This is a very powerful read from the Constitution Party

Dave Wood

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2007
Messages
1,810
Dear Fellow Constitution Party Members,

Like many others, I was sorely disappointed in Ron Paul’s decision this weekend to stay within the Republican Party. Quoting from his letter:

“Of course, I am committed to fighting for our ideas within the Republican party, so there will be no third party run. I do not denigrate third parties — just the opposite, and I have long worked to remove the ballot-access restrictions on them. But I am a Republican, and I will remain a Republican.”

I have been thrilled with how much attention and support Ron Paul has received. Never before have I seen our values and beliefs get so much attention from the mainstream media. He has done more than any other person to raise our standard high. I publicly endorsed the man, and was a Ron Paul for President precinct captain. However, I was saddened by his refusal to take his candidacy to the next step.

Ron Paul would have made an incredible Constitution Party nominee. He would have brought more people into the party, united us under one banner, and given us more exposure than ever before. Ron Paul supporters are enthusiastic, dedicated Constitutionalists who are willing to sacrifice and work for their cause. Paul’s views clearly have no home in the GOP (thus his poor primary polling numbers) but would have received much better numbers in a general election. Republicans may not have elected him, but Americans could have.

Yet, Dr. Paul knows he will not capture the GOP nod and believes he should focus on keeping his seat in Congress. I have heard many others echo this same sentiment. What a loss it would be for us to lose Ron Paul in Congress – our ONLY voice in Washington. I share those concerns, but I have a far greater scheme in mind.

We often hear it said that freedom is never free. That is 100% correct. If we wish to regain our freedom and God-given liberty, we must be willing to sacrifice. If it means losing a House seat, we must be willing to sacrifice that for the greater good and future of the nation.

The Ron Paul Revolution often reminds us of another revolution back in 1776. In that year, 55 men signed the Declaration of Independence. They signed this document knowing this would sever all ties with England. It was a point of no return. Not only was there no longer a safety net, each of these signers knew should they lose in their efforts, this document would turn into their death warrant. They were willing to sacrifice everything. Now it is our turn.

If we are ever going to win the fight for freedom and liberty, we must be willing to put all on the line. Ron Paul took the first step, and now has decided to go back to the safety of his Congressional district. I applaud his efforts and thank him for his hard work. But, someone needs to pick up the mantle. Some needs to pick up where he left off – that is the job of the Constitution Party.

I do not know who our nominee will be. We have some excellent possibilities – Chuck Baldwin, Bob Smith, Alan Keyes, Judge Roy Moore, or others who are willing to throw their hat into the ring. But no matter who our nominee is, there is hard work for us ahead. We must all be willing to sacrifice and lay it all on the line in the next months leading up to November.

Our first step is choosing a nominee. We ought to be praying right now for God’s guidance in this crucial area. We want just the right man. Along with this, each state should be trying their best to get as many people to Kansas City for the convention as possible. Your voice cannot be heard if your body is not present.

Second, we need to secure ballot access for our nominee. No matter who we choose, they have no possibility of success if people cannot vote for him. This is difficult in some states. It will take great amounts of effort to see this accomplished. Yet, let us remember – it is worth the effort, the time and the money involved. We are fighting for freedom!

Third, we need to get the word out. We ought to be willing to sacrifice our time and go door-to-door and let people know we exist! Let’s get the bumper stickers and yard signs out for all to see. Let’s write the editors of our papers and take every opportunity to let everyone know what we stand for!

This may mean taking time off of work. This will require great amounts of money. In a word: sacrifice. I know not everyone can give thousands or take off much time from work. But we all can do something. Together, we can all do something great.

2008 can be the greatest year the Constitution Party has ever had. Our message is getting out there. Ron Paul had a lot of success. Ron Paul did not have success in the Republican party, because his views are not Republican views – they are Constitutional. Constitutional values transcend this two-party system and reaches out into all demographics, voting blocs and social classes. We can make some headway.

