Times: Lieberman branded a racist

Liberty Star

Banned
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
6,118
Was it Drudge who had a headline calling Lieberman a racist politician few weeks ago? Now UK times has come up with a shocking headline.

Are the crticis right in placing the label on him? Will he make a good foreign minister for the cause of freedom in mideast?


From The Times
March 17, 2009

Avigdor Lieberman - branded a racist by critics - set to be foreign minister

James Hider in Jerusalem

Israel's next foreign minister looks set to be Avigdor Lieberman, the Soviet immigrant whose controversial policies have been condemned widely by the country's regional neighbours. His critics accuse him of being an Arab-hating racist but he is hailed by supporters as a strongman who will deal harshly with the state's enemies, in particular Iran, which he has threatened to bomb.

Mr Lieberman has threatened to bomb a number of Israel's neighbours, including Egypt, with whom the Jewish state has a peace treaty. During a parliamentary debate last year Mr Lieberman also criticised Hosni Mubarak, Egypt's President, for never visiting the Jewish state.

Egypt was the first country yesterday to warn that the appointment could cause more setbacks for the peace process. “We are standing before a negative factor that is likely to damage the peace process,”Ahmad Abul Ghait, the Foreign Minister, said during a visit to the European parliament.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article5920555.ece
 
If Israel bombs Iran, they should be on their own. Our defense alliance with them specifies that if they are attacked we will defend them. But if they attack and start a war, they are on their own.
 
If Israel bombs Iran, they should be on their own. Our defense alliance with them specifies that if they are attacked we will defend them. But if they attack and start a war, they are on their own.


"should".....

you can think all you want about what YOU would do....it won't mean shit to what the MACHINE does when it goes down.

You will then realize that without a revolution that what you think doesn't mean shit. there is a CHAIN OF COMMAND....until the top dawgs get "removed" nothing is gonna change. Hell, the recent RIP OFFS with the bailouts prove that without a shadow of doubt.
 
Last edited:
I'll tell you what... if Israel attacks Iran, and Iran strikes back, there would be a HUGE backlash against sending our troops to fight Israel's war that they started. In fact, you might see soldiers refusing to fight. In this day and age, with the net and 24hr news, I can imagine a situation where the military, or parts of it, disobey a ludicrous order like that.
 
I'll tell you what... if Israel attacks Iran, and Iran strikes back, there would be a HUGE backlash against sending our troops to fight Israel's war that they started. In fact, you might see soldiers refusing to fight. In this day and age, with the net and 24hr news, I can imagine a situation where the military, or parts of it, disobey a ludicrous order like that.


why would they have to be involved when they get all the military hardware to use??? They don't need our bodies just our MONEY and WEAPONS (so they don't have to pay for them).
 
They also need us to rebuild Gaza so they have something to bomb. Re-bombing rubble doesn't look so good on the nightly news.

As for Lieberman, he's prejudiced against Democrats. Oh, wait--wrong Lieberman. I was thinking of the Democrat.
 
Yeah don't confuse Avidgor Lieberman, the racist israeli politician with Joe Lieberman, the basset hound senator from Connecticut (no offense to basset hounds).
 
Never happen... the TPTB, and wealth control American Foreign policies. Look for a dozen well conjured justifications. The politicians are just the puppets to the masters that pay for their reelections.

On a darker note: Joe Lieberman can join the ranks of Maxine Waters, Teddy Kennedy, et al, as the: Racists of Capital Hill

Seems like the Lieberman name has something in common around the world. :rolleyes:


If Israel bombs Iran, they should be on their own. Our defense alliance with them specifies that if they are attacked we will defend them. But if they attack and start a war, they are on their own.
 
Last edited:
It's little interesting how headline slightly changed in one day:

From The TimesMarch 17, 2009

Avigdor Lieberman - branded Arab-hating racist - set to be Israeli foreign minister

James Hider in Jerusalem


If Israel bombs Iran, they should be on their own. Our defense alliance with them specifies that if they are attacked we will defend them. But if they attack and start a war, they are on their own.

We had defense alliance with them? Were there any of their soldiers on front lines in Iraq, Afghanistan by any chance?

Had read about hundreds of British and other allies soldiers sacrificing their lives in Iraq as our allies in joint effort there but never heard if they sent any soldiers there. That would have helped since they knew the local language and culture more than any other key ally.
 
