Trump has thousands of attorneys ready for post-election legal fight

[PRB]

@PRB Should the 2020 Election be the goal or standard that all elections should be judged by?

Yes.

If you were Trump, would you be convinced that the election was fair?

If I was Trump, I'd be a liar, psychopath and misogynist, so, what I believe about the election is probably the least of your worries. I know what he believes, doesn't mean he's right.

Did you see Trumps list of what he thinks should take place for future elections?

No, nor do I care to, because he's a liar and narcissist.

President Trump listed the activities needed to address the election fraud of 2020.

President Trump listed the activities needed in elections going forward in his speech today at CPAC:

1. We should have one election day
2. The only people that should be allowed to vote absentee are those with a good reason
3. Eliminate mail-in voting
4. Must have voter ID
5. We need universal signature matching
6. There should be 100% requirement to be American to vote
7. Must have chain of custody for every ballot.

I agree with 6 & 7, the rest are intentionally designed to reduce voter turnout for no good reason.

Universal signature matching would effectively mean federal signature control, which completely undermines states rights as well as personal privacy. (If it means something else, I am open to hearing it, I am 100% for signature verification, but I don't think new laws are needed)

 

[PRB]

I guess the same thing could be said about the way he includes "100%" in point #6.

As if that's not already the case, his dishonesty is why nobody takes him seriously anymore.

 

[TheTexan]

Yes, it makes perfect sense, because one is easier to catch and prove, and Trump zealots have people of varying risk tolerances, obviously 99% of them stayed home and did nothing but vote.

Also, they probably tried to go through lawyers and any competent lawyer would advise them not to commit perjury.

It sounds to me like you're jumping through logical hoops to defend an indefensible position.

Which means you have a mental illness, and I will be engaging no further.

Have fun annoying the other people on this forum =)

 

[TheTexan]

//

 

[PRB]

It sounds to me like you're jumping through logical hoops to defend an indefensible position.

Nope, simple facts : nobody has filed a lawsuit for the 2020 election claiming under oath that their vote was stolen or somebody else voted on their behalf.

 

[TheTexan]

Nope, simple facts : nobody has filed a lawsuit for the 2020 election claiming under oath that their vote was stolen or somebody else voted on their behalf.

Ya, you don't seem to understand how court proceedings even work. You don't file lawsuits "under oath"

 

[tebowlives]

not what you said. try again, read what you said this time.

You wanted a citation I gave you one. try again and clarify what you need this time

But if it's because you don't understand what I posted maybe I can help. May means if it isn't verifiable then it isn't counted. More mail ins than ever before means human verifying standards change. Not necessarily the rules.

 

[pcosmar]

As if that's not already the case, his dishonesty is why nobody takes him seriously anymore.

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/...j6HIubYZ0EbEF1jmahX4W9qZ4pI25irX3ghRnDp-BsWQs

 

[PRB]

Ya, you don't seem to understand how court proceedings even work. You don't file lawsuits "under oath"

Your filings will have to include in writing, that you presented the facts to the best of your knowledge and you are under penalty of perjury.

But anyway, nobody filed one, with or without sworn affidavits, NONE, NOT A SINGLE ONE.

 

[PRB]

You wanted a citation I gave you one.

"In Wisconsin 10000 ballots only had the name on it. In the past those were invalidated."

Do you have any proof that 10,000 only had a name and were counted?

 

[PRB]

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/...j6HIubYZ0EbEF1jmahX4W9qZ4pI25irX3ghRnDp-BsWQs

"The study found that 352 U.S. counties in 29 states managed to have 1.8 million more registered voters than eligible voting-age citizens."

The study is a joke, and still doesn't prove there's more votes than voters.

 

[pcosmar]

Oh,,and also FRAUD

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...50-counts-of-voter-fraud-in-texas/ar-BB1e7wQ0
https://dfw.cbslocal.com/2020/11/06/texas-social-worker-charged-counts-election-fraud/

For those that say it ain't so,,
just a couple quick finds.

 

[PRB]

Oh,,and also FRAUD

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...50-counts-of-voter-fraud-in-texas/ar-BB1e7wQ0
https://dfw.cbslocal.com/2020/11/06/texas-social-worker-charged-counts-election-fraud/

For those that say it ain't so,,
just a couple quick finds.

still not "more votes than voters"

How many times are you going to keep posting things that have nothing to do with your debunked claim?

 

[pcosmar]

still not "more votes than voters"

How many times are you going to keep posting things that have nothing to do with your debunked claim?

How long are you going to pretend there was anything legitimate about the entire selection?

I did not vote for Trump.. and certainly not for the doddering mindless pervert in Chief.

just Observing.

 

[phill4paul]

STILL talking about Trump? LOLOL.

Umm, Biden's the president select. MOAR on his bullshit please.

 

[PRB]

How long are you going to pretend there was anything legitimate about the entire selection?

I did not vote for Trump.. and certainly not for the doddering mindless pervert in Chief.

just Observing.

I don't need to pretend, I admit there's small instances of fraud or illegal votes, but not nearly enough to change the outcome of the election, nor do any claims of vote switching, machine tampering, dead people voting, illegal aliens voting, add up to anything substantial.

 

[pcosmar]

I don't need to pretend, I admit there's small instances of fraud or illegal votes, but not nearly enough to change the outcome of the election, nor do any claims of vote switching, machine tampering, dead people voting, illegal aliens voting, add up to anything substantial.

Your Pedo Won,,so it's OK..

Gotcha

 

[tebowlives]

"In Wisconsin 10000 ballots only had the name on it. In the past those were invalidated."

Do you have any proof that 10,000 only had a name and were counted?

The claim is that the witness signature on mail in ballots were not verified. The sheer volume saw to that. It wasn't about fraud, it was the lack of oversight.

 

[TheTexan]

Your filings will have to include in writing, that you presented the facts to the best of your knowledge and you are under penalty of perjury.

But anyway, nobody filed one, with or without sworn affidavits, NONE, NOT A SINGLE ONE.

Not a single one? I would disprove that but I simply don't care.

 

[PRB]

Not a single one? I would disprove that but I simply don't care.

I dare you