Last year, I ran for Congress in a special election. At first, my only goal was to get on the ballot in order to give the party some exposure. I now look back on that as the biggest mistake of my campaign. You see, I never thought any one would listen to me. Boy, was I wrong! I had to turn down speaking engagements! We have an audience out there. I live in liberal Massachusetts, but everyday I found more people who believe just as we do. They are out there. Had I actually set the goal of winning that election, who knows what could have happened?

Being Ron Paul’s precinct captain here in Brockton, MA, I paid close attention to the voter turn-out on February 5 (Super Tuesday). Our Secretary of State boasted of a great voter turn-out that day – 30%. That was a great turn-out! That means 70% of those registered to vote did not vote! They chose to sit out. That means two things. First, it means that we still do not know what the majority of voters in Massachusetts think. We know that the minority of citizens that show-up to the polls are liberal. This gives us 70%, millions of people, to work with! That is encouraging. Second, this statistic means the overwhelming majority of registered voters are not happy with their current crop of choices. They are not thrilled with anyone in the two major parties, at least not enough to drive to a voting place. America is ripe for a third party.

Now is not the time to be discouraged because one man has decided not to run with us. Now is the time to dig in our heals and prepare for the fight ahead. I’ve said it once, and I will say it again – Liberty is worth the fight!

Kevin Thompson
 
I'm a Libertarian, but have been involved with the Constitution Party in the past. This letter KILLS the letter the LP sent out.
 
I like the constitution party. They have a long ways to go though if they are wanting to get someone elected to office. Do they have anybody elected to office yet?
 
I like the constitution party. They have a long ways to go though if they are wanting to get someone elected to office. Do they have anybody elected to office yet?

I've heard that they have a few elected to local offices.
 
I notice something that seems to be recurring with our kinds of candidates-- the ones that are worth votes.

We good men (and women) hop into these races and expect to only make a small dent and not get very far. McCain was able to turn around his campaign because he had a must-win mindset from the beginning. If you're going to run for office, do everyone a favor and make the right preparations in order to expect the win.
 
If McCain gets the nom, I'll vote Constitution or Libertarian. I'd rather lean Constitution, but we'll see what kind of candidates they end up with.

Before I was involved with Ron Paul, I was into the Constitution Party. Good stuff.

I think RP deserves more credit than this letter gives, though. But I don't care to get sidetracked with picking nits.
 
I notice something that seems to be recurring with our kinds of candidates-- the ones that are worth votes.

We good men (and women) hop into these races and expect to only make a small dent and not get very far. McCain was able to turn around his campaign because he had a must-win mindset from the beginning. If you're going to run for office, do everyone a favor and make the right preparations in order to expect the win.

McCain was a establishment candidate, he got hours of free coverage on national news everyday, endorsements from establishment owned newspapers across the country etc.
 
Support the constitutionmoneybomb.com

March 4 2008
Please post constitutionmoneybom b.com everywhere
Facebook
Myspace
In the bottom of your emails
Dailypaul.com
on this site as well
call in to Ron Paul Radio 877 646-2008
at the bottom of every online post
If you know a Ron Paul Website owner please ask them to post a banner or
link to constitutionmoneybom b

We will all be thankful for our efforts!!!

P.S. will you be so kind to put this event on your meetup calendar, email the group and ask them to promote this. Thank You!!!
 
I'm a Libertarian, but have been involved with the Constitution Party in the past. This letter KILLS the letter the LP sent out.

The reason this letter kills the LP letter, is because the LP is scrambling trying to build the party, they are not focused on principle.

Yes I know that Libertarians were HUGE ing supporting RP, I am not dissing Libertarians, but the Libertarian Party (the Party, not the members) is nowhere near the CP organization, imo.
 
I like alot of the Constitution Party's principles, I just can't support them. Their "platform" sounds too intolerant of other religions.

