This may be the rule that gives us majority in Louisiana

[Revolution9]

Aspartame may be the cause... i've been drinking a lot of diet sodas lately...
A cup of coffee is actually helping me see straight right now.

Rumsfields gift to the NWO. banned initially as a poison it was shoved through by Rumsfield under Reagan. At 87 degrees fahrenheit it breaks down into formaldehyde and aspartic acid. It is responsible for at minimum 97 major syndromes and illnesses that are severely debilitating or can cause death. please stop. The Revolution needs you.

Thanks
Randy

 

[Bradley in DC]

someone contact them or contact RP HQ.

Chief legal counsel for the campaign is Joe Becker, [email protected]

 

[torchbearer]

Brent and Sandra, if you guys in LA can work out a whole timeline of events, it would probably prove very useful to the effort. I added the RNC call of the convention (November 9th, 2007).

Jenninlouisiana would be a great help in this process too. I know she's probably taking a needed rest... but I hope she gets online soon to help us get a timeline completed.
She was very involved with the state GOP and their changes.

 

[torchbearer]

some state statutes brought to my attention:

§1463. Political material; ethics; prohibitions
A. The Legislature of Louisiana finds that the state has a compelling interest in taking every necessary step to assure that all elections are held in a fair and ethical manner and finds that an election cannot be held in a fair and ethical manner when any candidate or other person is allowed to print or distribute any material which falsely alleges that a candidate is supported by or affiliated with another candidate, group of candidates, or other person, or a political faction, or to publish statements that make scurrilous, false, or irresponsible adverse comments about a candidate or a proposition. The legislature further finds that the state has a compelling interest to protect the electoral process and that the people have an interest in knowing the identity of each candidate whose number appears on a sample ballot in order to be fully informed and to exercise their right to vote for a candidate of their choice. The legislature further finds that it is essential to the protection of the electoral process that the people be able to know who is responsible for publications in order to more properly evaluate the statements contained in them and to informatively exercise their right to vote. The legislature further finds that it is essential to the protection of the electoral process to prohibit misrepresentation that a person, committee, or organization speaks, writes, or acts on behalf of a candidate, political committee, or political party, or an agent or employee thereof.


What would that "reagan pro-life slate" be considered?

 

[joenaab]

Rumsfields gift to the NWO. banned initially as a poison it was shoved through by Rumsfield under Reagan. At 87 degrees fahrenheit it breaks down into formaldehyde and aspartic acid. It is responsible for at minimum 97 major syndromes and illnesses that are severely debilitating or can cause death. please stop. The Revolution needs you.

Thanks
Randy

torchbearer (and others), rev9 is correct. this was a poison that was, by chance, found to be sweet. it failed all FDA testing miserably, and there is a long, well-documented history of this (many books, websites and two great documentaries cover the subject). rumsfeld, in exchange for shares in the company, pushed it through and made a fortune. this chemical literally eats away at your brain and is associated with close to 100 neurological disorders.

Never, ever consume Aspartame. Really, never consume any soft drink whatsoever. This is a bit OT, but since we're talking about migraines, here's a few other reasons not to drink soft drinks.

1. The phosphoric acid and carbonic acid added to make bubbles make softdrinks the most acidic thing consumed by humans. It exasperates the condition of Acidosis and leaches calcium out of your bones to maintain a blood-pH of 7.3.

2. The chemical additives of artificial color, flavor and preservatives are toxic in your body and are very difficult to eliminate. Over time they accumulate and break down your immune system and can lead to every type of chronic disease known.

3. The sugar version has 7-10 teaspoons of refined sugar, the consumption of which wreaks havoc on your adrenaline and nervous system.

4. The aluminum from the can "outgases" into the beverage and enters your body and can cause any number of chronic diseases, particularly Altzheimers. In this case, "aluminum" won't be listed as an ingredient on the can, but you'll be getting plenty of it.

5. If you drink it from a two-liter plastic container, you are drinking "ptlatlets" or "plasticizers" which are the outgas of plastic, which enter the liquid and you, via the liquid. Plasticizers are linked to every known mental and physical disease. They are a fertilizer for cancer. They are a female hormone mimic and are the leading culprit in importency and sexual disfunction.

