No, Tulsi Gabbard is NOT This Election's Ron Paul

[Anti Globalist]

She couldn't do all that surfing wearing a bikini?

 

[Marenco]

She couldn't do all that surfing wearing a bikini?

 

[XNavyNuke]

Apparently Frau Gabbard is this election's Bernie Sanders.

Payback: Democrats rig Tulsi Gabbard right out of their next debate
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/08/payback_democrats_rig_tulsi_gabbard_right_out_of_their_next_debate.html

Tracey also noted that Gabbard was well above the campaign donor threshhold with 160,000 unique donors from all 50 states which ought to have gotten her in. But according to his piece, the Democratic Party bigs are weighing the matter towards polls they arbitrarily say the key ones, superceding even money raised in a rather subjective process, moving the goalposts. It all raises questions about how rigged those particular polls might be, or if they made those decisions just to Get Gabbard out.

Ah, the sweet smell of democracy!

XNN

 

[oyarde]

I do not think any legitimate poll can be found that puts her at two percent . Not a real candidate . Never was as I foretold .

 

[RJB]

I hold the same position that I hold for the Supreme Court. There is a heavy biase toward ugly women: Ginsberg, Sotomayor, etc, they are all hideous. Strictly in the name of diversity, I want more beautiful women in positions of power. Tulsi could fill this gap.

 

[Occam's Banana]

I hold the same position that I hold for the Supreme Court. There is a heavy biase toward ugly women: Ginsberg, Sotomayor, etc, they are all hideous. Strictly in the name of diversity, I want more beautiful women in positions of power. Tulsi could fill this gap.

Among this lot, it's as good a criterion as anything else, I suppose.

And if we're gonna get screwed anyway, well ...

 

[sam1952]

Her chances are in the negative.

Like interest rate are heading

 

[XNavyNuke]

Gabbard Gutted By DNC's Dubious Debate Dodge
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-08-24/berniegate-20-gabbard-gutted-dncs-dubious-debate-dodge

A South Carolina poll published Aug. 14 by the Post and Courier placed Gabbard at 2%. One might have again vainly assumed that the newspaper with the largest circulation in a critical early primary state would be an “approved” sponsor per the dictates of the DNC, but it is not. Curious.

Gabbard has a unique foreign-policy-centric message that is distinct from every other candidate, and she has managed to convert a shoestring campaign operation into a sizable public profile. (She is currently in Indonesia on a two-week National Guard training mission, therefore missing a crucial juncture of the campaign.) Other candidates poised for exclusion might also have a reasonable claim to entry -- Marianne Williamson passed the 130,000 donor threshold this week -- but the most egregious case is clearly Gabbard.

XNN

 

[Theocrat]

Tulsi is Still Terrible

The only two things Rep. Gabbard has in common with Dr. Ron Paul are:

• She boldly calls out her own political party for its corruption and failure to uphold its principles, and
• She is against interventionist foreign policies.

Other than those things, she is a Progressive, through and through, which means she is an enemy of a true, Constitutional republic and has no respect for the rule of law, private property, the life of the defenseless unborn, and pretty much every other individual right given to us from God, not the State.

 

[Swordsmyth]

The only two things Rep. Gabbard has in common with Dr. Ron Paul are:

• She boldly calls out her own political party for its corruption and failure to uphold its principles, and
• She is against interventionist foreign policies.

Other than those things, she is a Progressive, through and through, which means she is an enemy of a true, Constitutional republic and has no respect for the rule of law, private property, the life of the defenseless unborn, and pretty much every other individual right given to us from God, not the State.

She is also a liar and a hypocrite about foreign policy.