Trump has thousands of attorneys ready for post-election legal fight

[Invisible Man]

Here's an MSM source on the state of the matter in Alaska as of 2018. It doesn't look like there was any debate about it being a fact that they had more registered voters than eligible voters at that time.
https://www.juneauempire.com/news/alaska-has-more-registered-voters-than-eligible-residents/

I think it's natural that the purging of registered voter rolls will never keep up perfectly with people dying and moving out of state. That's not to say that it isn't a problem that they should do their best with.

But it seems to me that the best way to handle this particular problem is with voter ID laws, so that the filtering out of people who live in other states or are dead would happen when they get the ID and/or use it to vote. If this is done well, then having voter rolls that don't get purged effectively enough could be moot.

 

[PRB]

Once again the judicial watch numbers were 530,385 eligible voters. The other source said only 525,568 eligible voters.

and they can both be wrong. and either way, none of that has to do with votes. Actual number of votes was 360,000 far below any of these numbers.

 

[PRB]

@PRB can't admit when he's been proven wrong.

still here, still waiting for evidence that pcosmar's claim "more votes than voters"

 

[PRB]

And your numbers make the problem more egregious.

my numbers?

 

[PRB]

But the claim that there is an overabundance of voters in any counties at all is suspect.

What the Judicial Watch data shows is that there were more registered voters in certain counties in November of 2020 using state SOS numbers than there were eligible voters in 2014-2018 using ACS numbers. In order to say that there are more registered voters than eligible voters in November of 2020, they would need to compare numbers that are all for that timeframe.

In addition to making the claim that certain counties had more registered voters than eligible voters, that same study by Judicial Watch also makes that claim about certain states, one of which is Colorado. But in the case of that claim about Colorado, they are incorrect, precisely because their outdated data source results in an underestimate of the state's current voting age population.

Granted, it's possible that they will turn out to be right in their claims about some of those counties. But in order to substantiate that claim, they would need to use accurate and up-to-date data about the voting age populations of those counties.

Since their use of outdated data can be proven to make a difference when it comes to the claim they make about the whole state of Colorado, I don't see why you're so confident that the same data source is reliable and up-to-date when used for county-level numbers.

all of which are irrelevant, because there's not a single state that there's more votes than voters. NONE.

 

[jmdrake]

still here, still waiting for evidence that pcosmar's claim "more votes than voters"

Are you ready to admit that in some states there were more registered voters than eligible voters? Because that's been proven.

 

[Invisible Man]

all of which are irrelevant, because there's not a single state that there's more votes than voters. NONE.

How does that fact make it irrelevant?

 

[TheTexan]

Trump can still win this

 

[PRB]

How does that fact make it irrelevant?

because a presidential election is an election of 50 states.

 

[PRB]

Are you ready to admit that in some states there were more registered voters than eligible voters? Because that's been proven.

No, because it's not proven.

 

[enhanced_deficit]

Trump has thousands of attorneys ready for post-election legal fight

Even if they got played by Trump's SCOTUS picks, still good pro-active visionary thinking as he may need many of them soon:

02-16-2021
Lawsuit accuses Trump of conspiring to incite Capitol riot and violate 1871 KKK Act

 

[Invisible Man]

because a presidential election is an election of 50 states.

I don't see the connection between that fact and the question of whether or not some of those states have more registered voters than eligible voters being irrelevant.

Would you agree that when a state has registered voters who are not eligible voters in that state, particularly in the cases of mail-in ballots and in states that don't have voter ID laws, this situation makes it easier for people to get away with casting fraudulent votes by falsely using the names of those registered voters who are not eligible voters who live in that state?

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

I don't see the connection between that fact and the question of whether or not some of those states have more registered voters than eligible voters being irrelevant.

Would you agree that when a state has registered voters who are not eligible voters in that state, particularly in the cases of mail-in ballots and in states that don't have voter ID laws, this situation makes it easier for people to get away with casting fraudulent votes by falsely using the names of those registered voters who are not eligible voters who live in that state?

That is the way I see it.

 

[jmdrake]

No, because it's not proven.

It absolutely has been proven. Alaska is an example. No sane and honest person would debate that after having seen the facts.

 

[acptulsa]

It absolutely has been proven. Alaska is an example. No sane and honest person would debate that after having seen the facts.

He's trying to argue that none of the ineligible voters could possibly vote until each and every single one of the eligible voters have voted.

I'm not sure how that's supposed to work...

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Trump can still win this

Trust the plan...

 

[PRB]

It absolutely has been proven. Alaska is an example. No sane and honest person would debate that after having seen the facts.

No, it hasn't. You're citing websites that were not updated.

 

[acptulsa]

No sane and honest person would debate that after having seen the facts.

No, it hasn't.

Well, Mr. Drake, when you're right you're right.

 

[jmdrake]

No, it hasn't. You're citing websites that were not updated.

Wrong again. I went to the official Alaska state government website. You have not provided a single link to support your false claims. Not one. None. Zilch. Nada. Zero.

 

[jmdrake]

I don't see the connection between that fact and the question of whether or not some of those states have more registered voters than eligible voters being irrelevant.

Would you agree that when a state has registered voters who are not eligible voters in that state, particularly in the cases of mail-in ballots and in states that don't have voter ID laws, this situation makes it easier for people to get away with casting fraudulent votes by falsely using the names of those registered voters who are not eligible voters who live in that state?

And ^that, of course, is the point. In between the insane positions of [MENTION=55014]PRB[/MENTION] and [MENTION=65299]Swordsmyth[/MENTION] is the truth. There have definitely been cases documented cases of voter fraud. The extent of the fraud has not been proven. But the potential for abuse is there. We have the case of the Democrat party chair arrested in 2015 for forging an abstentee ballot. Against that backdrop we had a massive and unprecedented increase in the number of absentee ballots coupled with changes in laws that did not allow for signature verification, it's no wonder large numbers of people are concerned about theft of the election. Proving it happened is another matter.