It isn't martial law. People are not prohibited from leaving their homes. Civil law has not been suspended. The 4th amendment has not been suspended. People are voluntarily cooperating with the "authorityes". Presumably because they are of one mind that they want the murderer caught as soon as possible.
Repeat - this is not martial law.
It isn't martial law. People are not prohibited from leaving their homes. Civil law has not been suspended. The 4th amendment has not been suspended. People are voluntarily cooperating with the "authorities". Presumably because they are of one mind that they want the murderer caught as soon as possible.
Repeat - this is not martial law.
It isn't martial law. People are not prohibited from leaving their homes. Civil law has not been suspended. The 4th amendment has not been suspended. People are voluntarily cooperating with the "authorities". Presumably because they are of one mind that they want the murderer caught as soon as possible.
Repeat - this is not martial law.
It isn't martial law. People are not prohibited from leaving their homes. Civil law has not been suspended. The 4th amendment has not been suspended. People are voluntarily cooperating with the "authorities". Presumably because they are of one mind that they want the murderer caught as soon as possible.
Repeat - this is not martial law.
It isn't martial law. People are not prohibited from leaving their homes. Civil law has not been suspended. The 4th amendment has not been suspended. People are voluntarily cooperating with the "authorities". Presumably because they are of one mind that they want the murderer caught as soon as possible.
Repeat - this is not martial law.
That makes it even better. It's voluntary martial law. Police and military are doing house to house searches without warrants. Justified? Maybe under the circumstances. Bad precedent? Most definitely!
Ain't no such thing as voluntary martial law. Martial law is the suspension of civil law and replacement with law by military edict. That has not happened. The military did not issue edicts requiring people to do anything.
Also, warrantless searches are perfectly lawful under civil law IF you consent.
Show me a case where searches are happening without consent and without probable cause and you might have a case. Show me where people are ordered to stay inside by the military under threat of some kind of penalty and you might have a case.
I have seen no evidence of that.
The presence of tanks and troops does not equal martial law.
Martial law has a precise meaning. This isn't it.
And if someone choses not to comply?
For the standpoint of acclimatizing the American people, which is what the OP seems to have been talking about, none of what you just said matters.
Merely pointing out that when people are calling this event "martial law" they are using the term incorrectly. If people want to use the term incorrectly because it has more "impact", have at it. It's still wrong.![]()