Trump did not visit Epstein homes or island, no contact with underage girls

[dannno]

Why would Trump inform on Epstein to the FBI back in 2004 if he was complicit?

This was all extremely obvious from the start...

 

[Cap]

It's pretty self evident who the usurpers of liberty are.

Bears repeating

 

[ClaytonB]

Why would Trump inform on Epstein to the FBI back in 2004 if he was complicit?

This was all extremely obvious from the start...

No, no, mindlessly repeating Democrat talking-points in respect to Trump's involvement with Epstein is the way to go, here. See, we don't care about how many times Clinton or Gates flew the Lolita to Little St. James, or what was going on down there, because we can't split the conservative vote with those "irrelevant" facts. But dragging votes away from MAGA (née Tea-Party) by litmus-testing Trump against libertarian ideological purity is obviously the way to go for the great success of this country!

You know, if the never-Trumper libertarians had some kind of alternative to Trump that could build some real populist momentum, an "American Javier Milei", so to speak, I would drop Trump like a hot-potato without a second thought. It's the fact that they have no alternative, that there's nothing in particular that they can point us towards, in terms of a political focal-point for MAGA/conservative/libertarian political energy, that gives away the real game, here. The game is called "2-party split-the-vote". Blindly repeating leftist talking-points because you're too committed to ideological purity and litmus-testing to see the political consequences 3 steps down the road...

 

[Cap]

Ah, just build them a new FBI building.

 

[acptulsa]

I think I can count on one hand the number of times I've used the TDS label here.

Gee, I didn't know you were a mutant. How do you carry those paws around?

Don't start comparing crosses, that's a game for fools only and I won't participate, for your own good.

It is a game for fools. Case in point:

See, we don't care about how many times Clinton or Gates flew the Lolita to Little St. James, or what was going on down there, because we can't split the conservative vote with those "irrelevant" facts. But dragging votes away from MAGA (née Tea-Party) by litmus-testing Trump against libertarian ideological purity is obviously the way to go for the great success of this country!

So you'll support evil, and tell yourself lies about evil, because the fake news won't talk about someone else's evil. And you think supporting the lesser evil leads to "great success" even though so far, it has led us here.

Too slick for words.

And yes. Your memes do suck. If you don't believe it, you have SMDS. Which is an acronym I like using, just do you'll know.

 

[dannno]

Ah, just build them a new FBI building.

How about a Boxabl?

 

[ClaytonB]

So you'll support evil, and tell yourself lies about evil, because the fake news won't talk about someone else's evil. And you think supporting the lesser evil leads to "great success" even though so far, it has led us here.

I left the R party and never looked back after Dubya due to rejection of the "lesser of two evils"-calculus. That was almost 20 years ago. The Republican Party are a bunch of pants-on-fire liars, and they are lackeys of the very same globalist Cabal that the Democrats are openly bootlicking for. The only difference is that the Democrats are honest about it, and the Republican Party are a bunch of pants-on-fire liars. They use the "only one of us can win, so you can never have a 3rd-party-candidate"-trick to split the vote in any movement that would be a real challenge to the 2-party monolith. Are you jotting these review notes down? Because there will be a pop quiz later. Anyway, what was the populist conservative response to the 2-party oligopoly on Federal-level elections? That's right, the Tea Party. The Tea Party was a populist uprising that overlapped with the Republican Party and carried with it the real threat of hijacking party control from the RINO neoCONs, from within. Bush and the neoCONs used 9/11 to tamp down Tea Party energy and channel it into bombing brown-skinned people in far away places, and that kept the chimps quiet for a while. Then, he cooperated with the Deep State to ensure an "orderly transition of power" that "protected democracy" from himself to a Kenyan-born remote-control puppet of the CIA. This was like dumping rocket fuel on the still white-hot embers of the Tea Party and, by 2015/2016, exploded into the Tea-Party successor we all know as MAGA. Trump emerged at the head of MAGA but the only thing that Trump can really take credit for in all of this, was having the wherewithal to see the Big Curl coming up from the deep, getting on his surfboard, and surfing that baby to POTUS when almost none of the political commentators out there, left or right, believed he could pull it off. I hope you're taking notes, because I know this is complicated stuff, so try to keep up. So, here's the magic-formula: MAGA=Tea-Party=rejection of the 2-party oligopoly at the Federal level. Whether you like Trump or not, he is the head that emerged at the right time, at the right place. And contrary to my own expectations, Trump did in fact snub his nose at the neoCON/RINO Establishment and pressed Pause on the Military Industrial Complex for four years, a disruption to the incessant left-right march of the globalists which they're still stumbling around trying to recover from to this day. Does Trump get credit for that, or MAGA? Frankly, I don't care. No new wars were started. Less bombs were dropped. Less missile strikes. Less aggressive carrier-group confrontations with our trading-partners. And so on. The MIC/neoCONs were left out in the Antarctic blast stark naked for four years. They're still deep blue to this day.

