Yeah, it's going to be interesting to see what these orange d1ck-polishers will come up with in response.
"I don't understand why these Trump supporters won't agree with me."
Yeah, it's going to be interesting to see what these orange d1ck-polishers will come up with in response.
Objectively speaking, I don't think a cost-benefit analysis would bear that out.
You are far more likely to die in a car accident on your way to and from your polling place than you are to have your vote make a difference, and given that the difference in outcome offers so little benefit for one candidate versus another, sitting at home is probably the better option.
The choice is between a candidate whose base is mostly friendly to a lot of libertarian ideas or a candidate whose base wants you dead. It's hard not to see the difference.
The choice is between a candidate whose base is mostly friendly to a lot of libertarian ideas or a candidate whose base wants you dead. It's hard not to see the difference.
The choice is between a candidate whose base is mostly friendly to a lot of libertarian ideas or a candidate whose base wants you dead. It's hard not to see the difference.
Don't bring facts into the two minutes of hate.
“To vote for a person who ran up $8+ Trillion in debt, started a brand new federal agency OWS, called Massie a third-rate grandstander because he wanted congress to vote on the record, makes absolutely no sense at all.”
It’s much worse. He tweeted Massie should be kicked out of Republican Party, because he just wanted standard Congressional accountability
Don't expect critical thinking from the sexually obsessed TDS crowd.
The choice is between a candidate whose base is mostly friendly to a lot of libertarian ideas or a candidate whose base wants you dead. It's hard not to see the difference.
the choice between an autocratic party whose primaries are crooked and a party where a guy like Trump can get nominated.
Somebody wasn't inMiamiTampa in '12.
I think Trump was better on foreign policy, And that's no small thing. On the other hand, he gave us the COVID lockdowns and associated spending, and that's no small thing either.
2a + y + 3 = 6x + y + 8
[...]
(That was my first attempt to explain how to measure candidates using mathematics. I apologize, and it won't happen again. Also please don't try to solve that equation because I'm not sure it's solvable, and I'm very rusty on high-school algebra)
It's like algebraic equations. You just take out the common variables on both sides and what you're left with is the difference.
"Both." Not "all", just "both".
In 1860 the nation was staring civil war in the face, and told the Whig Party to go to hell. Guess the population had more on the ball back then. The people weren't all, like, oh, we don't have permission to vote for that third Republican Party.
We are $#@!ed. Bend down and kiss what little is left of this nation goodbye.
I mean, once the Republican party supplanted the Whig party as one of the two major parties (and the Whig party just, imploded), it was still 'both' and has remained so until this day. Apparently, the American people will never allow themselves to have a densely populated field of parties to choose from.
Okay.
So why were they allowed to replace one if it got too crappy, and why aren't we?
Do you think it's easier to reach that point with or without Trump?