Trump admin prepares charges to seek arrest of WikiLeaks' Julian Assange

Who gives a flying $#@! how many boots we have in Syria? Dip$#@!. The dem playbook is airpower and your boy Trump is going to go that route.
It's not like he asked you to do something impossible. We won't know how many boots are on the ground until shit hits the fan. They stopped disclosing visitors to the Whitehouse, troop deployments in Iraq, Syria. I mean are we still pretending that we don't fund both sides of the opposition in Syria? Are we saying that Trump put a stop to this, and put the "genie " back in the bottle?
 
It doesn't matter, until he drops a nuke nothing will.
What makes you think that would/will matter to him either? "Fake news msm Obama Zippy. It's a strategic move dude, Trump has ended war for all eternity. Did you even watch the video I posted that explains it all away? At least it's not ground troops, and besides Hillary would have dropped two nukes! This is far preferable to globalism."
 
Last edited:
YThe government is signaling what they're going to do
I like to hope they are signaling but that doesn't make sense at all. What I tend to think is the government knows that war is unpopular. I think they are trying to provoke people into attacking us or de-sensitize people so they become for the war.
 
What makes you think that would/will matter to him either? "Fake news msm Obama Zippy. It's a strategic move dude, Trump has ended war for all eternity. Did you even watch the video I posted that explains it all away? At least it's not ground troops, and besides Hillary would have dropped two nukes! This is far preferable to globalism."

Exactly. This is a textbook example of cognitive dissonance. Here's another example: several Trumpkins here had Snowden/Hero avatars during Trump's campaign, even while Trump was calling for Snowden's execution.
 
Back to the original topic:
this just proves there isn't an rch difference between democrats and republicans: they all suck, and any hope that the current dipshit in charge would somehow not be terrible is all out the window.

fuck trump. he can not be defended from a liberty perspective on anything. i'm a bit surprised to see it here.

at least it's still 4/20 on my side of the country.

cheers all, and I'm hoping this dump just confirms what freedom minded people have known for years.
(anyone know what happened to the big BofA dump that was supposed to happen about 4 years ago?)
 
Last edited:
Mike Cernovich has dirt on a lot of these neocons in Trump's cabinet that are pushing this stuff, he is just waiting for the right time to release it.

Time may be forthcoming sooner than later, let's see what wikileaks has on them.

f9dee18646a7874a0702406e20a26140.jpg
 
I'm with Dannno here.

What Dannno seems to be saying is "hey, you're saying that CNN isn't full of sht about this Assange thing, well, CNN said there would be 350K troops on the ground. Where is it?"

And what I'm seeing is a whole bunch of people completely missing Dannno's point, which is CNN is full of sht.

Don't you realize that CNN is full of sht? Did you not experience the Ron Paul campaigns?

It just seems that somehow, liberal democrats have taken hold of ronpaulforums and are spewing BS.

The last President to get shot was Reagan, and I was a little kid at the time, many would agree that Reagan wasn't the same after getting shot. The shooter, John Hinckley Jr, was a Bush family friend, or his dad was a big Bush contributor and his brother, Scott, had to cancel dinner plans with Neil Bush. Bush, before VP, was head of the CIA. This is relevant stuff when questioning whether Trump really is going to be able to get what he wants if the CIA doesn't want to do that.

It seems that if you don't do what the CIA wants (or the deep state wants), the CIA or someone on Team Bush might just shoot you. And it seems like all the spying isn't being done to stop terrorism, but to gather dirt against politicians to blackmail them to do what the spies want. Back in 2008, 2012, we all knew this and didn't like it. Since then, there has been more and more proof that what we all knew but didn't have too much evidence is definitely taking place.

Dannno lives within the context of the reality timeline for a Ron Paul supporter. So many here seem to live on this alternate universe timeline where there is no CIA, no deep state, none of that stuff that Ron Paul talked so much about in the campaigns of 2008 and 2012. He was against all that then and he's still against all that now, and so many here seem to be on the side of CNN and the CIA.
 
I'm with Dannno here.

What Dannno seems to be saying is "hey, you're saying that CNN isn't full of sht about this Assange thing, well, CNN said there would be 350K troops on the ground. Where is it?"

