Three Crucial Senate Races For The Liberty Movement

I think "first woman to graduate the Citadel" is going to get old really fast, if it hasn't already. The bottom line is that her campaign resume is graduating college, granted it was difficult I'm sure. But so are Harvard and MIT in their own ways.
 
I wonder if Graham will agree to debates? He'll be absolutely destroyed from all sides...
 
I think "first woman to graduate the Citadel" is going to get old really fast, if it hasn't already. The bottom line is that her campaign resume is graduating college, granted it was difficult I'm sure. But so are Harvard and MIT in their own ways.

I don't think she's always pushing it like it's part of a stump speech- just a fact about her. Besides, weren't you originally for Mace to the fact that you were one of the contributors to one of the Facebook pages about her?
 
Sarah Palin has also been supporting Rand Paul in recent days. She also happens to be a Tea Party neo-conservative who supports him because she hates "the establishment" and "the lame street media". There is no guarantee that Mace is a liberty candiadate. Not only does she not have a record, but she has also given no indication that she is a libertarian. If both candidates are equal, I am going to support the candidate with the sterling voting record.

Sarah Palin opposes foreign aid, intervention in Libya and intervention in Syria. She's also now against the NDAA and Patriot Act. Her foreign policy and national security stance is more or less the same as Mike Lee's. She is not a neoconservative, she's a convert. All the real neocons are attacking Rand (Cotton, King, McCain, Kristol, Krauthammer, Christie).
 
Sarah Palin opposes foreign aid, intervention in Libya and intervention in Syria. She's also now against the NDAA and Patriot Act. Her foreign policy and national security stance is more or less the same as Mike Lee's. She is not a neoconservative, she's a convert. All the real neocons are attacking Rand (Cotton, King, McCain, Kristol, Krauthammer, Christie).

I did not hear that she has changed her views. Good for her. Were these changes before or after her endorsement of Rand Paul during his 2010 Senate campaign?
 
I don't think she's always pushing it like it's part of a stump speech- just a fact about her. Besides, weren't you originally for Mace to the fact that you were one of the contributors to one of the Facebook pages about her?

I was all in for Mace because I was hearing Bright was out of it. I must have bad sources. And after Bright announced, I was pissed at him for some time because of what I felt was a lack of coordination.

However, I have settled down and now I am backing Bright. One reason is that I think Mace's background is going to be so old nobody wants to hear about it anymore, and two because Bright is more viable, three because Bright is the better messenger. I was left looking for more after seeing Mace on TV. In this race you have to be on the attack.
 
Back
Top