And I quote

"The Constitution Party, gratefully acknowledges the blessing of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ as Creator, Preserver and Ruler of the Universe and of these United States. We hereby appeal to Him for mercy, aid, comfort, guidance and the protection of His Providence as we work to restore and preserve these United States.

This great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason peoples of other faiths have been and are afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here.

The goal of the Constitution Party is to restore American jurisprudence to its Biblical foundations and to limit the federal government to its Constitutional boundaries."


I don't like that.
 
Time for the two parties to unite and get over the petty diferences. The Constitutional Libertarian Party needs to come together.
 
My problem with the Constitution Party, and the big reason I don't think it'll ever quite take off, is that it's too built on religion and spirituality. That's fine on a personal level, but making that the basis for your political party's platform is too much for me. Other than that, their ideas are mostly great (they're still too "populist" on issues like drug prohibition, for example, but we can have dialogue about that) and their people are awesome.

That said, I haven't checked out their website in a few years, so they may have toned down the religious rhetoric.
 
I like alot of the Constitution Party's principles, I just can't support them. Their "platform" sounds too intolerant of other religions.

And I quote

"The Constitution Party, gratefully acknowledges the blessing of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ as Creator, Preserver and Ruler of the Universe and of these United States. We hereby appeal to Him for mercy, aid, comfort, guidance and the protection of His Providence as we work to restore and preserve these United States.

This great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason peoples of other faiths have been and are afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here.

The goal of the Constitution Party is to restore American jurisprudence to its Biblical foundations and to limit the federal government to its Constitutional boundaries."


I don't like that.

Unalienable rights granted by a Creator is the foundation upon which the U.S. was built. That Creator was recognised as the God of Christianity. Not denominational Chistianity just Christianity in general.

The Constitution Party does not aim to force you to be a Christian, their goal is to restore the respect and authority of the Constitution.

Without the recognition of a Creator there can be no unalienable rights as everything simply becomes subjective and a violation of ones rights simply becomes "not nice" as opposed to being morally wrong.
 
That said, I haven't checked out their website in a few years, so they may have toned down the religious rhetoric.

HA! Half of their state affiliates left the national party because one of them nominated a candidate that was pro-life with the exception of rape and incest, and not 100% pro-life. I doubt that.
 
I like alot of the Constitution Party's principles, I just can't support them. Their "platform" sounds too intolerant of other religions.

And I quote

"The Constitution Party, gratefully acknowledges the blessing of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ as Creator, Preserver and Ruler of the Universe and of these United States. We hereby appeal to Him for mercy, aid, comfort, guidance and the protection of His Providence as we work to restore and preserve these United States.

This great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason peoples of other faiths have been and are afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here.

The goal of the Constitution Party is to restore American jurisprudence to its Biblical foundations and to limit the federal government to its Constitutional boundaries."


I don't like that.

As a non-christian constitutionalist, neither do I. One does not have to be a christian to be a constitutionalist, so WTF?

Shouldn't their party be renamed the Jesus Christ Party?

Not saying I wouldn't vote for a Chuck Baldwin type, but I'm not joining something that would have me be in agreement with those statements that are quoted... if I did, I would be lying, and I doubt they want liars in their midst.
 
Unalienable rights granted by a Creator is the foundation upon which the U.S. was built. That Creator was recognised as the God of Christianity. Not denominational Chistianity just Christianity in general.

The Constitution Party does not aim to force you to be a Christian, their goal is to restore the respect and authority of the Constitution.

Without the recognition of a Creator there can be no unalienable rights as everything simply becomes subjective and a violation of ones rights simply becomes "not nice" as opposed to being morally wrong.

"The Constitution Party, gratefully acknowledges the blessing of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ as Creator, Preserver and Ruler of the Universe and of these United States. We hereby appeal to Him for mercy, aid, comfort, guidance and the protection of His Providence as we work to restore and preserve these United States.


Did you not read that part? If it wants to acknowledge a creator. Then acknowledge a creator but not a spicific one. I don't like when people think that their religion is the only path to heaven.
 
Back
Top