Trump Changing His Position on Immigration

And more context, the people interviewing Trump were pushing the "best and brightest" canard. Trump was responding in a positive way to their US Chamber of Commerce / High Tech Crony Corporatist talking point view of immigration.

The right wing of the uniparty works just as hard as the left wing on continuing massive immigration. They don't want any solutions. To them, massive immigration is a good thing. Next best thing to buying slaves.
 
Trump included all college degrees, regardless of type.

The example Massie gave was one example of a degree that would meet Trump's criteria.

Hey dumbo, the word Degree was never used/uttered in the interview, so again you are lieing about what was said. He is being interviewed by Tech executives. He is talking directly to them about the highly technical skilled workers that these firms are looking for. The context matters. You can't fabricate anything you want and say that's what Trump believes.
 
Last edited:
Hey dumbo, the word Degree was never used/uttered in the interview, so again you are lieing about what was said.

If you're going to commit a forum rules violation over it, you could at least listen again and make sure Trump not only didn't say "degree" --twice--but that he did not also say "diploma" (something which confers and confirms a guess what when awarded by a college or university).

You're not only lying about that, you're lying about how the word lying is spelled. I guess we just don't find this inaccurate from of "enlightenment" enlightening.
 
Last edited:
Trump included all college degrees, regardless of type.
.

Trump used the word “diploma” instead of “degree.” And he referred to graduating from either college or junior college in either 4 or 2 years. I haven’t scoured the video to catch if he used the word “degree” at any point or not. But it sounds like you have, so I’ll take your word for it.

At any rate a college diploma and a degree are the same thing. Graduating from college is the same as getting a degree.

What Massie said was a completely accurate representation of what Trump said.

The more I read your first comment in this thread the funnier it gets. It’s a video of Trump speaking, saying what he meant to say in his own words. He will change his position tomorrow. But in the words he used in that video in the OP, he articulated the position he articulated. To call that fake news and accuse Trump of misrepresenting his own position is hilarious.
 
And more context, the people interviewing Trump were pushing the "best and brightest" canard. Trump was responding in a positive way to their US Chamber of Commerce / High Tech Crony Corporatist talking point view of immigration.

The right wing of the uniparty works just as hard as the left wing on continuing massive immigration. They don't want any solutions. To them, massive immigration is a good thing. Next best thing to buying slaves.


Remember that moment GW Bush when he also said that he would be agaisnt nation building and then the two wars in the middle east were started by the Bush admin?
 
And more context, the people interviewing Trump were pushing the "best and brightest" canard. Trump was responding in a positive way to their US Chamber of Commerce / High Tech Crony Corporatist talking point view of immigration.

The right wing of the uniparty works just as hard as the left wing on continuing massive immigration. They don't want any solutions. To them, massive immigration is a good thing. Next best thing to buying slaves.

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Brian4Liberty again.
 
Then there folks like [MENTION=3169]Anti Federalist[/MENTION] and [MENTION=65299]Swordsmyth[/MENTION] who will be on stand-by to shoot-to-kill on site.
[MENTION=40029]PAF[/MENTION]

Minefields.

They are cheaper than soldiers, won't hesitate to act, are on guard 24/7 and do a hell of a job deterring invaders.
 
[MENTION=40029]PAF[/MENTION]

Minefields.

They are cheaper than soldiers, won't hesitate to act, are on guard 24/7 and do a hell of a job deterring invaders.


That's the Globalist Agenda of which you support. Spend spend spend into oblivion and reduce the carbon footprint.

The remaining survivors will of course service their masters in the 4th Industrial Revolution, even though you think you won.
 
Then why do globalists, universally, support migrant invasion of the West?

I don't believe they care either way where people actually live. But they do use it as a politicized tool, which enrages voters on both sides to literally beg for government "solutions", and drains tax-payers on both sides of their money.
 
I don't believe they care either way where people actually live. But they do use it as a politicized tool, which enrages voters on both sides to literally beg for government "solutions", and drains tax-payers on both sides of their money.

So if the globalists didn't care, then wouldn't they fall out roughly 50/50 pro and con?

C'mon, you can say it...it's OK.