Last edited:
That would have helped since they knew the local language and culture more than any other key ally.

You're joking right??

Who would seriously believe that having Israelis on the ground and bustin doors and attacking "insurgents" would go over in the Arab world???

The Neo-cons are misguided but they aren't that stupid. (no matter how much the Islamists would LOVE TO SEE THAT!!!)
 
You're joking right??

Who would seriously believe that having Israelis on the ground and bustin doors and attacking "insurgents" would go over in the Arab world???

The Neo-cons are misguided but they aren't that stupid. (no matter how much the Islamists would LOVE TO SEE THAT!!!)


I wasn't joking, trying to understand why our/British troops "bustin doors" in an arab country would be less hated than Israeli troops doing the same if they are our ally like the rest of our allies?
 
I wasn't joking, trying to understand why our/British troops "bustin doors" in an arab country would be less hated than Israeli troops doing the same if they are our ally like the rest of our allies?


An overwhelming majority of people in these countries resent American and British presence. But if you put Israeli troops on the ground in an Arab/Muslim country it's pretty safe to say there will be a dramatic increase in the number of fighters and suicide bombers. Israel knows this and America knows this and it is why America did not want Israel to take any part of the Iraq invasion. They would lose all support from Turkey, Saudi Arabia, etc.
 
“A passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification.”

George Washington


“The nation which indulges toward another habitual hatred or habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interests."

George Washington
 
Israel isn't stupid. They would never engage in a war of aggression like the U.S. did against Iraq. They would have the sense to use a false-flag with the country they want to invade.
 
Israel isn't stupid. They would never engage in a war of aggression like the U.S. did against Iraq. They would have the sense to use a false-flag with the country they want to invade.

I dunno.... They were pretty explicit in bombing Iraq's nuclear reactor (under construction) back in '81.

Of course, times change.
 
An overwhelming majority of people in these countries resent American and British presence. But if you put Israeli troops on the ground in an Arab/Muslim country it's pretty safe to say there will be a dramatic increase in the number of fighters and suicide bombers. Israel knows this and America knows this and it is why America did not want Israel to take any part of the Iraq invasion. They would lose all support from Turkey, Saudi Arabia, etc.


Ok, that would be then a good reeason not to have them as allies in a war. But I thought Turkey and SA did not support Iraq war decision also.
 
It's little interesting how headline slightly changed in one day:
We had defense alliance with them? Were there any of their soldiers on front lines in Iraq, Afghanistan by any chance?

Had read about hundreds of British and other allies soldiers sacrificing their lives in Iraq as our allies in joint effort there but never heard if they sent any soldiers there. That would have helped since they knew the local language and culture more than any other key ally.

#1 - The US government pays for Foreign countries to join in the Propaganda Campaign against evil terrorists. So in other words, this coalition forces crap is paid for by the American Taxpayers. Then, when they're there, the foreign forces are given secondary/minor hot points, if any. Or the "Token 20 or 200 troops from these other nations paid in Greenbacks and used for the 'Coalition propaganda campaign more than fighting terrorism.
Even Obama's dissed & estranged Reverend Wright brought this up... BTW, Wright is also an Air Force honorable discharged veteran, unlike the Commander and Chief Puppet.

#2 - Hah! If Israel would of sent their IDF forces to Iraq and Afghanistan, there would of been a United Jihad call around the world, with of Millions to fight against the Allies of Evil and their would of been a bulleyes on every Israel that stepped on their soils.

The US and Israel are well aware about most of the world beliefs of Israel... besides Israeli intelligence and their foreign agents, this would escalate to being World War III. AND, no doubt that escalation, would have Israel resorting to using their NUKES.


BTW, while we're on current events, anyone following what's happening in the country of Georgia? Look's like the Georgian people protesting/rallying/calling for President Mikheil Saakashvili to resign immediately. Hmm, the people are realizing the U.S. puppet in power is just that... A puppet to a foreign entity. How many Billions have we thrown away in Georgia?
 
Last edited:
I fogot to say that in all probability, the Israelis probably were covertly involved in the gulf wars with their various assets (just not publicly).

and they don't have to fight much since their lapdogs do it for them :D
 
Back
Top