6. The caffeine pollutes your kidneys and wreaks havoc on your adrenaline system. This is the same for coffee so give that up too! Green tea has a healthier form of caffeine, some green teas have mateine, and green teas are loaded with anti-oxidants, the very thing you need to help you purge all these stored up toxins.

7. By consuming these chemicals you enrich the petroleum-chemical industry, who are the very enemies of our cause. Don't support them with your hard-earned money. All you'll get in return is cancer and migraines.

peace, jn

 

[Tanner]

Jackpot

some state statutes brought to my attention:

§1463. Political material; ethics; prohibitions
A. The Legislature of Louisiana finds that the state has a compelling interest in taking every necessary step to assure that all elections are held in a fair and ethical manner and finds that an election cannot be held in a fair and ethical manner when any candidate or other person is allowed to print or distribute any material which falsely alleges that a candidate is supported by or affiliated with another candidate, group of candidates, or other person, or a political faction, or to publish statements that make scurrilous, false, or irresponsible adverse comments about a candidate or a proposition. ...

What would that "reagan pro-life slate" be considered?

WE HAEV A WINNAR!

Now...the matter proving the intent and duration of the pro-life/pro-choice chumps.

 

[Bradley in DC]

http://www.gop.com/images/Press_State_Summaries.pdf

REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE

2007 - 2008 Rule No. 15(e)
Delegate Selection Overview Summaries for Presidential Primaries, Caucuses, & Conventions

The information contained in this document was compiled by the RNC Counsel’s Office based on the Rule No. 15(e) filing as submitted and certified by the states and territories to the Secretary of the RNC.
If you have questions about the information contained in the summaries and filings, please contact the individual state or territory in question.

LOUISIANA 2008

Numbers
47 Total Delegates
• 3 RNC, 21 CD and 23 AL
Important Dates (revised dates as of 12/20/07)
Delegate Filing: 1/10/08 at 5 p.m.
CD Caucuses/Conventions: 1/22/08
Primary: 2/09/2008
State Convention: 2/16/08
Selection Method
Closed Primary, Caucus, Convention

Delegates:

AL – bound, if allocated

CD – unbound

o 23 may be bound (depending on election results)

o 24 Unbound

Selection Details
AL – Delegate allocation: Winner-take-all, if 50%; if no majority, then AL delegates are “uncommitted.”
Delegate election: At State Convention.

CD – Delegate allocation: n/a
Delegate election: CD Meetings at State Convention elects CD delegates that are “uncommitted.”

 

[kirkblitz]

news?

 

[literatim]

some state statutes brought to my attention:

§1463. Political material; ethics; prohibitions
A. The Legislature of Louisiana finds that the state has a compelling interest in taking every necessary step to assure that all elections are held in a fair and ethical manner and finds that an election cannot be held in a fair and ethical manner when any candidate or other person is allowed to print or distribute any material which falsely alleges that a candidate is supported by or affiliated with another candidate, group of candidates, or other person, or a political faction, or to publish statements that make scurrilous, false, or irresponsible adverse comments about a candidate or a proposition. The legislature further finds that the state has a compelling interest to protect the electoral process and that the people have an interest in knowing the identity of each candidate whose number appears on a sample ballot in order to be fully informed and to exercise their right to vote for a candidate of their choice. The legislature further finds that it is essential to the protection of the electoral process that the people be able to know who is responsible for publications in order to more properly evaluate the statements contained in them and to informatively exercise their right to vote. The legislature further finds that it is essential to the protection of the electoral process to prohibit misrepresentation that a person, committee, or organization speaks, writes, or acts on behalf of a candidate, political committee, or political party, or an agent or employee thereof.


What would that "reagan pro-life slate" be considered?

You can get that entire slate thrown out and Ron Paul will sweep all delegates!

 

[torchbearer]

Can someone get this info to someone who can handle this from the campaign?
It will cost us $10,000 to get a good attorney in this state to take this case.
We can do it... but in this one thread alone we have developed quite a case against the state LAGOP.

