Tom Woods Slams Jesse Benton

[mczerone]

I respect Tom Woods and agree with him on just about everything. But I'm not crazy about his repeated implications that he could have been the savior of the campaign but was turned down for involvement. I'm an anarchist myself, but sorry to say, Woods, who has clearly identified himself as an anarchist, would not be an asset to the campaign for the hearts and minds of conservative Republican primary voters.

First, how did the official campaign do at converting the GOP stalwarts to our side? Poor, at best. TW could have done as well.

Second, how much better could a well-spoken, principled, true-to-his-ideals TW have done at growing the movement from the outside? There was a ton of room to improve here, too, and TW could have done it well.

 

[Feeding the Abscess]

I respect Tom Woods and agree with him on just about everything. But I'm not crazy about his repeated implications that he could have been the savior of the campaign but was turned down for involvement. I'm an anarchist myself, but sorry to say, Woods, who has clearly identified himself as an anarchist, would not be an asset to the campaign for the hearts and minds of conservative Republican primary voters.

He's good enough to write Ron's books. If he's good enough for that he's certainly good enough to help with the campaign.

 

[LibertyInJeopardy]

And this is why I am floating this idea (the grassroots running things):

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?376736-Start-a-new-pac-The-Ron-Paul-Legacy-Pac