniac mouth of his is catching up.

Lord, if he can't take the little heat in an early run for the nomination, how is he going to handle a general election or the world if elected. Sue?

Maybe Rand should sue for his "Rand shouldn't be up on stage cause he is at 1%." That was a bold face LIE.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

TheCount
Donald Trump threatens 100% tariff on countries that turn away from the dollar
2 3 4
Replies
74
Views
30K
Matt Collins
Matt Collins
jmdrake
Supreme Court rules against Trump on foreign aid, spelling potential problems for DOGE
Replies
9
Views
174
nobody's_hero
nobody's_hero
PAF
Freedom from Digital Hell Depends on Trump’s “Multiple Personality Disorder”
Replies
0
Views
476
PAF
PAF
Anti Federalist
Trump floats eliminating U.S. income tax and replacing it with tariffs on imports
6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
20K
acptulsa
acptulsa
PAF
How Donald Trump and Kamala Harris want to change your taxes
Replies
1
Views
684
unknown
unknown
Back
Top