The 'Yes' to Sex App

Out of curiosity, why do you think female submission is the key to a great, kinky sex life? Or am I misunderstanding you?
I think the man leading the relationship has all sorts of benefits, including sexual. In my experience, most women want to be controlled in the bedroom, even if they're not formally into dominant/submissive play. Women like a dominant mate, most of the time. This is of course not to say that there isn't time to be tender and loving, of course there is, but there's also a time to demand things of her, and make it clear that she belongs to me.
 
It's human nature, much like it is human nature how most people hate freedom.

People didn't live very long up until 100 years ago or so, therefore being married until death do you part, was more likely than not.

Now, stick two people together for 20-30-40 years or more, and before long, they begin to loathe the very sight, smell and voice of the other person.

The sad part is, that loathing is usually one sided, one or the other will still look at their partner, who despises them, with love and affection and desire.

That and people are brought up to be narcissists. Only caring about themselves
 
I think the man leading the relationship has all sorts of benefits, including sexual. In my experience, most women want to be controlled in the bedroom, even if they're not formally into dominant/submissive play. Women like a dominant mate, most of the time. This is of course not to say that there isn't time to be tender and loving, of course there is, but there's also a time to demand things of her, and make it clear that she belongs to me.

A lot of women love being treated like shit, that's why crap like 50 Shades of Grey is so "Haaawt" Oh and that's why a lot end up in abusive relationships.
 
I think the man leading the relationship has all sorts of benefits, including sexual. In my experience, most women want to be controlled in the bedroom, even if they're not formally into dominant/submissive play. Women like a dominant mate, most of the time. This is of course not to say that there isn't time to be tender and loving, of course there is, but there's also a time to demand things of her, and make it clear that she belongs to me.

I think it depends on the people and the situation but I see what you're saying.
 
A lot of women love being treated like shit, that's why crap like 50 Shades of Grey is so "Haaawt" Oh and that's why a lot end up in abusive relationships.

Of course women find it "hot".

The domineering alpha male is rich.

If it was some guy in a house trailer with a rusty pickup truck, it would be an episode of Cops.
 
Of course women find it "hot".

The domineering alpha male is rich.

If it was some guy in a house trailer with a rusty pickup truck, it would be an episode of Cops.
That's not really true. I'm currently dating three women, two of whom are my submissives, and I'm not rich. Now, I don't know how it compares to 50 Shades stuff, but being "alpha" has much more to do with attitude and action than wealth. Alpha fucks, beta bucks.
 
The type of women that are overly submissive are the ones that will cheat on you because they don't know how to say no. And I'd rather spend my time with an intellectual equal than some meat puppet I hump a few times a week.
I reiterate my previous comment. Submitting to a particular person in the bedroom doesn't mean you're submissive elsewhere or with other people. Women who are submissive in context A are often dominant in context B, and I hear the same is true of men. It's not about being "overly submissive", you don't want someone spineless, but the vast majority of women appreciate the man taking control, particularly when it comes to sex.
 
I sure am glad to be married, otherwise I may need one of these...

attachment.php
That "lady" one looks like it's straight out of Videodrome. Very disturbing indeed. That stealth one is just laughable.
 
That's not really true. I'm currently dating three women, two of whom are my submissives, and I'm not rich. Now, I don't know how it compares to 50 Shades stuff, but being "alpha" has much more to do with attitude and action than wealth. Alpha fucks, beta bucks.

Dating...LOL

Try that shit after being married 20 or 30 years.

She'll clap you upside your head with a frying pan.

ETA - And I maintain it is more true than not.

The protagonist of 50 Shades is hot to women because he is fabulously wealthy.
 
Last edited:
Dating...LOL

Try that shit after being married 20 or 30 years.

She'll clap you upside your head with a frying pan.

ETA - And I maintain it is more true than not.

The protagonist of 50 Shades is hot to women because he is fabulously wealthy.
You might be right about that. My longest relationship has been a little over a year, so I wouldn't know.

I haven't read or seen 50 Shades, and yes, his wealth is certainly part of it, I wouldn't deny that. Even more important though, is that he's a dominant, confident, attractive male who introduces a young, innocent, virginal girl to a world of carnal exploration she never imagined before. It's better to be someone like that without a lot of money, than a beta bucks who makes tons of money, and only attracts gold diggers. There was a story about a homeless young man who only has a roof over his head each night because he hooks up with a different girl every single evening, and he pulls it off. Now, he's a degenerate obviously, but the point is that good game can offset low income remarkably.
 
Back
Top