Today Ron Paul on Alex Jones Show, Time, TBD, 11am - 2pm CT

[LibertyEsq]

And please explain why you think Ron Paul going on the AJ show is at all a problem when the redstate blog attacked Ron Paul for something he said on CBS.

It would only be a problem if he went on to talk about 9/11. Which is what I'm sure many people observed when they first read this thread to see he was going on AJ to talk about "false flag terror", and subsequently got attacked for being concerned about it.

 

[Julio154]

The point is that most people who listen to Alex Jones already support Ron Paul or no candidate at all. We need to dramatically increase the voter base that supports Ron Paul. The number of people who listen to Alex Jones is simply not enough votes to win the election. We are in the stage now where we must be appealing enough to sway voters from other mainstream candidates to Paul.

I guess I'm misunderstanding your comment. Is this an argument against Paul appearing on Alex Jones show?

 

[LibertyEsq]

Are you that illogical? Your point throughout this thread is that if Ron Paul goes on the Alex Jones show he might get attacked as a conspiracy theorist. My point has been that it doesn't matter whether Ron Paul goes on or not. They will attack him whenever he goes "off script". I haven't put "words in your mouth" in the least bit.

Aaand when I referred to the Redstate article it was in direct response to your quoted statement that he wasn't getting attacked by neocons this time around on the "truther" topic

And if anyone is emotionally driven here it's you.

Oh really. My first post: "This might hurt him. Hopefully he plugs the moneybomb enough to offset any ammunition this gives the MSM." Queue attacks from about 3-4 people

 

[nbhadja]

No harm done. He won't talk about 911. Obviously Ron Paul is not stupid and he knows that 911 was an inside job, about Fluoride in the water, the CFR, chemtrails.........but if he ever said 911 was an inside job his campaign would be destroyed so that's why he pretends it wasn't.

 

[Crotale]

Infighting gets you nowhere. Agree to disagree and then get on with something productive:

Phone-from-home
Promote the moneybomb and itunes bomb.

 

[jmdrake]

It would only be a problem if he went on to talk about 9/11. Which is what I'm sure many people observed when they first read this thread to see he was going on AJ to talk about "false flag terror", and subsequently got attacked for being concerned about it.

Fair enough. But maybe if you weren't so "anti-AJ", you'd have heard the show enough to know that there are a myriad of other "false flags" that AJ talks about. You jumped to a conclusion. That's okay. We all do sometimes. It's called "being human". affa made a general comment about how all sorts of people freak out about all sorts of things the campaign does, when overall the campaign seems to be doing pretty good. You assumed that was a personal attack. I don't think it was.

 

[jmdrake]

Aaand when I referred to the Redstate article it was in direct response to your quoted statement that he wasn't getting attacked by neocons this time around on the "truther" topic

Fair enough. But even then that's just a small part of the larger attack. I've read quite a few attacks on the "glee" comment. None have taken a truther angle. Rush took the "It's a democrat talking point" angle. Some no-name blogger choosing one particular angle does not a campaign make. Over and over again the smear I've heard has been "We like him...but he just doesn't understand those evil mooslums". Maybe you're experience has been different. Regardless the "truther" smear didn't stick with the man on the street in 2007/2008 and it's not sticking now. The "He doesn't understand the evil mooslum threat and will get us all killed or living under Shareeuuh" is sticking, but we're beating it.

Oh really. My first post: "This might hurt him. Hopefully he plugs the moneybomb enough to offset any ammunition this gives the MSM." Queue attacks from about 3-4 people

Yes. And that was your one and only post.

 

[pappy]

hey ya'll he's on. doing pretty well too. go to infowars and listen. playing up phone from home now and talking about how to win iowa. i missed the first part though

pappy

 

[Nate-ForLiberty]

this is a really good interview.

phone from home program was plugged.

 

[donnay]

NDAA is legalizing Martial Law! This is BIG! Ron Paul said.

Alex asked Dr. Paul what are three things, a goal, he would do when he is President:

1. Change the foreign policy immediately
2. Working on the budget
3. Curtail the power of the Federal Reserve

Now is the time for the maximum effort!

Amazing interview!

I hope to post it when it goes to Youtube!

 

[qwerty]

this is a really good interview.

phone from home program was plugged.

NO MONEYBOMB PLUG ?

 

[Birdlady]

Great interview!

 

[Nate-ForLiberty]

NO MONEYBOMB PLUG ?

not sure, i caught it about 1/3 of the way through i think.

*I wouldn't worry about it though. Alex seems to be ramping up the Ron Paul pimping during his shows lately and on his website. I expect there will be moneybomb promotion out of infowars this week.

 

[pipewerKz]

Didn't hear a moneybomb plug. Heard plenty of ronpaul2012.com plugs though.

Ron should have mentioned it, or one of his staff should have reminded him.

 

[69360]

They just talked about current stuff, no 9/11 right?

I'm reserving judgement for now.

 

[qwerty]

i hate the fact that the campaign expects the moneybombs to be big but don´t use their own resources as well as those could be used...

 

[Nate-ForLiberty]

They just talked about current stuff, no 9/11 right?

I'm reserving judgement for now.

of course no 9/11 stuff.

 

[pipewerKz]

of course no 9/11 stuff.

Alex did have a 9/11 was an inside job t-shirt on during the interview though

 

[green73]

da toobz da toobz

 

[Nate-ForLiberty]

da toobz da toobz

www.youtube.com/TheAlexJonesChannel will probably have it up shortly.