 

[ClaytonB]

Ah, just build them a new FBI building.

What building? I don't see any new FBI building. Do you think Trump can't lie to a notorious group of proven liars? Not only proven, they themselves openly admit that they will lie, and even offer classes on the art of lying for political and other purposes. If this is the level of political analysis that the libertarian-sphere is running on, no wonder we keep getting obliterated in the polls...

 

[ClaytonB]

Gee, I didn't know you were a mutant. How do you carry those paws around?



It is a game for fools. Case in point:



So you'll support evil, and tell yourself lies about evil, because the fake news won't talk about someone else's evil. And you think supporting the lesser evil leads to "great success" even though so far, it has led us here.

Too slick for words.

And yes. Your memes do suck. If you don't believe it, you have SMDS. Which is an acronym I like using, just do you'll know.

Yeah, OK, thanks for the spam "history lesson", we all get the point that you know how the forum-search feature works...

 

[acptulsa]

It's interesting reading. And it beats carrying around a complete misunderstanding of what really went down.

Unless you don't want to understand. I did take time to only select what's relevant to your numerous misconceptions.

You could give it a try.

 

[ClaytonB]

It's interesting reading. And it beats carrying around a complete misunderstanding of what really went down.

Unless you don't want to understand. I did take time to only select what's relevant to your numerous misconceptions.

You could give it a try.

I understand quite well what is actually at stake, much better than can be learned from reading random reaction-threads on RPF. It's a nice record of how people felt in the moment, thanks for sharing. Also, check my join date on my profile. I was here. And before, too, I can't remember the username of my original account but it's from I think 2008 or 2009 IIRC. I've been here longer than you think...

 

[vita3]

I'm gonna vote for whomever can create a new branch of the military!

 

[acptulsa]

I can't remember the username of my original account but it's from I think 2008 or 2009 IIRC. I've been here longer than you think...

Just as long as it wasn't Sola_Fide.

I'm gonna vote for whomever can create a new branch of the military!

I'm surrounded. This is worse than when I was in a high school with orange as a school color.

 

[Occam's Banana]

It's interesting reading. And it beats carrying around a complete misunderstanding of what really went down.

Unless you don't want to understand. I did take time to only select what's relevant to your numerous misconceptions.

You could give it a try.

Please do not do that again - it was excessive and entirely unnecessary.

Instead of necro-bumping 25 threads (and thereby forcing everyone else - many of whom would have no idea what the purpose was - to wade through an entire page-worth of entries in their "New Posts" feed), you could have made the same point (and avoided spamming ClaytonB's "mentions" notifications) by simply including links to all those threads in a single post to this thread,

I have deleted all the necro-bumps.

 

[acptulsa]

... by simply including links to all those threads in a single post to this thread,

I have deleted all the necro-bumps.

That would have been a better idea. Wish I had thought of it. I would have done it, too, if asked to before I lost track of those links somehow...

 

[Swordsmyth]

[/COLOR]There are two types here - one that remembers one or two of the principles this site was created on, and Trump voters.

That's one type.
Type #2 are people who love virtue signalling and making the perfect the enemy of the good more than any principles of liberty so much that they will fall for any con job rather than admit that Trump did a lot of good.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Did he or didn't he sample the fresh whores d'oeuvres on Epstein's jet? Lord, save us from the distraction of the minutiae and teach us how to stand up against humans being used as guinea pigs.

He didn't.
The jet he caught a ride home on was not the Lolita express.

 

[acptulsa]

He didn't.
The jet he caught a ride home on was not the Lolita express.

Uh huh. Lolita Express was only Lolita Express when going to and from the island, and Air Force One is only Air Force One when the president's on board.

They didn't change the hors d'oeuvres on either one, though. And you have no way whatsoever of knowing what he ate and what ate him on that flight. Nothing but blind faith.

 

[CCTelander]

Uh huh. Lolita Express was only Lolita Express when going to and from the island, and Air Force One is only Air Force One when the president's on board.

They didn't change the hors d'oeuvres on either one, though. And you have no way whatsoever of knowing what he ate and what ate him on that flight. Nothing but blind faith.

Isn’t blind faith what one typically has in one’s idolatrous “god”?

 

[TheCount]

Nice try. Swing and a miss.

From you:

"Trump and his fellators are the outraged ones who claim that he's unfairly disadvantaged by an unfair justice system which is biased against him. "

Have you made a new years resolution to post this way on purpose or is it a coincidence?

Also, it occurs to me that it's almost like there's some sort of two-tiered justice system where people how have wealth and power aren't held to account the way the rest of us are.


And for the oblivious in the room (you know who you are), no, Donald fucking Trump is not somehow in the disadvantaged tier. He's spent most of his life doing things that would put any of us in a jail or a poorhouse.