Trump admin prepares charges to seek arrest of WikiLeaks' Julian Assange

[Origanalist]

explain this then:





It certainly is in this day and age, especially when people are quoting CNN and MSNBC who right now are saying the riots in venzuela are because of Trump donations. That's what you call FAKE NEWS.

I want primary source. Until then, you can all eat shit.

Eat your own shit you fucking dickhead.

 

[Anti Federalist]

I want primary source. Until then, you can all eat shit.

The president also appeared to side with his advisers' increasingly harder line on Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said Assange's arrest was a priority for the Justice Department as it steps up efforts to prosecute people who leak classified information to the media.

The president said that he was not involved in the decision-making process regarding charging Assange but that the move would be "OK with me."

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/pol...-politics/article145921059.html#storylink=cpy

 

[Anti Federalist]

Isn't Le Pen another far right Trojan horse Mossad candidate? The propaganda I have seen has pointed her at the Russians. I don't know much about their election but I have a feeling its going to be as chaotic as ours was.

I don't give a fuck if she's the man in the moon, just so long as Snowden and Assange have safe asylum somewhere.

 

[nikcers]

I don't give a $#@! if she's the man in the moon, just so long as Snowden and Assange have safe asylum somewhere.

You don't give a fuck if she is a Trojan horse candidate like Trump who is all for WikiLeaks before he gets elected and the afterwards is okay with taking his head?

 

[Origanalist]

Why can't we just criticize Trump on the basis of things that Trump actually does?

Instead of attacking Trump on the basis of things that Trumps enemies say he will do?

Trumps enemies are Ron Paul's enemies, and the enemies of Trump and Ron Paul are not trustworthy. But, somehow, the same people who were attacking Ron Paul and Rand Paul are to be believed. And this is the Ron Paul Forum, this site should be for people who like Ron Paul, but, you know, freedom, I guess that people who don't like Ron Paul can go ahead and take the side of the suckoligopoly who hates Ron Paul.

Sorry, but I will judge him on what he does not whether the people who didn't like RP like him or not. That is completely irrelevant to me.

 

[Origanalist]

 

[UWDude]

The president also appeared to side with his advisers' increasingly harder line on Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said Assange's arrest was a priority for the Justice Department as it steps up efforts to prosecute people who leak classified information to the media.

quote from sessions? I didn't see it in the article. Plus why would he say that, then say "no comment"?

I see it more and more. Just like the Syria "strike". This is to help LePen win. It is crucial she wins.

Women are starting to poll heavily towards LePen. This is to contrast herself with Trump, so woman can accept voting for her.

Add to that the "rapefugee" narrative, and there is going to be a "shocker" in France.

But what I think now is we can cheer for Trump, but the only reasons he is fighting the deep state, (and he is) is so he can install his own.

 

[CPUd]

Don't we all know that there's a real huge shortage of politicians who are against the deep state. Whether Trump is or is not a good manager isn't the point as much as the fact that there just aren't that many human beings on the planet who don't like the deep state and the CIA and want to do battle with those who murder and get away with it.

President Donald would say you are buying into fakenews narrative, just like he said to the CIA on his very first public stop :

 

[Ender]

quote from sessions? I didn't see it in the article. Plus why would he say that, then say "no comment"?

I see it more and more. Just like the Syria "strike". This is to help LePen win. It is crucial she wins.

Women are starting to poll heavily towards LePen. This is to contrast herself with Trump, so woman can accept voting for her.

Add to that the "rapefugee" narrative, and there is going to be a "shocker" in France.

But what I think now is we can cheer for Trump, but the only reasons he is fighting the deep state, (and he is) is so he can install his own.

Watch Sessions in the video in the OP.

 

[Superfluous Man]

Why can't we just criticize Trump on the basis of things that Trump actually does?

Instead of attacking Trump on the basis of things that Trumps enemies say he will do?

Trumps enemies are Ron Paul's enemies, and the enemies of Trump and Ron Paul are not trustworthy. But, somehow, the same people who were attacking Ron Paul and Rand Paul are to be believed. And this is the Ron Paul Forum, this site should be for people who like Ron Paul, but, you know, freedom, I guess that people who don't like Ron Paul can go ahead and take the side of the suckoligopoly who hates Ron Paul.

I have no idea what you're talking about.

But if somebody is criticizing Trump, then at least for whatever time they spend doing that, they're our allies.

 

[Anti Federalist]

You don't give a fuck if she is a Trojan horse candidate like Trump who is all for WikiLeaks before he gets elected and the afterwards is okay with taking his head?

Like Trump how?

Le Pen says on the campaign trail that she will grant Snowden asylum.

Trump said on the campaign trail he would execute him.

 

[Anti Federalist]

quote from sessions? I didn't see it in the article.

