Theology of Paul from a Christian Deist

[euphemia]

Indeed. I'm not sure what you are about Ronin Truth. It seems like you think the number of links you post is somehow support for what the links say. Truth is not a democracy. Posting a majority of information doesn't make it true.

 

[Ronin Truth]

Indeed. I'm not sure what you are about Ronin Truth. It seems like you think the number of links you post is somehow support for what the links say. Truth is not a democracy. Posting a majority of information doesn't make it true.

I seem to still be a work in progress, I'm often not quite sure either.

The problems are further compounded by a very pesky sometimes out of control muse that just seems to like to hang around here and to contribute.

I see my often self defined role of being that of an access to information provider. I strongly believe in the 'work smarter, not harder' adage.

My Google link bombs lead to a lot of info contained in a very small space. Sometimes valuable to spur conversation, stir the pot, yank chains and or rattle cages. They do seem to be very widely misunderstood. That's OK too.

If they bother you, just ignore them and don't use them. Whatever. <shrug>

Does that help?

 

[erowe1]

My Google link bombs lead to a lot of info contained in a very small space.]

Usually they don't. They lead to a lot of assertions. But assertions do not constitute info.

 

[euphemia]

Usually they don't. They lead to a lot of assertions. But assertions do not constitute info.

Indeed. And not very well respected scholarship, either.

 

[Ronin Truth]

Usually they don't. They lead to a lot of assertions. But assertions do not constitute info.

Do Biblical assertions constitute ANY info?

 

[Ronin Truth]

Indeed. And not very well respected scholarship, either.

Do better, the field is wide open.

 

[euphemia]

I'm not sure if you are aware, but there are people here with degrees in theology. Not really inclined to try to discuss anything with someone whose degree has Google on it.

 

[heavenlyboy34]

If anything, I'm a layman psychologist, philosopher and scientist.

You fancy yourself a philosopher? LOL. Even Molyneux is a far better philosopher than you, and that's setting the bar VERY low.

 

[erowe1]

Do Biblical assertions constitute ANY info?

Yes. But what usually happens with your links is that they make a bunch of unbiblical assertions inexplicably sprinkled with references to Bible verses that don't support those assertions.

And then when you are asked to comment on this phenomenon, you never do.

We are all left to wonder what the point is.

 

[hells_unicorn]

Christian Deist as a concept makes about as much sense as "military intelligence" or "a circle with corners". You can't be both one and the other since one is necessarily a rejection of the other.

That's what I think of the OP. Carry on.

 

[Ronin Truth]

Yes. But what usually happens with your links is that they make a bunch of unbiblical assertions inexplicably sprinkled with references to Bible verses that don't support those assertions.

And then when you are asked to comment on this phenomenon, you never do.


We are all left to wonder what the point is.

Could it be because I'm not the thread topic?

If you find yourself wondering about it, it may just be over head, and not really intended for you.

So assertions CAN constitute info, but only when they're OK with you. Right. Got it.

 

[erowe1]

So assertions CAN constitute info

Not without evidence.

So, just to be clear, what you're saying is that all these threads where you complain about other people not discussing the thread topic, you also don't want them to discuss the thread topic with you, because you're not willing to discuss it yourself?

 

[Ronin Truth]

I'm not sure if you are aware, but there are people here with degrees in theology. Not really inclined to try to discuss anything with someone whose degree has Google on it.

And a couple here with IQs higher than either Hawking or Einstein. I may be missing your point. Degrees and the paper chase rarely impress me.

If you lock a jackass in a college for four years, is he still a jackass when he gets out?

Do you have any plans for an ON TOPIC post soon?

 

[Ronin Truth]

You fancy yourself a philosopher? LOL. Even Molyneux is a far better philosopher than you, and that's setting the bar VERY low.

That's LAYMAN if/and when you decide to read for comprehension ........ EVER. Molyneux and I are not competitors, we very often agree.

 

[Ronin Truth]

Mostly just ignoring and running from the REAL thread topic. From my repeated observations that has come to be the most typical Paulinista Mafia distraction and diversion tactic.

Notice how wacko it makes them when others do the same to them. Great role model there Saul/Paul, I think I'll just stick with Yashua for this branch of my spiritual investigations.

"By their fruits, ye shall know them."​

 

[Sola_Fide]

That's LAYMAN if/and when you decide to read for comprehension ........ EVER. Molyneux and I are not competitors, we very often agree.

What is your philosophy?

 

[euphemia]

Yu

And a couple here with IQs higher than either Hawking or Einstein. I may be missing your point. Degrees and the paper chase rarely impress me.

If you lock a jackass in a college for four years, is he still a jackass when he gets out?

Do you have any plans for an ON TOPIC post soon?

Not anything like you get with one + Google.

Biblical criticism begins and ends with the Bible. If you don't do the actual reading yourself and form conclusions based on what you read, I'm afraid you are not going to be able to see whether the claims of those articles are true or not. You are not yet ready to discuss anything.

 

[Sola_Fide]

I picture Ronin's philosophy like this:

 

[erowe1]

Do you have any plans for an ON TOPIC post soon?

This is totally disingenuous. When people make on topic posts, you refuse to engage them.

When will you make an on topic post?

 

[erowe1]

I picture Ronin's philosophy like this:

I can see that. Maybe a mix of that guy and the guy in this video.