The Worst Presidential Foreign Policy Debate Drinking Game Ever

mac_hine

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2011
Messages
1,225
Found this on Farcebook. It's written by a dude named Matt Walsh http://www.facebook.com/mattwalshradio?ref=ts&fref=ts
Head over to his page and give him some love. He's also made some great YouTube videos http://www.youtube.com/user/TheMattWalshShow

In the past my debate drinking games have resulted in widespread alcohol poisoning. With this in mind I've decided to come up with a drinking game for tonight's foreign policy debate that is sure to keep everyone stone cold sober.

I'm calling it:

The Worst Presidential Foreign Policy Debate Drinking Game Ever

Here it goes.

Chug a beer if:

- Either candidate says the word "constitution".

- Either candidate mentions Just War theory

- Either candidate brings up the CIA overthrow of Iran's Mohammed Mossadeq in 1953 and accurately traces our current diplomatic tensions with that country back to this event

- Either candidate discusses blowback and talks about the deadly results of excessive micro-managing overseas: i.e. the rise of Osama bin Laden and Sadam Hussein, both of which were at one point funded and armed by the United States

- Either candidate says the word "interventionism"

- Either candidate talks about the obvious contradiction inherent when a government that takes away our liberty at home claims it's concerned with protecting liberty overseas

- Either candidate pledges to end all foreign aid, or pledges to continue it and then offers an intelligent and logical defense of the practice

- Either candidate quotes the Founding Fathers' philosophy on warfare

- Either candidate, rather than simply assert our duty to "protect democracy" all over the world, actually offers a sound philosophical and strategic justification for the idea

- Either candidate says anything remotely insightful at any point about anything

By now your beer should be flat, you haven't taken a single sip and you are still tragically lucid. Sorry about that.
-------------

If your goal is to get shitfaced, I would recommend chugging a beer every time you hear these Words:

Israel

Regime

Nuclear weapons (regarding Iran)

Terrorism

al queda

Brave men and women in uniform

American values

Jihad

I definite recommend drinking light beer. Otherwise, it will probably get ugly.
 
Just shared this with some friends (not taking credit of course). This might be the way to get the masses to actually read something about politics.
+rep
 
i was drunk when this started.....................i am now sober, and have buried my head in my hands...sobbing quietly...
 
Found this on Farcebook. It's written by a dude named Matt Walsh http://www.facebook.com/mattwalshradio?ref=ts&fref=ts
Head over to his page and give him some love. He's also made some great YouTube videos http://www.youtube.com/user/TheMattWalshShow

In the past my debate drinking games have resulted in widespread alcohol poisoning. With this in mind I've decided to come up with a drinking game for tonight's foreign policy debate that is sure to keep everyone stone cold sober.

I'm calling it:

The Worst Presidential Foreign Policy Debate Drinking Game Ever

Here it goes.

Chug a beer if:

- Either candidate says the word "constitution".

- Either candidate mentions Just War theory

- Either candidate brings up the CIA overthrow of Iran's Mohammed Mossadeq in 1953 and accurately traces our current diplomatic tensions with that country back to this event

- Either candidate discusses blowback and talks about the deadly results of excessive micro-managing overseas: i.e. the rise of Osama bin Laden and Sadam Hussein, both of which were at one point funded and armed by the United States

- Either candidate says the word "interventionism"

- Either candidate talks about the obvious contradiction inherent when a government that takes away our liberty at home claims it's concerned with protecting liberty overseas

- Either candidate pledges to end all foreign aid, or pledges to continue it and then offers an intelligent and logical defense of the practice

- Either candidate quotes the Founding Fathers' philosophy on warfare

- Either candidate, rather than simply assert our duty to "protect democracy" all over the world, actually offers a sound philosophical and strategic justification for the idea

- Either candidate says anything remotely insightful at any point about anything

By now your beer should be flat, you haven't taken a single sip and you are still tragically lucid. Sorry about that.
-------------

If your goal is to get shitfaced, I would recommend chugging a beer every time you hear these Words:

Israel

Regime

Nuclear weapons (regarding Iran)

Terrorism

al queda

Brave men and women in uniform

American values

Jihad

I definite recommend drinking light beer. Otherwise, it will probably get ugly.

Beautiful....and frowarded. :D
 
Back
Top