Trump says he wants immigrants 'who speak English' and won't 'collect welfare'

Zippyjuan

Banned
Joined
Feb 5, 2008
Messages
49,008
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-aims-cut-legal-immigration-legislation/story?id=48985055

Trump's own Grandfather came to the US a broke teen (sixteen years old) and unable to speak English (he was German). He would reject his own ancestor. His grandmother was Scottish but used mostly the local drogue and had troubles with English too. If what Trump wants was in effect back then, Trump would likely not be in the US.

President Trump introduced legislation today with Sens. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., and David Perdue, R-Ga., aimed at cutting legal immigration to the United States.

The bill — a revised version of an immigration-reform bill introduced in February — would change the system for granting legal residency, or green cards, by giving priority to high-skilled, English-speaking immigrants.

"This competitive application process will favor applicants who can speak English, financially support themselves and their families and demonstrate skills that will contribute to our economy," Trump said today at the White House alongside Cotton and Perdue.

Trump, who promised during his election campaign to reform the immigration system, argued that the bill, called the Reforming American Immigration for Strong Employment (RAISE) Act, would replace "our low-skilled [immigration] system with a points-based system."

"They're not going to come in and immediately go and collect welfare," he said.

Under a 1996 welfare reform bill signed by President Clinton, legal immigrants are already barred from receiving government benefits for five years or longer. Some exceptions include children and human trafficking victims who allowed to collect certain benefits.

The RAISE Act would establish a point-based system for issuing green cards and would give more points to people who are highly skilled — which, Trump suggested, would reduce the number of immigrants receiving government benefits.

http://theweek.com/articles/580042/ancestral-immigrant-history-antiimmigrant-crusader-donald-trump

Like most Americans, Donald Trump comes from immigrant stock, and as in most families, their story is a complicated one, with many chapters. But during Trump's anti-immigrant tirades, he failed to mention even such basics as the fact that his mother, Mary Anne McLeod Trump, was born in Scotland, that he is named after a Scotsman (a maternal uncle), and that he has boasted of his tie to this foreign country repeatedly when publicizing his golf courses there.

More important, his black-and-white denunciations give no hint that his financial empire traces its origins back to the shrewdness with which his grandfather, Friedrich Trump, finagled his way around the rough-and-tumble New World after emigrating from the small German village of Kallstadt. The year was 1885, and Friedrich, who was only 16 when he landed in New York City, belonged to a wave of German immigrants that, again according to the Pew Research Center, made that country the largest source of newcomers to the U.S. for more than four decades.

Being born in Germany wasn't a problem when Friedrich arrived in the United States. He went on to become an American citizen and to amass a nest egg — the first Trump family fortune — by "mining the miners" in Seattle and the Yukon during the gold-rush era. Rather than dig for ore himself, he opened restaurants, often in the red-light district, and supplied booze and easy access to women. Although such behavior does not rise to the level of the criminal activity grandson Donald claims is rampant among immigrants from Mexico, the local North West Mounted Police superintendent found it unacceptable — and in 1901, when he announced a clean-up, Friedrich pulled up stakes and headed back to New York.

That's when he hit his first major bump in the road, in the form of a dilemma that often arises in immigrant communities: Friedrich had adjusted to life in his new home, but his wife Elizabeth, also from Kallstadt, had not. Although Germans were the biggest ethnic group in the U.S. and New York City had the third-largest number of German speakers in the world, behind only Berlin and Vienna, Elizabeth was desperately homesick. Friedrich did his best to make her feel at home in the U.S., but ultimately, in 1904, he, Elizabeth, and their infant daughter headed back to Germany — what Mitt Romney would have called "voluntary self-deportation."
 
Back in Trump's ancestors' day there was no welfare and all official business was conducted in English, until we get back to those conditions his statement is eminently reasonable.
 
"Trump's father/mother blah, blah, blah..."
This a stupid narrative.
"This competitive application process will favor applicants who can speak English, financially support themselves and their families and demonstrate skills that will contribute to our economy,"...

It doesn't say all non-english speakers will be automatically rejected.
 
