- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 62,151
Last edited:
... and for massie to assume Trump wants 2yr poli sci majors getting green cards is totally imaginary BS.
This is how Massie gets on peoples $#@! list and never accomplishes anything.
Me, I would just let them earn a buck, spend money on stuff to support businesses, and not think twice if their wages weren't taxed at all. But, that idea isn't too popular here in 'Merika.
Trump has always been for merit based immigration
You'd also let them find their own way here and sink or swim, instead of having their fare, room and board paid by taxpayers.
Republicans keep forgetting that these things are even things. Yes, your government did these things, and Trump doesn't sound like he'll do any more to stop it than he did last time. More recruiters to bring them just means more cops are needed to stop and frisk them -- and us -- after they arrive. Suits Trump.
and for massie to assume Trump wants 2yr poli sci majors getting green cards is totally imaginary BS.
Massie is simply accurately restating exactly what Trump says he's for in the video posted in the OP.
Massie is simply accurately restating exactly what Trump says he's for in the video posted in the OP.
This is ridiculous fake news and you should delete your post. Trump has always been for merit based immigration, he's talking about students that come to our country legally on student visas to go to school here. ...
Wrong, types of degrees were never brought up in the video, so it's wrong to imagine Trump supports something he didn't say. Trump was clear he wants highly skilled students that create businesses and jobs that benefit our country to be eligible.
Granted, Trump has had that position, just like every politician says that they support "legal" immigration. Going against the US Chamber of Commerce is like going against AIPAC.
The change in this interview was Trump emphasizing that 2 year degrees would qualify.
And my problem with the entire concept is that these politicians look at someone like Elon Musk and say "it would be tragic not to give someone like this a green card and eventual citizenship". The problem being that people like that are rare. They are an exception, not the rule. Making gross generalizations and thus policy based upon the top 1% is foolish.