"A technique has been developed in the west of punishment as process." | Julian Assange

ClaytonB

Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2011
Messages
10,225
"A technique has been developed in the west of punishment as process." | Julian Assange

From 2015. Give it a watch, throw a like on it, share it around, this is from his wife's channel. Assange has been effectively imprisoned without charges since 2012.



Don't let Assange be killed by being forgotten-to-death. When all else fails, that's their final death-blow. The cases Assange covers in this video are all an open wound: Manning, Snowden, Binney, Greenwald, Poitras, and of course, Assange himself. And we can add to this list the J6 prisoners. The West has transitioned from its former pretense of moral superiority, to openly maintaining out-and-out political prisoners. It has become everything it loudly protested against in the former communist-bloc. If we just "let it slide", if we just "drop it", the whole matter has been conceded and we're next. There is zero possibility of compromise here. Either we put a stop to them, or they will destroy us. There is no middle ground, do not be lulled into believing these people can be reasoned, negotiated or bargained with in any way, shape or form. Look at what just happened with Mike Johnson -- what they call "compromise" is just back-stabbing betrayal. How many more times are we gonna Charlie Brown the Lucy-football? There aren't that many more kicks left in us.

To extend what Assange says here, the West -- that is, the US government, in particular -- has advanced the art of the process-crime far beyond the skill of its ancestors. In former times, Chateau d'If was where innocent political prisoners were sent because those were "the ones they're ashamed of" (The Count of Monte Cristo). Today, however, there is no attempt to hide the fact that the subject is innocent. In fact, that's part of the deal... openly attacking and crucifying an innocent man is a powerful way to send a warning to any others who might be stupid or arrogant enough to thumb their nose at the ruling "elites". But the American tyrants have sharpened the process to a much finer point than the tyrants of Europe or England ever managed to do. The point is not so much whether they are innocent or guilty, but whether they can be made guilty.

"Show me the man, I'll show you the crime" is no longer a statement about the effectiveness of interrogation and torture, it's a statement about the effectiveness of honeypots and sting operations. The FBI, it seems, will gladly plunge their targets into an Inception-like dream-world where up is down, and down is up, in order to "get their man". The actual guilt or actual innocence before the law is utterly beside the point. The point is whether they can save face and kick the living crap out of somebody who dared step out of line... by any means necessary. You might think that "any means necessary" is reserved only for the nation's enemies, but no, "any means necessary" is now standard-operating procedure for any yahoo with a federal badge. And the resources apparently at their disposal in this endeavor would make King Louis XIV to have looked like a blind pauper begging in the dung-covered streets of a Parisian intersection, by comparison. These programs wipe their ass with gold-foil toilet-paper. No expense spared... no such thing even as an "expense". ANY means necessary.

Until people start waking up and realizing that this is operational, and these are the rules they're playing by, they'll continue to stack wins on wins. We don't need to stage a revolution. No, they are the revolutionaries, the mutinous pirates, traitors and rebels. We just need to start waking our fellow patriots up out of their Cabelas-and-white-picket-fence stupor. Time to put away the pollyannaish, wishful-thinking of the past. Time to start examining the real state of our country under the hot white lights of an operating room. The tyrants have picked a game that they lose unless we let them win. They're literally betting that we will let them win. WAKE UP AND DON'T LET THEM WIN!!!
 
Last edited:
Or rather, the process is a punishment. Go ahead, innocent person, plead not guilty and hire a lawyer to vacuum up all your worldly goods.
 
Or rather, the process is a punishment. Go ahead, innocent person, plead not guilty and hire a lawyer to vacuum up all your worldly goods.

Yep. "May the most well-resourced party to this court-proceeding win!"
 
"A technique has been developed in the west of punishment as process." | Julian Assange

Ain't no new news.

"You might beat the rap, but you won't beat the ride." -- Officer Friendly
 
June ETA.

Think JC:

"Just as you would not provide others an out, never shall an out be provided to you."

(From LexEtLibertas, "Re: Donald Sutherland, Star of ‘MASH,’ ‘Klute’ and ‘Hunger Games,’ Dies at 88", Ron Paul Forums: Liberty Forest, June 21, 2024, http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...2-Dies-at-88&p=7236874&viewfull=1#post7236874 .)

