Trump admin prepares charges to seek arrest of WikiLeaks' Julian Assange

[Dark_Horse_Rider]

I'm with Dannno here.

What Dannno seems to be saying is "hey, you're saying that CNN isn't full of sht about this Assange thing, well, CNN said there would be 350K troops on the ground. Where is it?"

And what I'm seeing is a whole bunch of people completely missing Dannno's point, which is CNN is full of sht.

Don't you realize that CNN is full of sht? Did you not experience the Ron Paul campaigns?

It just seems that somehow, liberal democrats have taken hold of ronpaulforums and are spewing BS.

The last President to get shot was Reagan, and I was a little kid at the time, many would agree that Reagan wasn't the same after getting shot. The shooter, John Hinckley Jr, was a Bush family friend, or his dad was a big Bush contributor and his brother, Scott, had to cancel dinner plans with Neil Bush. Bush, before VP, was head of the CIA. This is relevant stuff when questioning whether Trump really is going to be able to get what he wants if the CIA doesn't want to do that.

It seems that if you don't do what the CIA wants (or the deep state wants), the CIA or someone on Team Bush might just shoot you. And it seems like all the spying isn't being done to stop terrorism, but to gather dirt against politicians to blackmail them to do what the spies want. Back in 2008, 2012, we all knew this and didn't like it. Since then, there has been more and more proof that what we all knew but didn't have too much evidence is definitely taking place.

Dannno lives within the context of the reality timeline for a Ron Paul supporter. So many here seem to live on this alternate universe timeline where there is no CIA, no deep state, none of that stuff that Ron Paul talked so much about in the campaigns of 2008 and 2012. He was against all that then and he's still against all that now, and so many here seem to be on the side of CNN and the CIA.

yeah that

 

[liveandletlive]

this dude is Hillary without the cankles

 

[TheCount]

Oh, ok, let me know when we have 350k boots on the ground in Syria then

If we did, you'd say that at least it's not 500K.

 

[PAF]

 

[donnay]

So which is it--I am so confused. CNN tells everyone the Trump Administration is going to arrest Assange and yet just in March the Media was writing how in-love Trump is with Wikileaks.

March Headlines:

WikiLeaks Has Joined the Trump Administration
http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/03/08/wikileaks-has-joined-the-trump-administration/

Trump ally Farage visits embassy where Julian Assange lives
http://thehill.com/policy/internati...ecuadorian-embassy-where-wikileaks-founder-is

 

[CPUd]

 

[r3volution 3.0]

That's right. Here's everyone saying, Teh Trump is doing everything the Deep State says, and when they say Jump he only asks, how high? Why do they sound like Democrats, because of course Democrats complain about the Deep State all the time? Don't you know that CNN lies all the time, except when CNN said the Deep State gave a damn whether Teh Trump or Clinton won, like they weren't identical, because they had to have been telling the truth then even though they never tell the truth ever?

Of course when the media allegedly lied about Trump during the campaign, he always used Twit-er to tell us the truth, and all we've seen on his Twits lately is NATO is good, and Yellin is good, and China isn't a currency manipulator, and that's okay too. Because the CIA will kill him. Never mind that the excuse we all gave for leaving Rand Paul in the dust and chasing after Teh Trump (besides the fact that CNN told us and told us and told us they didn't like Trump, and didn't mention Rand Paul even once) was Teh Trump had the balls to talk like a third grade bully, and Rand Paul told us what was really going on in a rational manner. Never mind that we all saw third grade bullies who were all talk and, when push came to shove, ran like rabbits. Never mind that Rand Paul proved he has balls by standing up in the Senate and pushing back against the Deep State, time and time again, just like his father. Teh Trump talked tough, like he had balls so of course we had to take a chance and elect him, and see if he had balls, because we knew Rand Paul had balls but he didn't talk like a third grade bully, and CNN which always lies except when it says it doesn't like Teh Trump told us it didn't like Teh Trump, and never talked about Rand Paul enough for us to know if they liked him or not.

So naturally we went with the third grade bully who pretended he had balls, and ignored the guy who had already proven he has balls, and now it's completely understandable that the third grade playground bully has no balls after all, because he doesn't want to get shot and start the Revolution, because then he'd be dead and wouldn't get to go down in history as the guy who started WWIII for the Deep State. And anyone who doesn't understand that is a dirty Democrat, and doing the bidding of the Deep State, because the Deep State is capable of putting up two puppets and pretending they're different so they don't have to care which one we pick, but they aren't capable of having CNN lie to us and pretend they don't like one of them when they really do.

But it isn't us who are getting played, it's you guys who predicted Teh Trump would fold like a road map who got played, even though Teh Trump has, indeed, folded like a road map. Just because you predicted exactly what would happen doesn't mean you weren't getting played. You were obviously getting played because if you weren't, then we were getting played, and that's not an acceptable answer. So we all need to be patient, so in four years when WWIII is over, and the dollar is worthless and all our jobs are gone, and we're all huddled in caves hiding from the radiation, and Teh Trump sends a Twit from his NORAD bunker that he's commuting Assange's sentence from Death to Life, you'll have to stop saying you told us so and we can say we told you so!

