TIME Claims Elite Cabal Conspired To Stop Trump, Manipulating Laws And News

I don't think they did anything illegal. Trump lost the election on his own. If he or his advisors had kept his mouth shut and off twitter, while making all the same policy decisions, he would have won.

Trump picked up 11 million votes over 2016.
 
My opinion is that it was naturally occurring, but got loose from the Chinese lab that was studying or working with it.

The "studying" they were doing on it was gain of function research to see if they could make it more infectious to humans. The virus was naturally occurring but, by their own admission, they were altering it to do exactly what it is doing now. So....why don't you believe they actually accomplished what they said they were trying to accomplish? :confused:
 
That’s why I go back and forth with these ideas. On the one hand, they really do live in a pseudo-reality (“our shadowy cabal conspiracy saved democracy hooray!!”) and on the other hand, some of the people who live on the outskirts of this reality have to know this will make a whole hell of a lot of people feel even more disenfranchised and the situation even more volatile (and I think that’s what they want).

I don't think pissing people off is what they want. I think it's more of an unintended side effect.

They have an agenda that they must pursue at any cost. If some crazy right-wingers get pissed off in the process, well I guess that happens, but it's not their intent.
 
Did anyone actually read the article? They spun the living snot out of it. The narrative is, they didn't steal, they prevented a theft.

Some of you are reacting like there was an overt admission that the will of the people was subverted. This is a narrative. It's a spin job slick enough to make Swordshyll green with envy.

Yes I read it and yes you are 100% right. "We had to destroy the village in order to save it."
 
They only admitted to the unethical actions, not the illegal ones. Donating millions to get laws changed isn't illegal.

Hypothetically, let's say millions of dollars were donated to pass a law that confiscated all privately held firearms.

Would this be your response?
 
Executive summary: Freight-train loads of counterfeit money was printed by the global central banking syndicate (aka the finance department of the Deep State) and funnelled through Soros+ to his vast network of "democratic" activist groups which used every trick in the book (and invented entirely new tricks) to "secure the proper outcome" of the 2020 election.

Their trick of "recruiting election workers", is particularly insidious.

They effectively ensured that the election buildings were 100% full of super leftists.

To the people who still say:

"Same amount of fraud as any other election"

giphy.gif
 
Their trick of "recruiting election workers", is particularly insidious.

They effectively ensured that the election buildings were 100% full of super leftists.

To the people who still say:

"Same amount of fraud as any other election"

giphy.gif

Yup, a good paying gig. If you could get it. A caller into a show from Penn. said they tried. White, male. Three times they were given the run around while others around him, black, female, were hired on the spot.
 
Hypothetically, let's say millions of dollars were donated to pass a law that confiscated all privately held firearms.

Ummmmmm...that's not hypothetical. That happens every day. It's called "gun control inc."

Would this be your response?

Do I think that people should be able to donate money to support something that is currently illegal and unconstitutional? Ummm...yes. You do not? Once upon a time slavery was protected by the U.S. Constitution. I don't think abolitionist newspapers should have been illegal. Once upon a time people donated millions to change the constitution to make alcohol illegal. Then other people donated millions to reverse that amendment. Some people might want to make flag burning illegal and might donate millions to try to pass a law (which would get struck down again) to change the law or the constitution to facilitate that. It should be legal to donate money to decriminalize marijuana and it should be legal to donate money to keep marijuana criminal. Why would you think otherwise?
 
Do I think that people should be able to donate money to support something that is currently illegal and unconstitutional? Ummm...yes. You do not? Once upon a time slavery was protected by the U.S. Constitution. I don't think abolitionist newspapers should have been illegal. Once upon a time people donated millions to change the constitution to make alcohol illegal. Then other people donated millions to reverse that amendment. Some people might want to make flag burning illegal and might donate millions to try to pass a law (which would get struck down again) to change the law or the constitution to facilitate that. It should be legal to donate money to decriminalize marijuana and it should be legal to donate money to keep marijuana criminal. Why would you think otherwise?

It would be a lot cheaper/easier to just nullify/secede.

Abraham Lincoln removed both of those, as an option.
 
Unsurprisingly, they have made themselves out to be "the good guys". The winner of every war has tried to make themselves "look like the good guys".

It just shows how severe their Mental Illness is. And they have a strong social support structure that continues to validate their extreme an abhorrent behaviors, which functions as a part of their illness.

This serves as a major part of Divide and Conquer. Once you are Divided, you are cut off from YOUR social support structures. I feel like other than the folks here, I am mostly going it alone, even if everyone knows the Govt is now extremely dangerous and how much it lies. Once you are cut off from your Social Support Structure, the odds of them effectively applying their Brainwashing techniques increases dramatically. However, if you are organized and have a common goal, you have REAL power, and can help other people to not feel alone, to understand that although others may not have "perfect" ideas, the idea of Freedom maintains its foothold against Tyranny.
 
Unsurprisingly, they have made themselves out to be "the good guys". The winner of every war has tried to make themselves "look like the good guys".

It just shows how severe their Mental Illness is. And they have a strong social support structure that continues to validate their extreme an abhorrent behaviors, which functions as a part of their illness.

This serves as a major part of Divide and Conquer. Once you are Divided, you are cut off from YOUR social support structures. I feel like other than the folks here, I am mostly going it alone, even if everyone knows the Govt is now extremely dangerous and how much it lies. Once you are cut off from your Social Support Structure, the odds of them effectively applying their Brainwashing techniques increases dramatically. However, if you are organized and have a common goal, you have REAL power, and can help other people to not feel alone, to understand that although others may not have "perfect" ideas, the idea of Freedom maintains its foothold against Tyranny.

It truly is a mental illness. They feel righteous and justified, through all of this. Which makes them just that much more dangerous.
 
Back
Top