“This is a system-wide collapse” - Texas border overwhelmed

[Anti Federalist]

Except not, and only a moron would think so. Immigration is not invasion. Hence the existence of the two separate words. Oh, and the fact that America didn't have an immigration laws for over a century of its existence. I should expect this kind of language twisting form a Federalist like yourself though as you follow in Hamilton's footsteps to enlarge the powers of the central government and destroy the rights of the people. Progressives like yourself will never be satisfied with anything elss than a total State even as you mimic the language of liberty for your own twisted ends.

Yes it is.

 

[Anti Federalist]

I don't get you guys. Why don't you just add him to your ignore list? I too am amazed at his prolific posting ability, could be more than one person behind it. Don't know.

But I like his presence here. So I hope he doesn't get banned. I don't have time to read all of his posts, but he posts a lot of article I would not see otherwise.

Honestly.

 

[ATruepatriot]

I don't get you guys. Why don't you just add him to your ignore list? I too am amazed at his prolific posting ability, could be more than one person behind it. Don't know.

But I like his presence here. So I hope he doesn't get banned. I don't have time to read all of his posts, but he posts a lot of article I would not see otherwise.

There is another more important factor in this other than "self". The board... If you kick everyone you don't like off the board it ends up having only three members. The platform cannot sustain it's self and be worth the server space and effort to keep alive with an elite club of only three members.. it would fold and no one would have it.

I'm enjoying his articles too, and he keeps the board moving and "active". Without activity and participation to draw interest you got nothing.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Oh, and the fact that America didn't have an immigration laws for over a century of its existence.

In a review of history, who is generally regarded as the most libertarian president ever?

 

[Anti Federalist]

And proof that SS is not a Christian. Indeed, given his love of the wicked powers that rule the planet and his worship of the brutality of the State, it quickly becomes obvious that he is simply another child of the Devil seeking to hide his lies, a wolf in sheep's clothing.

My reading of the Bible says that the ultimate deceiver, Anti-Christ, will come as a man of peace, unity and togetherness.

 

[Anti Federalist]

There is another more important factor in this other than "self". The board... If you kick everyone you don't like off the board it ends up having only three members. The platform cannot sustain it's self and be worth the server space and effort to keep alive with an elite club of only three members.. it would fold and no one would have it.

I'm enjoying his articles too, and he keeps the board moving and "active". Without activity and participation to draw interest you got nothing.

Because, just like people not wanting liberty, they do not want to have their biases questioned.

They want an echo chamber.

Based on all the frothing and foaming going on, I'd say a nerve has been touched.

 

[Dr.3D]

Because, just like people not wanting liberty, they do not want to have their biases questioned.

They want an echo chamber.

Based on all the frothing and foaming going on, I'd say a nerve has been touched.

 

[Schifference]

 

[Dr.3D]

 

[Schifference]

It is not safe! But, Does it really matter?

 

[specsaregood]

Because, just like people not wanting liberty, they do not want to have their biases questioned.

They want an echo chamber.

Based on all the frothing and foaming going on, I'd say a nerve has been touched.

I used to think it was sad when they bitched and moaned and complained for bannings; now I just think it is funny. I too enjoy SS's presence here and anybody that doesn't like it can Go Fuck Themselves.

 

[Anti Federalist]

I used to think it was sad when they bitched and moaned and complained for bannings; now I just think it is funny. I too enjoy SS's presence here and anybody that doesn't like it can Go Fuck Themselves.

I have never been in favor of bans, or banning, regardless of who they were or what they posted, (with exception of obvious bots; you know, Earn $6500 a month online...Dick pills delivered discretely to your door...that kind of shit).

That said, I enjoy SS's posts as well, he's on top of the news cycle, no doubt.

I see nothing in his post history that indicates any serious rules violations that would warrant a banning.

And before those who do not like SS chime in and say, "Well, that's cuz he agrees with you", keep in mind I have consistently said the same thing about Zippy, and never once called for him to be banned.

 

[Dr.3D]

It is not safe! But, Does it really matter?

Only if he hits a nerve.

 

[TheTexan]

To help get this thread back on topic, securing the border is great, but it's only half the solution.

The other half is deporting the Mexicans who are already here. I would recommend going door to door as the best approach. This can be done most efficiently if ICE is given the voting history / party registration for each address. Trump voting households wouldn't need to be searched. But Hillary voters may be hiding Mexicans in their attic and/or basement, so those would need to be searched thoroughly and accomplices punished accordingly.

Given the sheer number of Mexicans we would need to deport, I would recommend loading them on to trains, for logistical reasons.

This would finally be a solution I think.

 

[ATruepatriot]

To help get this thread back on topic, securing the border is great, but it's only half the solution.

The other half is deporting the Mexicans who are already here. I would recommend going door to door as the best approach. This can be done most efficiently if ICE is given the voting history / party registration for each address. Trump voting households wouldn't need to be searched. But Hillary voters may be hiding Mexicans in their attic and/or basement, so those would need to be searched thoroughly and accomplices punished accordingly.

Given the sheer number of Mexicans we would need to deport, I would recommend loading them on to trains, for logistical reasons.

This would finally be a solution I think.

Lol... And right back in it...

 

[Dr.3D]

To help get this thread back on topic, securing the border is great, but it's only half the solution.

The other half is deporting the Mexicans who are already here. I would recommend going door to door as the best approach. This can be done most efficiently if ICE is given the voting history / party registration for each address. Trump voting households wouldn't need to be searched. But Hillary voters may be hiding Mexicans in their attic and/or basement, so those would need to be searched thoroughly and accomplices punished accordingly.

Given the sheer number of Mexicans we would need to deport, I would recommend loading them on to trains, for logistical reasons.

This would finally be a solution I think.

Well, I did see pictures of them coming this way, on top of trains.

They would probably find it nice to ride inside for a change.

 

[TheTexan]

From a budget perspective, it may seem uneconomical at first to go to door to door looking for Mexicans.

But we can recoup most or even all of those costs, by putting them in work camps, to build the wall.

 

[Swordsmyth]

From a budget perspective, it may seem uneconomical at first to go to door to door looking for Mexicans.

But we can recoup most or even all of those costs, by putting them in work camps, to build the wall.

And dig the canal.

 

[nikcers]

From a budget perspective, it may seem uneconomical at first to go to door to door looking for Mexicans.

But we can recoup most or even all of those costs, by putting them in work camps, to build the wall.

If we start organ harvesting we can sell the parts on the black market and make a killing.

 

[TheTexan]

If we start organ harvesting we can sell the parts on the black market and make a killing.

I think you have a good idea here but we wouldn't want to facilitate the black market or any other illegal activity with this.

There are plenty of legal law-abiding white Americans who are waiting on official donor lists who could use these organs.