Trump Opposition Research Thread

Trump is against endless wars. A good reason not to support him if you are heavily invested in defense stocks.

Unfortunately, no he isn't. I think you'd have to be pretty naive to believe Trump was any less likely to start a massive war than any other candidate.
 
I'm absolutely blown away by some of what I'm seeing.

Trump fascist? Sure. BUT WE'RE ALREADY LIVING IN A $#@!ING TOTALITARIAN FASCIST COUNTRY. IT'S NOT THE GODDAMN FUTURE IT'S RIGHT HERE RIGHT NOW AND ITS BEEN THAT WAY FOR DECADES GETTING WORSE AND WORSE EVERY $#@!ING YEAR!!

Don't you $#@!ing get it? This country has HAD ENOUGH of being ground to dust by globalist traitors!

We've HAD ENOUGH being thrown under the $#@!ing bus so that everyone else on this goddamn planet can come grab a piece of our sweat and blood!

This needs to end, NOW.

And if you ain't got no better ideas - and it's plain you ain't - then Trump it is.

If my choices are between the CURRENT FASCISTS who have it out for me because I'm straight, white, male, and productive and a future fascist who has it out for all the people who caused the problems in the first place, GUESS THE $#@! WHAT! I'm going to take the $#@!ing fascist who isn't aiming his fascism at me!

Ahh, a persecution complex. It all makes sense now.
 
A good first step is speaking out against the current endless wars


See 0:41



See 1:40



So far, he is the only candidate with a real shot of winning the presidency this year to do that.
30 thousand troops and bomb the shit out of them sure sounds like endless war plus starting a far east war with NK sure as hell doesn't. Just citing Trumps opposition to bush's war is useless as he only has opposition to the way Bush did it. Bush didn't seize the oil.
 
Also research should expose his ties to politicians on both sides.


As stated in elsewhere:

As this is Presidential elections season, only in "Presidential Election" section of this forum:

- his winning tactics should be studied for educational purposes
- his rebuke of likes of neocons like Lindsey Graham/McCain/"little Marco" should be cautiously praised
- his opposition to world policing, dumb blunders like Iraq war and speaking out about WMD lies should be cautiously admired
- his attacks on media should be should be cautiously envied
- his speeches without teleprompter should be debated for good and bad
- his ties to professional politicians of both sides should be exposed
- his collectivist attacks on human groups like Mexican Christians, Syrian Muslims should be exposed
- his attacks on first historic POTUS Obama, his birth certificate and alleged Islamic faith should be exposed


In short, observe, learn and only support things that can make America great/greater and demolish enemies of liberty.
 
75T2nIs.jpg
 
5:54: A flyer getting passed around by a Trump rally attendee advocates for punishment of President Barack Obama...

dt8jHDWC_bigger.jpg
Cassie Fambro Byrd Verified account ‏@CassieFambro
Getting passed around:
CXwMZHUVAAEWOY6.jpg




Highly disrespectful of current elected POTUS.
 
A better thread for it

YsBgp3A.jpg

That's actually a very interesting graphic Glen! The Trump "utopia" is an Agenda 21 style mega-city. I can't believe ppl still think he's an outsider when his bread and butter fits perfectly with the long-term Agenda 21 goals of herding everyone into mega-cities that only grow upwards.
 
:confused:

....why no 'cruz opposition thread'??...

...if trump deserves such a thread, CERTAINLY cruz, the greasy monetary ignoramus, warmonger, liar, etc.ad nauseam, deserves such a dedicated thread...
 
Despite his recent claims to the contrary (i.e. lies), Trump DID support the Iraq War

http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczy...he-supported-invading-iraq-on-the#.hkYZa7PYJ9

For months, Donald Trump has claimed that he opposed the Iraq War before the invasion began — as an example of his great judgment on foreign policy issues.

But in a 2002 interview with Howard Stern, Donald Trump said he supported an Iraq invasion.

In the interview, which took place on Sept. 11, 2002, Stern asked Trump directly if he was for invading Iraq.

“Yeah, I guess so,” Trump responded. “I wish the first time it was done correctly.”

...Trump’s comments on Stern are more in line with what he wrote in his 2000 book, The America We Deserve, where he advocated for a “principled and tough” policy toward “outlaw” states like Iraq.

“We still don’t know what Iraq is up to or whether it has the material to build nuclear weapons. I’m no warmonger,” Trump wrote. “But the fact is, if we decide a strike against Iraq is necessary, it is madness not to carry the mission to its conclusion. When we don’t, we have the worst of all worlds: Iraq remains a threat, and now has more incentive than ever to attack us.”
 
r3v writes: There's no need; no one's been promoting Cruz.


:rolleyes:

...c'mon, man!...GET REAL!!..it seems to me, THE VAST MAJORITY of the people here 'promoting trump' :rolleyes: are only 'promoting trump' over greasy-ted-the-bankster-puppet-and-stinking-warmonger-cruz...and you can pretend all you want BUT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE AT THIS SITE WHO 'PROMOTE'/(favor) THE GREASY BANKSTER PUPPET, WARMONGER, FRAUD, ETC., TED CRUZ, OVER DRUMPF IN THE ONGOING REPUBLICAN PRIMARY...btw, no big deal to me...but it's pretty obvious that the miserable piece of crap, cruz, is favored over trump here at rpf...and people who favor drumpf over cruz are singled out and given especially poor treatment..

...get real, man!.. ;)

...and btw, i'd love to start a 'sticky opposition thread' to this lying phony cruz...help me out...how do i make it 'sticky?'.. :confused:
 
Back
Top