Asked whether it was a priority for the justice department to arrest Assange “once and for all”, Sessions told a press conference in El Paso, Texas, on Thursday: “We are going to step up our effort and already are stepping up our efforts on all leaks. This is a matter that’s gone beyond anything I’m aware of. We have professionals that have been in the security business of the United States for many years that are shocked by the number of leaks and some of them are quite serious.”

He added: “So yes, it is a priority. We’ve already begun to step up our efforts and whenever a case can be made, we will seek to put some people in jail.”

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2...iority-says-us-attorney-general-jeff-sessions

 

[UWDude]

Asked whether it was a priority for the justice department to arrest Assange “once and for all”, Sessions told a press conference in El Paso, Texas, on Thursday: “We are going to step up our effort and already are stepping up our efforts on all leaks. This is a matter that’s gone beyond anything I’m aware of. We have professionals that have been in the security business of the United States for many years that are shocked by the number of leaks and some of them are quite serious.”

He added: “So yes, it is a priority. We’ve already begun to step up our efforts and whenever a case can be made, we will seek to put some people in jail.”

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2...iority-says-us-attorney-general-jeff-sessions

The guardian does not play the question, before it plays the answer. The Guardian now says "the whole picture" as it's tagline, bull.

Furthermore, the guardian says this later on:

Republican politicians expressed fury at the time, accusing Assange of treason, and Trump himself told an interviewer: “I think it’s disgraceful, I think there should be like death penalty or something.”

All that changed during the election when WikiLeaks published emails acquired via Russian-backed hackers from the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

I trust nothing they say. I don't even care anymore to waste my time and find the actual full press conference and watch it. Every time I do, all I find is the media is full of it and takes everything out of context. I notice Sessions emphasized the word "ALL" leakers. (P.S. Assange is neither a leaker or hacker).


I trust my gut on this one, this is a ruse to build support for LePen.

from the article:

Barry Pollack, Assange’s lawyer, denied any knowledge of imminent prosecution. “We’ve had no communication with the Department of Justice and they have not indicated to me that they have brought any charges against Mr Assange,” he told CNN. “They’ve been unwilling to have any discussion at all, despite our repeated requests, that they let us know what Mr Assange’s status is in any pending investigations. There’s no reason why WikiLeaks should be treated differently from any other publisher.”

So they are just going to assassinate Assange? I hardly think that is the Jeff Sessions way. The man is all about law and order.

 

[Mordan]

The guardian does not play the question, before it plays the answer. The Guardian now says "the whole picture" as it's tagline, bull.

Furthermore, the guardian says this later on:



I trust nothing they say. I don't even care anymore to waste my time and find the actual full press conference and watch it. Every time I do, all I find is the media is full of it and takes everything out of context. I notice Sessions emphasized the word "ALL" leakers. (P.S. Assange is neither a leaker or hacker).


I trust my gut on this one, this is a ruse to build support for LePen.

from the article:


So they are just going to assassinate Assange? I hardly think that is the Jeff Sessions way. The man is all about law and order.

The sad part is that the libertarian crazies here will create fake news narratives to support their own narrative that Trump supporters were conned.

Trump was OK with torture. I knew that and I disagree with him. If Trump tortures Hillary in jail, I will still disagree with him but that does not mean I have been conned. Same with everything else.

 

[dannno]

You don't give a fuck if she is a Trojan horse candidate like Trump who is all for WikiLeaks before he gets elected and the afterwards is okay with taking his head?

How is Trump a Trojan Horse candidate if he is deep state like you say? The deep state had all the candidates except Rand, they didn't need a Trojan Horse.. neither does France..all of their candidates are deep state except Le Penn.. If Trump is a Trojan Horse, then he is an anti-deep state Trojan Horse, which makes by far the most logical sense.



If the Trump admin is helping Le Penn get elected, then he is doing what he was planning all along, which is to save western civilization.

 

[AZJoe]

Isn't Le Pen another far right Trojan horse Mossad candidate? The propaganda I have seen has pointed her at the Russians. I don't know much about their election but I have a feeling its going to be as chaotic as ours was.

"has her pointed at the Russian." That indeed is kooky propaganda. Le Pen has been a voice of reason regarding Russia. She vows to end sanctions, and to recognize the will of the Crimean people.
Yes, the EU oligarchical establishment does try to label her as "far right", as they label anyone who won't toe the line for European Union centralized planning and its destruction of local sovereignty.

 

[AZJoe]

 

[acptulsa]

How is Trump a Trojan Horse candidate if he is deep state like you say? The deep state had all the candidates except Rand, they didn't need a Trojan Horse..

See Rand run. Run, Rand, Run!

Rand is not controlled by the Establishment. The Establishment is not happy Rand is running. See the Establishment frown.