And what I'm seeing is a whole bunch of people completely missing Dannno's point, which is CNN is full of sht.

Don't you realize that CNN is full of sht? Did you not experience the Ron Paul campaigns?

It just seems that somehow, liberal democrats have taken hold of ronpaulforums and are spewing BS.

The last President to get shot was Reagan, and I was a little kid at the time, many would agree that Reagan wasn't the same after getting shot. The shooter, John Hinckley Jr, was a Bush family friend, or his dad was a big Bush contributor and his brother, Scott, had to cancel dinner plans with Neil Bush. Bush, before VP, was head of the CIA. This is relevant stuff when questioning whether Trump really is going to be able to get what he wants if the CIA doesn't want to do that.

It seems that if you don't do what the CIA wants (or the deep state wants), the CIA or someone on Team Bush might just shoot you. And it seems like all the spying isn't being done to stop terrorism, but to gather dirt against politicians to blackmail them to do what the spies want. Back in 2008, 2012, we all knew this and didn't like it. Since then, there has been more and more proof that what we all knew but didn't have too much evidence is definitely taking place.

Dannno lives within the context of the reality timeline for a Ron Paul supporter. So many here seem to live on this alternate universe timeline where there is no CIA, no deep state, none of that stuff that Ron Paul talked so much about in the campaigns of 2008 and 2012. He was against all that then and he's still against all that now, and so many here seem to be on the side of CNN and the CIA.

^ This. All of this.
 
How can they go after him, he is not a US Citizen?

Something that I had been wondering, he has never even visited America, right? So the courts lack in personam over Assange. The federalese ought to be focusing on whomever is providing Wikileaks with this information; as Assange only hints that the leaks are from sources, not his groups Intranet cracking and black/grey hat skills.
 
I'm with Dannno here.

What Dannno seems to be saying is "hey, you're saying that CNN isn't full of sht about this Assange thing, well, CNN said there would be 350K troops on the ground. Where is it?"

And what I'm seeing is a whole bunch of people completely missing Dannno's point, which is CNN is full of sht.

Don't you realize that CNN is full of sht? Did you not experience the Ron Paul campaigns?

It just seems that somehow, liberal democrats have taken hold of ronpaulforums and are spewing BS.

The last President to get shot was Reagan, and I was a little kid at the time, many would agree that Reagan wasn't the same after getting shot. The shooter, John Hinckley Jr, was a Bush family friend, or his dad was a big Bush contributor and his brother, Scott, had to cancel dinner plans with Neil Bush. Bush, before VP, was head of the CIA. This is relevant stuff when questioning whether Trump really is going to be able to get what he wants if the CIA doesn't want to do that.

It seems that if you don't do what the CIA wants (or the deep state wants), the CIA or someone on Team Bush might just shoot you. And it seems like all the spying isn't being done to stop terrorism, but to gather dirt against politicians to blackmail them to do what the spies want. Back in 2008, 2012, we all knew this and didn't like it. Since then, there has been more and more proof that what we all knew but didn't have too much evidence is definitely taking place.

Dannno lives within the context of the reality timeline for a Ron Paul supporter. So many here seem to live on this alternate universe timeline where there is no CIA, no deep state, none of that stuff that Ron Paul talked so much about in the campaigns of 2008 and 2012. He was against all that then and he's still against all that now, and so many here seem to be on the side of CNN and the CIA.

Mord approves this. All this ^
 
I'm with Dannno here.

What Dannno seems to be saying is "hey, you're saying that CNN isn't full of sht about this Assange thing, well, CNN said there would be 350K troops on the ground. Where is it?"

And what I'm seeing is a whole bunch of people completely missing Dannno's point, which is CNN is full of sht.

Don't you realize that CNN is full of sht? Did you not experience the Ron Paul campaigns?

It just seems that somehow, liberal democrats have taken hold of ronpaulforums and are spewing BS.

The last President to get shot was Reagan, and I was a little kid at the time, many would agree that Reagan wasn't the same after getting shot. The shooter, John Hinckley Jr, was a Bush family friend, or his dad was a big Bush contributor and his brother, Scott, had to cancel dinner plans with Neil Bush. Bush, before VP, was head of the CIA. This is relevant stuff when questioning whether Trump really is going to be able to get what he wants if the CIA doesn't want to do that.

