Trump election panel asks all 50 states for voter roll data

Nullification of laws against voter fraud would constitute declaring a non-republican form of government, the offending state should then be expelled from the union, or Federal intervention would be appropriate upon application for redress of grievances by the citizens of the offending state.

We don't have a republic now- that was destroyed by the War Between the States and completely buried by 1913.
 
I'd like to ask Count if he's thinks the states have the right to secede, but I don't have the energy to ask 3 times and then decipher the answers.


Too bad that schlep is stuck in South Carolina. He referred to it as the Anus of the Carolinas. He hates S Carolina more than he hates liberty.
 
I'd like to ask Count if he's thinks the states have the right to secede, but I don't have the energy to ask 3 times and then decipher the answers.
I don't think governments have rights.


If you're asking if states should be able to secede, then yes, I do think that they should be able to.
 
Setting aside the details of Dump's request and just dealing with the philosophy, the Constitution states that the Federal government is to: guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government
Voter fraud destroys a "republican form of government"
Federal investigation of voter fraud is therefore Constitutional, the details may not be.

Indeed, and anyone can walk into an election commission and ask for the records. It's public record.
 
Indeed, and anyone can walk into an election commission and ask for the records. It's public record.

Yeah, I'm not sure this is a big deal anyway. Even if they pull your voting record, what does it tell them? They don't know who you voted for and that's seems to me to be the most important thing.
 
....but I'm not sure why he [TheCount] can't just say "yes".

I am sure why. It's why he skirts around all such issues.


ObfuscateLarge.jpg
 
He put "..." followed by a sentence that says he supports secession. I'm assuming that means he supported the south's right to secede but I'm not sure why he can't just say "yes".

This looks pretty plain to me:
[MENTION=58229]TheCount[/MENTION]:
If you're asking if states should be able to secede, then yes, I do think that they should be able to.
 
He is saying "The Great and Mighty COUNT would deign to let them but they do not have the Right".

NO.
[MENTION=58229]TheCount[/MENTION] said:

I don't think governments have rights.

And he is correct.

THEN he said:

If you're asking if states should be able to secede, then yes, I do think that they should be able to.

Also, correct- the original plan of the united States.
 
Maybe we could re-ask the same question ten different ways and try to do some Alex Jones-level analysis on why it doesn't mean what it says.
 
For most everyone I'd agree, but since TheCount has a well deserved reputation as a liberal democrat, I wanted to make sure.

Only from those who don't understand sarcasm.

Most of [MENTION=58229]TheCount[/MENTION]'s dialog is sarcastic- only lately with all the Trump carp and name-calling has he been a bit more straight forward.

He is NOT a liberal democrat- just more nonsense from people who jump to conclusions. It would certainly be great to move ahead in the forum dialog instead of pouncing on certain members and adding pages and pages of personal insults; if you don't like someone, ignore them.
 
Back
Top