*Trump says he wants immigrants 'who speak English' and won't 'collect welfare'

Oh no, that's so unreasonable! So cruel! Bleeding hearts will bleed... :rolleyes:
 
My grandparents were immigrants who came here legally, they learned the language and they never collected welfare even when they were destitute.
 
My grandparents were immigrants who came here legally, they learned the language and they never collected welfare even when they were destitute.
I'd guess most of us could tell a similar story.

My grandfather came over on the boat, alone, when he was 11 years old. It was up to a family member who had come earlier, to go find him and help set him up to start living here and learn english. When he was 18, he was attacked by a mob and strung up over an acid bath because he had a german name - they wanted to kill him. (Fortunately, some older worker intervened) - But until relatively recently, even legal immigrants got no free legal help, or public advocates, no food stamps, welfare, english lessons, no free apartment, no free medical care - zilch! You were on your own. No big deal - that's just the way it was.

My grandmother was even born here, but had to quit school after the 5th grade so she could help support her family.

Politicians and people who come here today, have absolutely no idea how well they are treated - and why people get pissed about paying for all their freebies after having watched their own family members take care of themselves without complaining to the government.

(and to top it off, later, the government caused a depression and then, stole their gold!)
 
Back in Trump's ancestors' day there was no welfare and all official business was conducted in English, until we get back to those conditions his statement is eminently reasonable.

Except that immigrants are more likely to be employed than natives and collect less per capita in welfare than natives...

...other than that, yes, they're the source of our problems.

And, well, ...the entire welfare-regulatory state was voted into being long before 3rd world immigration by an overwhelmingly European electorate.

...whose ancestors in Europe were responsible for 1789 and 1917 and the entire modern communist movement.

But, other than that, the beaners are clearly the problem, because...

...what kind of monster would want inexpensive tomatoes?
 
Except that immigrants are more likely to be employed than natives and collect less per capita in welfare than natives...

...other than that, yes, they're the source of our problems.

And, well, ...the entire welfare-regulatory state was voted into being long before 3rd world immigration by an overwhelmingly European electorate.

...whose ancestors in Europe were responsible for 1789 and 1917 and the entire modern communist movement.

But, other than that, the beaners are clearly the problem, because...

...what kind of monster would want inexpensive tomatoes?

Welcome back rev 3.0. In case you were curious your drivel wasn't missed. :cool:
 
Except that immigrants are more likely to be employed than natives and collect less per capita in welfare than natives...

So R3 is arguing that there is no reason reason oppose such a preference for immigrants who have the means or ability to support themselves.
 
So R3 is arguing that there is no reason reason oppose such a preference for immigrants who have the means or ability to support themselves.

R3 is arguing that there is tremendous hypocrisy hypocrisy in people getting hopped up about immigrant welfare while voting to sustain their own. The current POTUS, for instance, ran on a platform at once anti-immigrant and pro-welfare-for-Americans (protectionism, not touching SS/Medicare).
 
So R3 is arguing that there is no reason reason oppose such a preference for immigrants who have the means or ability to support themselves.
No thats not what he said at all, he looked at the root of the problem logistically. If people only oppose immigration when the economy is bad that doesn't mean there is a correlation. It's good to debate these things and look at the argument honestly. If people are against unlimited immigration when our economy is booming, then thats a different story. If you are against unlimited immigration but advocating it to fix the economy you are being dishonest. If the economy gets worse when there is an influx of cheap labor then there is something wrong with the economy and our government, don't you agree? Maybe we should debate reasons why that might be the case?
 
I agree with Zippy. Trump's requirements are totally unreasonable.:cool:

Its true. Considering USA is an English speaking nation, it is completely absurd to show a preference for immigrants that have made the effort to become proficient in English. Its so much more advantageous to not know English in an English speaking country.
For immigrants coming to the USA preference should be given to those that took the time to become proficient in Russian and Chinese. That makes so much more sense.
 
Its true. Considering USA is an English speaking nation, it is completely absurd to show a preference for immigrants that have made the effort to become proficient in English. Its so much more advantageous to not know English in an English speaking country.
For immigrants coming to the USA preference should be given to those that took the time to become proficient in Russian and Chinese. That makes so much more sense.
I don't know bringing in all of these bilingual people might be bad for American's jobs. Maybe the preference should be people that speak only English. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top