The Establishment throws lots of candidates in the race. See all the candidates. Candidates and candidates and candidates!

No one cares about all the Establishment candidates. The voters don't want an Establishment candidate. There are more than twelve Establishment candidates. That's more than a dozen! But they aren't stealing enough votes from Rand.

One day, the Establishment is watching NBC. They see an orange clown. They listen to him yell and blather. Blather, blather, blather!

They ask each other, is this guy Establishment like us? Of course he is! He's rich! He bribes politicians all the time, then brags about it! He invited his friends the Clintons to his latest wedding!

But can we fool people into thinking he's an outsider, they ask? Maybe if he and our media yell at each other a lot. Chloris Leachman and Valerie Harper yelled at each other a lot on the Mary Tyler Moore show, and they were good friends. Tony Randall and Jack Klugman yelled at each other a lot on The Odd Couple, and they were good friends. And lots of people believed they yelled at each other even when the cameras weren't filming them, though it wasn't true.

See fans of the shows come up to Mr. Klugman and Ms. Leachman on the street. See them say, you should be nicer! See the Establishment watching this. See them say, these dumbasses aren't any smarter than primary voters. In fact, they are primary voters!

So they threw the orange clown in the race. He bickered with the reporters. Bicker, Bicker, Bicker. And they showed him bickering with the reporters in the morning. They showed him bickering with the reporters in the afternoon. They showed him bickering with the reporters all night, every night. Bicker, bicker, bicker.

And then the pollsters took a poll. Hey, said the pollsters, the dumbasses are buying it! And no one ever pointed a camera at Rand again. All the cameras were pointed at the orange clown. Bicker, bicker, bicker. Blather, blather, blather.

And the people who didn't want an Establishment candidate voted for the orange man. And the Establishment lived happily ever after.

Do we understand now? Or do I need to get it down to the first grade reading level?

But, of course, that's not the question. The question is, are you going to come up with a fresh line of shit? Or are you going to run to a different thread, and continue pretending that this incredibly simple and obvious thing is too adult a concept for you?

 

[dannno]

See Rand run. Run, Rand, Run!

Rand is not controlled by the Establishment. The Establishment is not happy Rand is running. See the Establishment frown.

The Establishment throws lots of candidates in the race. See all the candidates. Candidates and candidates and candidates!

No one cares about all the Establishment candidates. The voters don't want an Establishment candidate. There are more than twelve Establishment candidates. That's more than a dozen! But they aren't stealing enough votes from Rand.

One day, the Establishment is watching NBC. They see an orange clown. They listen to him yell and blather. Blather, blather, blather!

They ask each other, is this guy Establishment like us? Of course he is! He's rich! He bribes politicians all the time, then brags about it! He invited his friends the Clintons to his latest wedding!

But can we fool people into thinking he's an outsider, they ask? Maybe if he and our media yell at each other a lot. Chloris Leachman and Valerie Harper yelled at each other a lot on the Mary Tyler Moore show, and they were good friends. Tony Randall and Jack Klugman yelled at each other a lot on The Odd Couple, and they were good friends. And lots of people believed they yelled at each other even when the cameras weren't filming them, though it wasn't true.

See fans of the shows come up to Mr. Klugman and Ms. Leachman on the street. See them say, you should be nicer! See the Establishment watching this. See them say, these dumbasses aren't any smarter than primary voters. In fact, they are primary voters!

So they threw the orange clown in the race. He bickered with the reporters. Bicker, Bicker, Bicker. And they showed him bickering with the reporters in the morning. They showed him bickering with the reporters in the afternoon. They showed him bickering with the reporters all night, every night. Bicker, bicker, bicker.

And then the pollsters took a poll. Hey, said the pollsters, the dumbasses are buying it! And no one ever pointed a camera at Rand again. All the cameras were pointed at the orange clown. Bicker, bicker, bicker. Blather, blather, blather.

And the people who didn't want an Establishment candidate voted for the orange man. And the Establishment lived happily ever after.

Do we understand now? Or do I need to get it down to the first grade reading level?

But, of course, that's not the question. The question is, are you going to come up with a fresh line of shit? Or are you going to run to a different thread, and continue pretending that this incredibly simple and obvious thing is too adult a concept for you?

Ya I believed that when Rand was running, I could have written that post myself at the time. After Rand dropped out, over time that whole theory sort of eroded. I mean, there are parts that could be true still, like pushing Trump to beat Rand, but the narrative that Trump is controlled kinda disappears. After Rand dropped out, Trump could have became much more establishment oriented. But he didn't, he ended up discrediting the mainstream media, the establishment's tool of control over the people. Why would they do that after Rand already dropped out? They already have two puppets running against each other, there was no reason why they needed to obliterate their primary tool of control over the people.

 

[AZJoe]