Globalists are universally in favor of, promote vigorously, support financially (where do you think all those NGOs are getting their funding from outside the US?), and use as a tool to collapse nations, the unhindered and unimpeded invasion of foreigners into a targeted nation.

There is no question about this, they brag about it in speeches and books and opinion pages all around the world.

You can call me whatever you like, but you can not accurately call me a supporter of the globalist agenda for opposing the invasion.

Not and be honest about it anyway.
 
So if the globalists didn't care, then wouldn't they fall out roughly 50/50 pro and con?

C'mon, you can say it...it's OK.

Globalists are universally in favor of, promote vigorously, support financially (where do you think all those NGOs are getting their funding from outside the US?), and use as a tool to collapse nations, the unhindered and unimpeded invasion of foreigners into a targeted nation.

There is no question about this, they brag about it in speeches and books and opinion pages all around the world.

You can call me whatever you like, but you can not accurately call me a supporter of the globalist agenda for opposing the invasion.

Not and be honest about it anyway.

I don't put blame on Globalists or Crony-corporatists. I put blame square on the people who contribute and allow it to happen. Who am I to argue whether people want a Constitution-Free Zone lined with military, nationwide Stop and Frisk, free government issued cards and places to stay, whether in a luxurious hotel or a MIC for profit Holding Cell.

The only way this nation will collapse is to drain us completely broke, while stripping ourselves of the Bill of Rights, the very thing the border is supposed to signify. And that is what the Globalists want - for us to do it to ourselves.
 
This is ridiculous fake news and you should delete your post. Trump has always been for merit based immigration, he's talking about students that come to our country legally on student visas to go to school here. Of course Congress would have input and there would be degree restrictions, the fact that the interview didn't expand on that and for massie to assume Trump wants 2yr poli sci majors getting green cards is totally imaginary BS.

Some idiot like Ramaswampy fed him this idea and he tried out how it sounded.
It's not going to happen.
 
For the same reason PAF supports it.

He's not the one supporting a guy who signed off on budgets which paid NGOs to import them. You are.

And no, budgets aren't immune to being vetoed. Nothing that comes out of Congress is immune to being vetoed but meaningless "resolutions".
 
Last edited:
He's not the one supporting a guy who signed off on budgets which paid NGOs to import them. You are.

And no, budgets aren't immune to being vetoed. Nothing that comes out of Congress is immune to being vetoed but meaningless "resolutions".

Yes, uniparty priorities that pass with supermajorities are veto proof and a waste of political capitol to virtue signal about.
 
This is how Massie gets on peoples $#@! list and never accomplishes anything. He could have said 'I agree with Trump. But I would advocate for degree restrictions, WE don't want 2yr political science majors that don't help our country automatically getting green cards". Instead, he immediately drama farms on X and lies and makes $#@! up that Trump didn't say.

Is Trump your god? Serious question. Why are you judging Massie on how much he goes out of his way to kiss Trump's arse?

As far as 2 year degrees verses something else, most people who get 2 year degrees are nurses or plumbers or accountants. I guess it's possible to get a 2 year degree in political science but I've never heard of someone actually doing that. There is a nursing shortage in this country. A 2 year nursing degree is more helpful to the country than a political science PhD.

The other issue is that I know for a fact that some here, including [MENTION=1874]Brian4Liberty[/MENTION], have been against expanding H1B visas. Those go to people with masters degrees in engineering and computer science. Back in the 1990s when I was in the comp sci graduate program at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, the overwhelming majority of the students in the department were foreign born, mostly India and China. Whether you think H1B visas are good or bad, Trump had been publicly saying he was against expanding them. But this is a stealth expansion. It's a flip flop.
 
[MENTION=40029]PAF[/MENTION]

Minefields.

They are cheaper than soldiers, won't hesitate to act, are on guard 24/7 and do a hell of a job deterring invaders.

So then when America gets so fvcked that maybe some of us want to leave we've got a minefield to deal with? Sounds like the Berlin wall. No thanks.

Edit: And guess where I got this idea from?





Sorry but [MENTION=40029]PAF[/MENTION] is more right than wrong on this one.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top