It seems that if you don't do what the CIA wants (or the deep state wants), the CIA or someone on Team Bush might just shoot you. And it seems like all the spying isn't being done to stop terrorism, but to gather dirt against politicians to blackmail them to do what the spies want. Back in 2008, 2012, we all knew this and didn't like it. Since then, there has been more and more proof that what we all knew but didn't have too much evidence is definitely taking place.

Dannno lives within the context of the reality timeline for a Ron Paul supporter. So many here seem to live on this alternate universe timeline where there is no CIA, no deep state, none of that stuff that Ron Paul talked so much about in the campaigns of 2008 and 2012. He was against all that then and he's still against all that now, and so many here seem to be on the side of CNN and the CIA.

That's right. Here's everyone saying, Teh Trump is doing everything the Deep State says, and when they say Jump he only asks, how high? Why do they sound like Democrats, because of course Democrats complain about the Deep State all the time? Don't you know that CNN lies all the time, except when CNN said the Deep State gave a damn whether Teh Trump or Clinton won, like they weren't identical, because they had to have been telling the truth then even though they never tell the truth ever?

Of course when the media allegedly lied about Trump during the campaign, he always used Twit-er to tell us the truth, and all we've seen on his Twits lately is NATO is good, and Yellin is good, and China isn't a currency manipulator, and that's okay too. Because the CIA will kill him. Never mind that the excuse we all gave for leaving Rand Paul in the dust and chasing after Teh Trump (besides the fact that CNN told us and told us and told us they didn't like Trump, and didn't mention Rand Paul even once) was Teh Trump had the balls to talk like a third grade bully, and Rand Paul told us what was really going on in a rational manner. Never mind that we all saw third grade bullies who were all talk and, when push came to shove, ran like rabbits. Never mind that Rand Paul proved he has balls by standing up in the Senate and pushing back against the Deep State, time and time again, just like his father. Teh Trump talked tough, like he had balls so of course we had to take a chance and elect him, and see if he had balls, because we knew Rand Paul had balls but he didn't talk like a third grade bully, and CNN which always lies except when it says it doesn't like Teh Trump told us it didn't like Teh Trump, and never talked about Rand Paul enough for us to know if they liked him or not.

So naturally we went with the third grade bully who pretended he had balls, and ignored the guy who had already proven he has balls, and now it's completely understandable that the third grade playground bully has no balls after all, because he doesn't want to get shot and start the Revolution, because then he'd be dead and wouldn't get to go down in history as the guy who started WWIII for the Deep State. And anyone who doesn't understand that is a dirty Democrat, and doing the bidding of the Deep State, because the Deep State is capable of putting up two puppets and pretending they're different so they don't have to care which one we pick, but they aren't capable of having CNN lie to us and pretend they don't like one of them when they really do.

But it isn't us who are getting played, it's you guys who predicted Teh Trump would fold like a road map who got played, even though Teh Trump has, indeed, folded like a road map. Just because you predicted exactly what would happen doesn't mean you weren't getting played. You were obviously getting played because if you weren't, then we were getting played, and that's not an acceptable answer. So we all need to be patient, so in four years when WWIII is over, and the dollar is worthless and all our jobs are gone, and we're all huddled in caves hiding from the radiation, and Teh Trump sends a Twit from his NORAD bunker that he's commuting Assange's sentence from Death to Life, you'll have to stop saying you told us so and we can say we told you so!

Because that's the way George Washington and Thomas Jefferson did it! They mistook bravado for balls all the time, and chose bravado over balls, and sat around reading nothing but the British press because they thought they could tell the British lies from the British truth, and accused all the people who read Thomas Paine and knew what was going on of being brainwashed, and sat around for months trying to convince themselves they did right choosing Benedict Arnold's bravado over Nathan Hale's balls, and that's how we got free, right?
 
Last edited:
That's right. Here's everyone saying, Teh Trump is doing everything the Deep State says, and when they say Jump he only asks, how high? Why do they sound like Democrats, because of course Democrats complain about the Deep State all the time? Don't you know that CNN lies all the time, except when CNN said the Deep State gave a damn whether Teh Trump or Clinton won, like they weren't identical, because they had to have been telling the truth then even though they never tell the truth ever?

