Trump sent a letter to Iran's Supreme Leader expressing an interest in negotiating a nuclear deal

Swordsmyth

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2016
Messages
74,737
U.S. President Donald Trump said he sent a letter to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei expressing an interest in negotiating a nuclear deal, according to a Fox Business interview with Trump that aired on March 7. ...


Broken link: https:// worldview.stratfor .com/situation-report/iran-trump-writes-letter-khamenei-expressing-interest-new-nuclear-deal
 
Basically its a thinly veiled threat to Iran to give up its nuclear weapons, .. or else

 
Denuclearization based on a failed "wilsonian" multilateral world order imposing denuclearization just doesn't work. This was predicted by many people to be just a failed concept half measure and security theater. Richard Nixon predicted this model to be a failure when as he said it the Soviet Union committed suicide in the 90s and he released the book "Seize the moment" and gave interviews about it. The Wilsonian model failed to prevent World War 2 and it will fail to prevent a nuclear weapon armed middle east.
 
The Iran nuclear deal was just a scam to unfreeze those funds so they would enter the global markets. This idea is based on the revisionist history that the economic conditions that were imposed on Germany after World War 1, the versailles treaty is what lead to war with Germany.

The truth is that World War 2 and war against Germany would have happened no matter how great their economy was doing. That was just what the Germans were going to do.


Just because they were no longer a Monarchy and they were a democracy that doesn't make a people any more peaceful.


Iran's theocracy government will spread and they will go to war and expand and making a nuclear deal won't change that.
 
Witkoff confirms to Fox: Trump is seeking to limit Iran's enrichment to 3.67% - just as the JCPOA did.

Israel wanted Trump to blow up Iran's nuclear program (which would lead to war). Trump said no.

Trump correctly put US interests ahead of Israel's on this issue. pic.twitter.com/9auNJFMDWl
— Trita Parsi (@tparsi) April 15, 2025

Code:
https://twitter.com/tparsi/status/1911969596799672422

 
Netanyahu's Washington trip got a surprise gut punch when Trump revealed the United States and Iran were about to begin negotiations on a nuclear agreement without Israel.

Code:
https://twitter.com/Jerusalem_Post/status/1912656606723990012

 
Netanyahu's Washington trip got a surprise gut punch when Trump revealed the United States and Iran were about to begin negotiations on a nuclear agreement without Israel.

Code:
https://twitter.com/Jerusalem_Post/status/1912656606723990012



I just read that article. It was written by a lobbyist and former legislative director for AIPAC.

The takeaway is to expect a deal, and that AIPAC for the first time in a long time is OK with it, despite Netanyahu and the Israeli far-right's wishes.

This is a positive, but the Gaza situation is far from a resolution. Iran is going to have to hold back because it's just going to get worse.
Israel is demanding no less than the complete disarmament of Hamas, and a large, perhaps 90-100% evacuation of Gaza. What that's going to look like in military terms is TBD.
 
April 16, 2025

.

The report said that Vice President JD Vance told the president that he had a unique opportunity to reach a deal with Iran, but he said that if the negotiations failed, Trump could then support the Israeli attack.

.

... and leaning toward bombing Iran, even though US intelligence agencies have recently reaffirmed there’s no evidence Iran is building a nuclear weapon.

.

Trump has repeatedly threatened to bomb Iran and is currently conducting a major bombing campaign in Yemen. In recent weeks, the US has deployed additional bombers, another aircraft carrier, and other air assets to threaten Iran. Those assets are also being used to ramp up attacks on Yemen.

.

Hawks in the US and Israel are pushing for a deal that would involve the full dismantlement of Iran’s civilian nuclear program, which is a non-starter for Tehran. Witkoff recently suggested the US would be happy with a deal to limit Iranian enrichment to 3.67%, but he appeared to walk that back the following day, saying any agreement must “eliminate nuclear enrichment” altogether.


news.antiwar.com/2025/04/16/report-trump-declined-to-back-israeli-attack-on-iran-in-favor-of-diplomacy/
 
Back
Top