Trump has thousands of attorneys ready for post-election legal fight

[PRB]

You are a very dishonest Lying Troll..

How do you live with your disgusting self?

I ask you the same question.

I'm not the one who claims there's more votes than registered voters and then post an article that doesn't claim so.

 

[pcosmar]

I ask you the same question.

I'm not the one who claims there's more votes than registered voters and then post an article that doesn't claim so.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/in-the-news/1-8-mill-ghost-voters/
1.8 million illegal Votes you lying Sack Of Shit..

Dead People Voting,, Illegal Votes and Vote Fraud... Evidence has been presented..

Recount ORDERED.

 

[PRB]

https://www.judicialwatch.org/in-the-news/1-8-mill-ghost-voters/
1.8 million illegal Votes you lying Sack Of $#@!..

Dead People Voting,, Illegal Votes and Vote Fraud... Evidence has been presented..

Recount ORDERED.

that's not what the article said, you'd have copied the source where it actually said that if you had it. all you have is a misleading headline.

Judicial Watch announced today that a September 2020 study revealed that 353 U.S. counties had 1.8 million more registered voters than eligible voting-age citizens. In other words, the registration rates of those counties exceeded 100% of eligible voters. The study found eight states showing state-wide registration rates exceeding 100%: Alaska, Colorado, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

Voters and votes are not the same thing.

 

[jmdrake]

I ask you the same question.

I'm not the one who claims there's more votes than registered voters and then post an article that doesn't claim so.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/in-the-news/1-8-mill-ghost-voters/
1.8 million illegal Votes you lying Sack Of $#@!..

Dead People Voting,, Illegal Votes and Vote Fraud... Evidence has been presented..

Recount ORDERED.

Sheesh. It's not that hard to parse. There are dirty voter rolls. In a normal year that wouldn't be much of a problem because you have to show up to vote. In a mass mail in ballot year that is a problem because you don't have to show up to vote. That's why, despite the lies of the left, there is a difference between normal absentee ballots, where you have to request a ballot, and mail in voting where everyone on the rolls received a ballot whether they want one or not.

 

[PRB]

Sheesh. It's not that hard to parse. There are dirty voter rolls. In a normal year that wouldn't be much of a problem because you have to show up to vote. In a mass mail in ballot year that is a problem because you don't have to show up to vote. That's why, despite the lies of the left, there is a difference between normal absentee ballots, where you have to request a ballot, and mail in voting where everyone on the rolls received a ballot whether they want one or not.

thats still not evidence.

all you had to say was

"there are X number of ballots collected and counted, and I alleged Y number are not verified with signature."

But you're not even claiming that.

Not a single person has the balls to claim or prove that, because it didn't happen.

Let me know when you dare to put a number with evidence on here.

 

[jmdrake]

thats still not evidence.

Where did you get your law degree from again? It is evidence of potential for voter fraud. But it's not the only evidence. Here is more evidence.

https://cloverchronicle.com/2020/11...ar-1900-voting-in-2020-presidential-election/

So what you have is prove that people who are inelligible to vote are on the rolls. You also have evidence, eye witness testimony and photgraophic evidence, that in some cases votes for inelligible voters were cast. The frequency of how often that happened has yet to be deermined. Hence and investigation is warranted.

all you had to say was

"there are X number of ballots collected and counted, and I alleged Y number are not verified with signature."

After an investigation someone could say that. Not before.

 

[PRB]

So what you have is prove that people who are inelligible to vote are on the rolls.

but did they vote?

 

[pcosmar]

Where did you get your law degree from again?

Gonna be in serious funk when he looses this gig and has to try to get a real job.

 

[PRB]

Gonna be in serious funk when he looses this gig and has to try to get a real job.

no need to worry, every lie you post is helping me.

 

[jmdrake]

but did they vote?

That's being investigated. The wheels of justice turn slowly. If past history is any indication some of them did. Or rather it was done on behalf of some of them.

See: https://www.heritage.org/election-integrity/commentary/voter-fraud-database-tops-1000-proven-cases

Are you denying the history of voting fraud?

 

[Contumacious]

1. FEC guy's opinion is irrelevant to the evidence
2. there's no evidence poll watchers were refused out

THERE IS PLENTY OF WHISTLEBLOWER AND AFFIANTS TESTIMONY SHOWING THAT POLL WATCHERS WERE REFUSED OUT.

YOU MAY NOT LIKE IT BUT IS EVIDENCE NEVERTHELESS UNTIL OVERRULED BY THE JUDICARY.

 

[PRB]

THERE IS PLENTY OF WHISTLEBLOWER AND AFFIANTS TESTIMONY SHOWING THAT POLL WATCHERS WERE REFUSED OUT.

YOU MAY NOT LIKE IT BUT IS EVIDENCE NEVERTHELESS UNTIL OVERRULED BY THE JUDICARY.

there was a capacity to how many poll watchers were allowed, but Michigan, where it was alleged, there was plenty of people in both parties allowed.

 

[PRB]

That's being investigated. T

LAME.

Let me know when you can give me a number.

 

[PRB]

Are you denying the history of voting fraud?

No, I'm denying that this year has enough fraud to matter and the claims currently presented. Especially in light of liars like you who can't even tell the difference between voters and votes.

 

[pcosmar]

there was a capacity to how many poll watchers were allowed, but Michigan, where it was alleged, there was plenty of people in both parties allowed.

LIE

 

[PRB]

LIE

Why should I care an idiot like you who can't even read calls me a liar?

You literally claimed "there are more votes than registered voters"
When asked for proof you posted 2 links which were essentially the same claim, which is "more registered voters than eligible voters" which is not the same as votes.

You claim 1.8M votes exceeded registered voters or illegal counted, not a single shred of evidence.

 

[Contumacious]

there was a capacity to how many poll watchers were allowed, but Michigan, where it was alleged, there was plenty of people in both parties allowed.

And you have personal knowledge how?

And if you have personal knowledge have you submitted the evidence to the court?

 

[jmdrake]

No, I'm denying that this year has enough fraud to matter and the claims currently presented. Especially in light of liars like you who can't even tell the difference between voters and votes.

Now you're just stepping in it junior. Once again it has been proven that in some counties there were more registered voters than eligible voters. That means the situation is ripe for voter fraud which means that an investigation is warranted. But keep making up lies and calling other people liars.

 

[PRB]

Now you're just stepping in it junior. Once again it has been proven that in some counties there were more registered voters than eligible voters. That means the situation is ripe for voter fraud which means that an investigation is warranted. But keep making up lies and calling other people liars.

"Once again it has been proven that in some counties there were more registered voters than eligible voters."

No, it hasn't. Never has.

 

[Aratus]

The GOP saw this mess coming a year ago:



more:
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/27/trump-legal-network-election-day-fight-422035

in the very beginning of this thread, the OP had an article about DJT's access to legal eagle talent...