* * * * *

The below article by the editor-in-chief of the website WikiLeaks ( https://wikileaks.org ) Julian Assange concerns the entwinement of the Western (particularly the United States') misnomered "security" state (actually, terrorist and mass-death state) with the highest levels of the supposedly "private" internet sector:

* Julian Assange, "Google and the NSA: Who's holding the 'shit-bag' now?", The Stringer, Aug. 24, 2013, https://thestringer.com.au/google-a...hit-bag-now-4691/comment-page-2#comment-21838 , https://web.archive.org/web/2014102...s-holding-the-shit-bag-now-4691#comment-21838 , https://www.webcitation.org/6TZUJpEsv , https://archive.today/VWQ94 , https://megalodon.jp/2014-1025-0541...nd-the-nsa-whos-holding-the-shit-bag-now-4691

The following is my response to Julian Assange's above article, posted by me to the above page on August 29, 2013:

----------

I thank Julian Assange for his present exposé.

Google has long been closely enmeshed with the US intelligence agencies. Dr. Rick Steinheiser in the Office of Research and Development at the CIA and Matt Cutts of the NSA, to name a few, are employed by Google in high-level positions. Google Earth and Google Maps software came from Keyhole, Inc., which was funded by the CIA via In-Q-Tel. As well, Google has been helping the Chinese government in censoring the internet in that country.

Government, whatever its de jure status, strongly tends toward oligarchy. The bigger the government the stronger this tendency will be, since then the stakes of exercising a disproportionate influence over government policy are raised--as big government has the ability to, e.g., make or break business fortunes via its policies and how it chooses to enforce them. That is true every bit as much for formal democracies. Consequently, under government, the strong inclination is a winnowing effect whereby those who rise to the top of the private sector and the government sector are those who are willing to "play along to get along", i.e., amenable to supporting the furtherance of the political establishment's power.

Such applies to media outlets and universities, as well; which, when combined with the government's own schooling and propaganda, inculcates the largest part of individuals' Weltanschauung from cradle to grave: the contents of that worldview being rather thoroughgoing, if muddleheaded and hodgepodge, forms of etatism, accompanying a high degree of political naïveté which such a position implies. Hence, the very intellectual tools which are prerequisite for sustaining an effective defense of liberty are absent most people.

So also due to that effect of winnowing, there tends to be a confluence of ideology at the top level, for accruement of power becomes its own purpose as the government moves toward its logical conclusion: the total state, and all the horrors that come with it. Distinctions such as Democrat and Republican, "liberal" and conservative, etc., are useful for providing hoi polloi with innocuous distractions, but they mean little at the top echelon.

Since all governments (including totalitarian dictatorships) ultimately can only exist due to the "consent" of its subjects (at least "consent" in the sense of resignation), it's understandable why the oligarchic nature of government would not be widely publicized by the political establishment within a formal democracy.

The process of tendency toward oligarchy I've outlined above is intrinsic to government due to the inherent perverse incentive structures which obtain under government (i.e., the internal logic of the system). Ultimately it doesn't matter how pure and good the intentions are of the people who set up the government, nor what type of government is nominally instituted: so long as the defining feature of government exists--that of a regional monopoly on ultimate control over the law--then this process cannot be avoided, since the inherent incentives of the system are such as to reward actors who bring about such outcomes (being that one who is able to inordinately influence the policies of a government can use that influence for his personal benefit and that of his friends, whereas liberty for society is a general benefit which accrues to no one in particular). All the good intentions in the world are no match against perverse incentives.

For those who would like a deeper examination into this most pressing of issue which I touch upon above, see Sec. 8.2.1 of my following article; pp. 63-65 of said section give a methodological analysis of government, with pp. 65-86 giving historical background on some of the more unseemly acts by states, and finally pp. 87-98 of that section giving a history on our present globalist plutocracy: James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network, Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708 [ https://archive.org/details/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything , http://theophysics.host56.com/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , http://sites.google.com/site/physicotheism/home/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , http://alphaomegapoint.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/redford-physics-of-god.pdf ]. This article concerns physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything; however, it also analyzes the societal implications of said, particularly the implications of the exponential advancement of technology and hence also the coming radical life-extension technologies (i.e., transhumanism) in light of a world dominated by a callous oligarchy.
 
Back
Top