Because that's the way George Washington and Thomas Jefferson did it! They mistook bravado for balls all the time, and chose bravado over balls, and sat around reading nothing but the British press because they thought they could tell the British lies from the British truth, and accused all the people who read Thomas Paine and knew what was going on of being brainwashed, and sat around for months trying to convince themselves they did right choosing Benedict Arnold's bravado over Nathan Hale's balls, and that's how we got free, right?

I regret that I have but one +rep to give to this post.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

So which is it--I am so confused. CNN tells everyone the Trump Administration is going to arrest Assange and yet just in March the Media was writing how in-love Trump is with Wikileaks.

He liked the leaks when they damaged his political opponent.

Now that he's in power, not so much.

 

[TheCount]

So which is it--I am so confused. CNN tells everyone the Trump Administration is going to arrest Assange and yet just in March the Media was writing how in-love Trump is with Wikileaks.

There's no reason to be confused - like many other things, Trump supported Wikileaks when it was politically convenient to him.

 

[donnay]

He liked the leaks when they damaged his political opponent.

Now that he's in power, not so much.

LOL! Parroting the CNN narrative, I see. They still think Trump is a Russian operative too.

 

[undergroundrr]

There's no reason to be confused - like many other things, Trump supported Wikileaks when it was politically convenient to him.

But that answer isn't complicated enough.

Honestly, there was no reason for CNN, Infowars or the National Enquirer to even write an article about this. The headline that everybody has known the whole time is "Guy Who Wanted To Hang Snowden Also Wants To Hang Assange."

Duh.

Duh.

Duh.

 

[CPUd]

But that answer isn't complicated enough.

Honestly, there was no reason for CNN, Infowars or the National Enquirer to even write an article about this. The headline that everybody has known the whole time is "Guy Who Wanted To Hang Snowden Also Wants To Hang Assange."

Duh.

Duh.

Duh.

The man himself can admit on video he only cared about them because they were damaging his opponent, but now they need to be shut down. Show his supporters the video, they will say, "he didn't say that!"

 

[Anti-Neocon]

LOL! Parroting the CNN narrative, I see. They still think Trump is a Russian operative too.

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/genetic

 

[Anti-Neocon]

The man himself can admit on video he only cared about them because they were damaging his opponent, but now they need to be shut down. Show his supporters the video, they will say, "he didn't say that!"

It's a video, not even words!

 

[dannno]

If we did, you'd say that at least it's not 500K.

No, that is not what I would say.

 

[dannno]

It's a video, not even words!

Are you confused at what was meant by that statement?

It was not actions, nor was it words that he said, but merely a tweet.

In this case, we have CNN and WaPo sources claiming that the Trump administration is going to do something.

And based on CNN's sources, everybody freaks out, instead of waiting to see if it is even real or not, and then waiting for his actions.. because Trump operates differently from a lot of people. He uses strategies that keep people second guessing so that he can ultimately get what he wants.

If you watched the State of Trump Address, you would know the ACTIONS he has taken have actually been very beneficial, and I'm not talking about foreign policy I'm talking about all the other things he has done that don't seem to get much discussion around here.. for example, two regulations still have to be repealed if you want to add a new one. All kinds of actions that are moving toward shrinking federal agencies. Neil Gorsuch. Good on 99 out of 100 issues, and the one issue everybody on the forum totally flips over when they don't realize there are probably 8 other justices who oppose him on that issue. Many others.

The point remains here. We have things being said, and we might not know the reason why they are being said, but we have no idea if they are actually going to be implemented. In 6 months, I'm pretty sure neither Assange nor Snowden will be in US custody..

Yes, it is disappointing to hear these statements even being uttered, although it may be manufactured by the msm.. but if they are real I just don't see these actions being carried forward or going anywhere without Trump being on board, and I haven't seen any evidence he would be on board with this.

 

[CPUd]

 

[pao]

LOL! Parroting the CNN narrative, I see. They still think Trump is a Russian operative too.

Linking the comment of r3volution 3.0 to CNN does not make it false. How would you explain Trump's flip in regard to Wikileaks? The comment reflects logic, your comment does not.

 

[donnay]

Linking the comment of r3volution 3.0 to CNN does not make it false. How would you explain Trump's flip in regard to Wikileaks? The comment reflects logic, your comment does not.

All other MSM is running off the same CNN narrative. There is no direct link, that I am aware of that Trump said anything of the sort.

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

There's no reason to be confused - like many other things, Trump supported Wikileaks when it was politically convenient to him.

Sounds like most politicians. Or you when you try to present yourself in certain ways on this forum.