Of course when the media allegedly lied about Trump during the campaign, he always used Twit-er to tell us the truth, and all we've seen on his Twits lately is NATO is good, and Yellin is good, and China isn't a currency manipulator, and that's okay too. Because the CIA will kill him. Never mind that the excuse we all gave for leaving Rand Paul in the dust and chasing after Teh Trump (besides the fact that CNN told us and told us and told us they didn't like Trump, and didn't mention Rand Paul even once) was Teh Trump had the balls to talk like a third grade bully, and Rand Paul told us what was really going on in a rational manner. Never mind that we all saw third grade bullies who were all talk and, when push came to shove, ran like rabbits. Never mind that Rand Paul proved he has balls by standing up in the Senate and pushing back against the Deep State, time and time again, just like his father. Teh Trump talked tough, like he had balls so of course we had to take a chance and elect him, and see if he had balls, because we knew Rand Paul had balls but he didn't talk like a third grade bully, and CNN which always lies except when it says it doesn't like Teh Trump told us it didn't like Teh Trump, and never talked about Rand Paul enough for us to know if they liked him or not.

So naturally we went with the third grade bully who pretended he had balls, and ignored the guy who had already proven he has balls, and now it's completely understandable that the third grade playground bully has no balls after all, because he doesn't want to get shot and start the Revolution, because then he'd be dead and wouldn't get to go down in history as the guy who started WWIII for the Deep State. And anyone who doesn't understand that is a dirty Democrat, and doing the bidding of the Deep State, because the Deep State is capable of putting up two puppets and pretending they're different so they don't have to care which one we pick, but they aren't capable of having CNN lie to us and pretend they don't like one of them when they really do.

But it isn't us who are getting played, it's you guys who predicted Teh Trump would fold like a road map who got played, even though Teh Trump has, indeed, folded like a road map. Just because you predicted exactly what would happen doesn't mean you weren't getting played. You were obviously getting played because if you weren't, then we were getting played, and that's not an acceptable answer. So we all need to be patient, so in four years when WWIII is over, and the dollar is worthless and all our jobs are gone, and we're all huddled in caves hiding from the radiation, and Teh Trump sends a Twit from his NORAD bunker that he's commuting Assange's sentence from Death to Life, you'll have to stop saying you told us so and we can say we told you so!

Because that's the way George Washington and Thomas Jefferson did it!

LOL! My head is spinning! ;)
 
I'm with Dannno here.

What Dannno seems to be saying is "hey, you're saying that CNN isn't full of sht about this Assange thing, well, CNN said there would be 350K troops on the ground. Where is it?"

And what I'm seeing is a whole bunch of people completely missing Dannno's point, which is CNN is full of sht.

Don't you realize that CNN is full of sht? Did you not experience the Ron Paul campaigns?

It just seems that somehow, liberal democrats have taken hold of ronpaulforums and are spewing BS.

The last President to get shot was Reagan, and I was a little kid at the time, many would agree that Reagan wasn't the same after getting shot. The shooter, John Hinckley Jr, was a Bush family friend, or his dad was a big Bush contributor and his brother, Scott, had to cancel dinner plans with Neil Bush. Bush, before VP, was head of the CIA. This is relevant stuff when questioning whether Trump really is going to be able to get what he wants if the CIA doesn't want to do that.

It seems that if you don't do what the CIA wants (or the deep state wants), the CIA or someone on Team Bush might just shoot you. And it seems like all the spying isn't being done to stop terrorism, but to gather dirt against politicians to blackmail them to do what the spies want. Back in 2008, 2012, we all knew this and didn't like it. Since then, there has been more and more proof that what we all knew but didn't have too much evidence is definitely taking place.

Dannno lives within the context of the reality timeline for a Ron Paul supporter. So many here seem to live on this alternate universe timeline where there is no CIA, no deep state, none of that stuff that Ron Paul talked so much about in the campaigns of 2008 and 2012. He was against all that then and he's still against all that now, and so many here seem to be on the side of CNN and the CIA.