 

[torchbearer]

Bradley, you da man!

http://www.gop.com/images/Press_State_Summaries.pdf

REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE

2007 - 2008 Rule No. 15(e)
Delegate Selection Overview Summaries for Presidential Primaries, Caucuses, & Conventions

The information contained in this document was compiled by the RNC Counsel’s Office based on the Rule No. 15(e) filing as submitted and certified by the states and territories to the Secretary of the RNC.
If you have questions about the information contained in the summaries and filings, please contact the individual state or territory in question.

LOUISIANA 2008

Numbers
47 Total Delegates
• 3 RNC, 21 CD and 23 AL
Important Dates (revised dates as of 12/20/07)
Delegate Filing: 1/10/08 at 5 p.m.
CD Caucuses/Conventions: 1/22/08
Primary: 2/09/2008
State Convention: 2/16/08
Selection Method
Closed Primary, Caucus, Convention

Delegates:

AL – bound, if allocated

CD – unbound

o 23 may be bound (depending on election results)

o 24 Unbound

Selection Details
AL – Delegate allocation: Winner-take-all, if 50%; if no majority, then AL delegates are “uncommitted.”
Delegate election: At State Convention.

CD – Delegate allocation: n/a
Delegate election: CD Meetings at State Convention elects CD delegates that are “uncommitted.”

BINGO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[torchbearer]

I just got this through my meet-up emails:

Subj: Plaintiffs



Good Evening Folks,

As you all know, we are suing the Republican Party of Louisiana for mishandling the entire caucus process and attempting to walk off with our victory. However, we need people (our delegates) to be the plaintiff's in the case. Please speak with the delegates in your district and find several delegates and alternates that are willing to put their names down on the suit as plaintiffs.


Please send me the names of the people who are willing as soon as possible.

Thanks!

--
Andrew Axsom
Louisiana Field Director
Ron Paul 2008
www.ronpaul2008.com

 

[torchbearer]

Looks like we can use all the info we can gather here to help take the LAGOP to the woodshed, can someone get this thread to campaign people?
I know they have attorney's that have been looking things over... but it is possible we hit upon things they haven't thought of yet...

 

[JonathanR]

Great work and great news!!

 

[pepperpete1]

Perhaps contact the campaign attorney

Looks like we can use all the info we can gather here to help take the LAGOP to the woodshed, can someone get this thread to campaign people?
I know they have attorney's that have been looking things over... but it is possible we hit upon things they haven't thought of yet...

One of our supporters posted the name of Joe Becker, [email protected]
as the campaign attorney, who would know better of what recourse the campaign is taking?

I will e-mail him and ask if he would please take a look at our thread here and maybe he will respond with some news.

 

[patriotcalendar]

Great detective work here, TB!

Hey, I realize you have an attorney scoped out & that the campaign appears to be taking on litigation as well...

but just in case this could come in handy at some point...

remember Tom Cryer? (the Shreveport attorney who beat the IRS awhile back)

His contact info is at the above link.. seems like he would be a liberty-minded attorney.. in the event you end up wanting to talk to one

 

[torchbearer]

Great detective work here, TB!

Hey, I realize you have an attorney scoped out & that the campaign appears to be taking on litigation as well...

but just in case this could come in handy at some point...

remember Tom Cryer? (the Shreveport attorney who beat the IRS awhile back)

His contact info is at the above link.. seems like he would be a liberty-minded attorney.. in the event you end up wanting to talk to one

Give credit to pepperpete1, she's been digging up this info for me.
I've just been putting the pieces together from being on the ground here.

 

[jake]

inspiring thread, carry on the torch of justice! this battle is only just beginning

 

[torchbearer]

//

 

[literatim]

Can someone get this info to someone who can handle this from the campaign?
It will cost us $10,000 to get a good attorney in this state to take this case.
We can do it... but in this one thread alone we have developed quite a case against the state LAGOP.

If you take donations, I am sure you can easily get enough from Grassroots. Don't use PayPal, they may try and freeze the account like they did to the Granny Warriors and New Hampshire recount.