Trump Press Conference Q&A on Charlottesville

No the other side committed domestic terrorism by using violence (potentially deadly force) to try to silence the free speech of those they oppose, they just didn't think of using a car.
Yes...
You must spread some reputation around before giving it to Swordsmyth again.
 
Correct! As best as I could tell that was one person.

Are you talking to him in terms of individual people, instead of collectives?

Are you going to also talk to him in French or Russian or Muscogee, or some other languages he's incapable of comprehending?
 
If I stop laughing at you, you're going to do me a favor?

Like the next Stalinist tinpot dictator, you seem to be implying that doing you a favor is its own reward, because you just failed to offer me a single damned thing in return.

Laughing is certainly a great defense mechanism.

Correct! As best as I could tell that was one person.

One person with a poisonous ideology shared by a not-insignificant number of people that needs to be challenged and denounced at every turn. If the POTUS won't do it, anti-fascists will.
 
Last edited:
This is a common theme recently on RPF. An asshole popping out of nowhere. How many are there left?:rolleyes:
 
"Many sides" didn't commit an act of domestic terrorism by trying to mow down protesters with a vehicle.

so you haven't seen the video of bat wielding anarchists surrounding the vehicle and attacking before the vehicle accelerates forward? Go get all the facts before you speak.
 
Laughing is certainly a great defense mechanism.
It is also simply irresistible when confronted with foolishness as bizarre as yours.

So can you stand up to the same scrutiny you use against Trump?
Do YOU condemn AntiFa for stating the violence? Yes or No time punk.
 
Laughing is certainly a great defense mechanism.

Yes, it is, and I shouldn't have mentioned it. I realize Stalinists don't have senses of humor. I really shouldn't have shamed your handicap.

I don't blame you for being triggered.
 
This is a common theme recently on RPF. An $#@! popping out of nowhere. How many are there left?:rolleyes:
Whack a TR()LL?

iu
 
Unless you empathize with neo-Nazis, no one's going to call you a Nazi or a Nazi enabler. The persecution complex is just precious.
 
Unless you empathize with neo-Nazis, no one's going to call you a Nazi or a Nazi enabler. The persecution complex is just precious.
So you never heard your AntiFa friends say that all whites are racist?

By the way are you going to denounce AntiFa's starting the violence or not?

You haven't even denounced it "on many sides" yet.
 
Somebody will start a business selling not-a-nazi certificates.

Actually, they will officially be 'not a fascist' certificates. And they will only be valid if issued by a multinational corporation under contract to the government, and will lead to Antifa thugs saying, 'Your papers, please.'

Because these people clearly think it takes fascism to stop fascism.

Unless you empathize with neo-Nazis, no one's going to call you a Nazi or a Nazi enabler.

You don't seem to empathize with neo-Nazis, but you sure enable fascists. You probably don't see how. But it is what you do.

Ergo, if there's a Nazi enabler in this thread, it's you.
 
Last edited:
So you never heard your AntiFa friends say that all whites are racist?

By the way are you going to denounce AntiFa's starting the violence or not?

You haven't even denounced it "on many sides" yet.

No, I've never heard anyone I'm close to state that "all whites are racist." I wouldn't be friends with anyone who thought that. And yes, I'm against using violent means to silence anyone. I believe in counter-protesting, not in beating someone up for speaking. To add to that, I'm more closely aligned with those who would challenge fascist fucks than the fascists.
 
No, I've never heard anyone I'm close to state that "all whites are racist." I wouldn't be friends with anyone who thought that. And yes, I'm against using violent means to silence anyone. I believe in counter-protesting, not in beating someone up for speaking
But do you denounce AntiFa BY NAME? That is what you demanded of Trump about the NAZIs.
 
Unless you empathize with neo-Nazis, no one's going to call you a Nazi or a Nazi enabler. The persecution complex is just precious.

No. That's not how it works. I've already been called a neo-Nazi sympathizer on social media for saying that the Unite the Right group had a lawful permit to hold the rally and that the counter-protesters brought violence unto them to keep them from doing so.
So, you're full of bullshit.
 
But do you denounce AntiFa BY NAME? That is what you demanded of Trump about the NAZIs.

Sure, I don't agree with their tactics/methods, but I do agree with the sentiment that neo-Nazis are poison and their ideology should be summarily dismissed.

No. That's not how it works. I've already been called a neo-Nazi sympathizer on social media for saying that the Unite the Right group had a lawful permit to hold the rally and that the counter-protesters brought violence unto them to keep them from doing so.
So, you're full of bull$#@!.

If that's really how it went and there's no history of dodgy posts that would lead someone to that conclusion, I'd say you should probably not have that person on your social media account. Or at least, direct them to ACLU's stance on the matter.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top