Wait a minute! I thought Trump was the 'man with the balls to stand up to the deep state'. CNN may be/is full of shit, that doesn't change the fact that Sessions said Assange's arrest was a priority and Pompeo described WikiLeaks as a "A non-state hostile intelligence service".

These are Trump appointees, his boys talking. This is all on Trump and nobody else. Liberal my ass.
 
That's right. Here's everyone saying, Teh Trump is doing everything the Deep State says, and when they say Jump he only asks, how high? Why do they sound like Democrats, because of course Democrats complain about the Deep State all the time? Don't you know that CNN lies all the time, except when CNN said the Deep State gave a damn whether Teh Trump or Clinton won, like they weren't identical, because they had to have been telling the truth then even though they never tell the truth ever?

Of course when the media allegedly lied about Trump during the campaign, he always used Twit-er to tell us the truth, and all we've seen on his Twits lately is NATO is good, and Yellin is good, and China isn't a currency manipulator, and that's okay too. Because the CIA will kill him. Never mind that the excuse we all gave for leaving Rand Paul in the dust and chasing after Teh Trump (besides the fact that CNN told us and told us and told us they didn't like Trump, and didn't mention Rand Paul even once) was Teh Trump had the balls to talk like a third grade bully, and Rand Paul told us what was really going on in a rational manner. Never mind that we all saw third grade bullies who were all talk and, when push came to shove, ran like rabbits. Never mind that Rand Paul proved he has balls by standing up in the Senate and pushing back against the Deep State, time and time again, just like his father. Teh Trump talked tough, like he had balls so of course we had to take a chance and elect him, and see if he had balls, because we knew Rand Paul had balls but he didn't talk like a third grade bully, and CNN which always lies except when it says it doesn't like Teh Trump told us it didn't like Teh Trump, and never talked about Rand Paul enough for us to know if they liked him or not.

So naturally we went with the third grade bully who pretended he had balls, and ignored the guy who had already proven he has balls, and now it's completely understandable that the third grade playground bully has no balls after all, because he doesn't want to get shot and start the Revolution, because then he'd be dead and wouldn't get to go down in history as the guy who started WWIII for the Deep State. And anyone who doesn't understand that is a dirty Democrat, and doing the bidding of the Deep State, because the Deep State is capable of putting up two puppets and pretending they're different so they don't have to care which one we pick, but they aren't capable of having CNN lie to us and pretend they don't like one of them when they really do.

But it isn't us who are getting played, it's you guys who predicted Teh Trump would fold like a road map who got played, even though Teh Trump has, indeed, folded like a road map. Just because you predicted exactly what would happen doesn't mean you weren't getting played. You were obviously getting played because if you weren't, then we were getting played, and that's not an acceptable answer. So we all need to be patient, so in four years when WWIII is over, and the dollar is worthless and all our jobs are gone, and we're all huddled in caves hiding from the radiation, and Teh Trump sends a Twit from his NORAD bunker that he's commuting Assange's sentence from Death to Life, you'll have to stop saying you told us so and we can say we told you so!

Because that's the way George Washington and Thomas Jefferson did it! They mistook bravado for balls all the time, and chose bravado over balls, and sat around reading nothing but the British press because they thought they could tell the British lies from the British truth, and accused all the people who read Thomas Paine and knew what was going on of being brainwashed, and sat around for months trying to convince themselves they did right choosing Benedict Arnold's bravado over Nathan Hale's balls, and that's how we got free, right?
Right
 
Wait a minute! I thought Trump was the 'man with the balls to stand up to the deep state'. CNN may be/is full of $#@!, that doesn't change the fact that Sessions said Assange's arrest was a priority and Pompeo described WikiLeaks as a "A non-state hostile intelligence service".

These are Trump appointees, his boys talking. This is all on Trump and nobody else. Liberal my ass.

Right. Supposedly the "selling point" on Trump is that he's a good manager. So....which is it?
 
I am not a Trump supporter, which should be obvious, but I am also aware that since the inauguration there have been several reports of "the administration" considering and planning/preparing to" do things that have not yet come to fruition. Fact is neither the media nor Trump are trustworthy. I guess we will see.
 
Back
Top