Trayvon Martin Supporters Plunder a Local Walgreens

I never said mouth jewelry is menacing, there are plenty of chicks with pierced tongues and lips that don't look menacing.

Grills, however, do make most males look more menacing than if they didn't have them. That is why people get them. Period. Because it looks like they've had their teeth knocked out in fights and they have a lot of skrilla.

Logic. It's important.

Stereotypes. KILL.

I see 3 stereotypes in 1 sentence
 
Stereotypes. KILL.

They also make really funny jokes. Ever watch Dave Chappelle?


I see 3 stereotypes in 1 sentence

Stereotypes are based on probabilities.

images



Those guys could be in a hip hop group or a tv show where they do something to your crib or work at a tattoo shop or any number of "regular" lifestyles or they could be street thugs. If I were walking down the street in a nice suit and had a choice between walking by them and not, I might not on the probability that they are street thugs and decide to rob me.

I don't wear suits, and I never worry about that shit personally, but I'm just saying it is a reasonable thing for some people to do.

Skin color is usually irrelevant.
 
Last edited:
So many different threads on this. Here is my speculation since everyone is entitled to their own speculation on this.

This is a tragic incidence and parents of the victim had the full right to press for a thorough investigation as they are.


This however did not warrant Obama to stoke the issue by invoking his unborn look alike son, his inserting himself in the middle of this could be "race card" politics that his handlers may have instructed him to play.

Probably over zealous watching by a cop wannabe and even some racial bias could have been involved but this is not a gripping black white race war story that some are trying to make it out to be. If recent reports are factual, the shooter himself is a minority, a young man with hispanic-jewish heredity whereas victim is an african-american teen. Best for all sides/media/Obama advisors to take a breath and support a thorough investigation to ensure justice.
 
Hey...Skittles are good!! Don't make me come up there!! LOL
I wish you would , I will fire up the grill and cook some bratwurst for us , but really I would rather run doWn there with my Honey , but , no way we can do that this year .
 
Last edited:
Yes, they apply to everyone.

Hey , I try to behave and act my age , When my youngest son was five , he was in trouble at school , His Mother says , I have to talk to him , so , I told him "You have to be good " , he looks at me , says , " I try to be good , but it is too hard " , I turned my head so he ( and she ) could not see me laugh , and thought , well he has a hard way to go ....
 
So many different threads on this. Here is my speculation since everyone is entitled to their own speculation on this.

This is a tragic incidence and parents of the victim had the full right to press for a thorough investigation as they are.


This however did not warrant Obama to stoke the issue by invoking his unborn look alike son, his inserting himself in the middle of this could be "race card" politics that his handlers may have instructed him to play.

Probably over zealous watching by a cop wannabe and even some racial bias could have been involved but this is not a gripping black white race war story that some are trying to make it out to be. If recent reports are factual, the shooter himself is a minority, a young man with hispanic-jewish heredity whereas victim is an african-american teen. Best for all sides/media/Obama advisors to take a breath and support a thorough investigation to ensure justice.
OK
 
Stereotypes are based on probabilities.

Bingo

Honestly speaking, let's say you were looking for a criminal and there were two black men. One was wearing dockers and and a polo shirt tucked in. The other was wearing jeans with his pants sagging and, of course, wearing a hoodie. I'm definitely going to suspect the latter, it's common sense. I don't think anyone here has every been mugged by a clean cut black guy wearing dockers and a polo shirt, outside of some statistical outlier.

If you were looking for an illegal immigrant, there is a good chance that you're going to be looking for a Hispanic guy and not a middle aged white man. Yes, there are plenty of legal Hispanics immigrants and multi-generational American born Hispanics, but most illegal immigrants are of Latin American origin.

Of course, there are exceptions to the rule. However, those exception do not invalidate the rule.
 
Last edited:
Well the problem is that all witnesses have corroborated Zimmerman's story, except for one who didn't see the incident and was inside her house. Zimmerman says that Trayvon came up behind him and said, "Hey, do you have a problem?", Zimmerman said, "No." and Trayvon said, "Well, you do now!" and decked him, got him on the ground and started beating his head.

You have the version of events as portrayed by the mainstream media.

