This is the type of voter that - No One But Paul - is directly aimed at.

Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
117,616
From Shamity's forum:

October 15th, 2011, 8:54 pm
drylok
Constitution Holder And..
Hannitized Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Emanuel Regime Of ILL ANNOY
Posts: 7,625

Thanks to all of you 3rd party folks we now have a marxist in the white house, national health care to repeal, 2 SCOTUS justices appointed that would just assume run the BORs through a shredder and you don't even bat an eye about it.

hxxp://forums.hannity.com/showpost.php?p=96204191&postcount=20

Nope, didn't bat an eye at all.

Guess what?

There are thousands more of us this time around.

And we're not voting for the "system".

So what do you want to do, Typical GOP Voter?

Unite behind a man with the most solid conservative record in the field, or jerk off and guarantee another four years of Obama?

You decide.

Because we don't care about phony arguments and scare tactics anymore.

One is as bad as the other.

NO ONE BUT PAUL
 
I hope you don't use that kind of language when speaking directly to potential supporters.
 
2 SCOTUS justices appointed that would just assume run the BORs through a shredder and you don't even bat an eye about it.
LOL @ that. :p

I bet this person never batted an eye at the DOHS, or the PATRIOT Act, or going to war without declaration in Iraq either. They don't give a crap about the Constitution or civil rights unless it's a Democrat in the WH. That's all talking points for them.
 
About a month ago I called into the local talk radio program and had a good 15 minute talk about this very thing. I made all the points you did. Simply said if Ron or Gary do not get the nomination then I would be voting Libertarian again and there is nothing he can do about it. Also said that we are taking his party and maybe not this go around but withing the next 10 years it will be decisively our party.

I was angry that day because before I got on the host laid out a plethora of Paul fallacies, and called Paul supporters uninformed and such. Needless to say I was a little pissed off and did use that bumper sticker saying that goes something like 'irony is having conservatives accuse libertarians of being naive on government and economics.'
 
From Shamity's forum:



Nope, didn't bat an eye at all.

Guess what?

There are thousands more of us this time around.

And we're not voting for the "system".

So what do you want to do, Typical GOP Voter?

Unite behind a man with the most solid conservative record in the field, or jerk off and guarantee another four years of Obama?

You decide.

Because we don't care about phony arguments and scare tactics anymore.

One is as bad as the other.

NO ONE BUT PAUL

October 15th, 2011, 8:54 pm
drylok
Constitution Holder And..
Hannitized Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Emanuel Regime Of ILL ANNOY
Posts: 7,625

Thanks to all of you 3rd party folks we now have a marxist in the white house, national health care to repeal, 2 SCOTUS justices appointed that would just assume run the BORs through a shredder and you don't even bat an eye about it.

hxxp://forums.hannity.com/showpost.p...1&postcount=20

We need to thoughtfully convince and persuade people that it would have been the same with McCain. That this is no longer a left-right paradigm, but an up to freedom or down to the ashes of tyranny battle.
 
Last edited:
I'm pretty sure he means:

Unite behind Ron Paul or you will get four more years of Obama.

This ^^

A vote for anyone but Ron Paul in November 2012 is a vote for Obama. There are enough of us united behind Ron Paul that we control the election.
 
This ^^

A vote for anyone but Ron Paul in November 2012 is a vote for Obama. There are enough of us united behind Ron Paul that we control the election.

That's literally true. Unfortunately that's just fine with those controlling the elections. Obama or Romney are bothed owned by the same peeps so....
 
That's literally true. Unfortunately that's just fine with those controlling the elections. Obama or Romney are bothed owned by the same peeps so....

I agree. Yet, many regular VOTERS may want to enjoy peace and prosperity rather than perpetual wars, endless unemployment and escalating debts. Wouldn't it be cool if Ron Paul received more Democratic votes than O-bomb-a in order to bring the troops home.
 
I agree. Yet, many regular VOTERS may want to enjoy peace and prosperity rather than perpetual wars, endless unemployment and escalating debts. Wouldn't it be cool if Ron Paul received more Democratic votes than O-bomb-a in order to bring the troops home.

Sure. All I am saying is that "they" don't care if Romney loses because of us. They own both of those jackasses in the horse race. 4 more yrs of Obama is just fine with "them".
 
Back
Top