I don't know which side is correct, but their side is obviously being used to create racial tension and chaos and Zimmerman's side is barely being spread.

Hello Dannno. You're a 9/11 truther right? You often talk about how the official story defies the laws of physics right? Well Zimmeran's "side" defies the laws of physics. Please take a look police video of Zimmerman after the lethal encounter with Trayvon.

http://abcnews.go.com/WN/trayvon-ma...orge-zimmerman/story?id=16022897#.T3R-5dVnNu0

Notice there are no bruises on his face. But also noted Zimmerman's shirt does not have Trayvon's blood on it!

Why is that important? Zimmerman's claim is that he somehow pulled his gun from his waistband with Trayvon still on top of him (how I don't know since Trayvon would have been sitting on the gun) and shot Trayvon from beneath. So why didn't any of Trayvon's blood flow down on top of Zimmerman?

Now Mary Cutcher, the witness that everyone is talking about but you can't seem to find, said she saw Zimmerman straddling Trayvon. Trayvon had already been shot by this point. The only question is, was Zimmerman on top, or beneath Trayvon when he shot him. If he (Zimmerman) was on top, that kind of negates the whole self defense claim. If Zimmerman was on bottom, where's the blood?

And here's Mary Cutcher's statement.

http://insidedateline.msnbc.msn.com...s-parents-say-he-was-headed-on-the-right-path
 
the same people who think zimmerman shouldn't not be arrested for killing trayvon are insinuating that these teenagers should be murdered too.
WOW

you aren't not using double-negatives
 
Hello Dannno. You're a 9/11 truther right? You often talk about how the official story defies the laws of physics right? Well Zimmeran's "side" defies the laws of physics. Please take a look police video of Zimmerman after the lethal encounter with Trayvon.

http://abcnews.go.com/WN/trayvon-ma...orge-zimmerman/story?id=16022897#.T3R-5dVnNu0

Notice there are no bruises on his face. But also noted Zimmerman's shirt does not have Trayvon's blood on it!

Why is that important? Zimmerman's claim is that he somehow pulled his gun from his waistband with Trayvon still on top of him (how I don't know since Trayvon would have been sitting on the gun) and shot Trayvon from beneath. So why didn't any of Trayvon's blood flow down on top of Zimmerman?

Now Mary Cutcher, the witness that everyone is talking about but you can't seem to find, said she saw Zimmerman straddling Trayvon. Trayvon had already been shot by this point. The only question is, was Zimmerman on top, or beneath Trayvon when he shot him. If he (Zimmerman) was on top, that kind of negates the whole self defense claim. If Zimmerman was on bottom, where's the blood?

And here's Mary Cutcher's statement.

http://insidedateline.msnbc.msn.com...s-parents-say-he-was-headed-on-the-right-path

not all gunshot wounds bleed profusely, especially from the entry wound. if he pulled out his gun and shot him, and Zimmerman pushed him off of himself in one motion, it's pretty likely that he wouldn't get blood on his shirt. the lack of facial damage in that pic is pretty interesting though...
 
Sounds more like doing everything possible to justify the KILLING of a teenager, who was minding his business that night, especially by bringing up something SO IRRELEVANT, and not to mention AFTER THE FACT, like what happened to a Walgreens after his killing.

This is how I read the OP's thread:

"Trayvon Martin's killing justified because his Supporters Plunder a Local Walgreens after his death"

I don't know where you get your subtext from, but mine reads "children throw tantrum, use the death of a young man as excuse to steal toasters and trash store."
 
I don't know where you get your subtext from, but mine reads "children throw tantrum, use the death of a young man as excuse to steal toasters and trash store."

Yeah, some here either have absolutely no reading comprehension, or are just plain stupid, I haven't figured which yet. It's quite sad, actually.
 
if you could you'd kiss killerman's feet & congratulate him on a job well done for his contributions to society.

Do you think Trayvon Martin's family, the ones who best honor his memory, were party to this looting? Do you think that they approve of looting a Walrgreens to honor Martin's name?

We're not the ones giving him a bad name. Every idiot that "honors" Martin by doing or supporting random violence is responsible for that. And that means you, too.
 
Back
Top