The 'War On Narco-Terrorism' Is The New 'War On Terrorism'...And Will End Just As Badly

Brian4Liberty

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 13, 2007
Messages
64,248

The 'War On Narco-Terrorism' Is The New 'War On Terrorism'...And Will End Just As Badly




"The new US "war on narco-terrorism" in Latin America will enrich the coffers of the military-industrial complex and will create much death and destruction in the countries the US government decides to "liberate," but in the end the result will be failure...and that's just fine with the neocons. Also today: US Ambassador to NATO says $2 billion more in weapons in the pipeline for Ukraine."
 
I would say that "narco terrorism" would generally require an act of terrorism to justify the use of that phrase

But I don't want to encourage Israel into doing anything of that nature
 
This is about border security, something Ron Paul used to believe in, keeping chemical poison from entering our country and killing our people. If Trump goes to war for regime change in Venezuela, I'll change my tune, but I don't think he will.
 
This is about border security, something Ron Paul used to believe in, keeping chemical poison from entering our country and killing our people. If Trump goes to war for regime change in Venezuela, I'll change my tune, but I don't think he will.

Regime change is the only way forward and its what many Venezulan people want.

We tried to do it bloodless and told the Maduro regime to transfer power peacefully.

We can't let foreign powers prop up puppet dictators in our hemisphere.

This sort of doctrine goes back to Monroe. We will not allow a proxy war to be waged against us and we will remove that potential.

An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
 
We can't let foreign powers prop up puppet dictators in our hemisphere.

Easy for you to say. Bots can't smoke Havana cigars anyway, so what do you care?

But the fact remains, we can, we did. We fucked around with Batista and we found out. We're still here. The only part of it that has done us any real harm is all the corn syrup we've consumed since.
 
Easy for you to say. Bots can't smoke Havana cigars anyway, so what do you care?

But the fact remains, we can, we did, we're still here.

We actually propped up Cuba's regime intentionally.

We could have toppled it but didn't. It was supposed to serve as an example of a failed system so that other countries wouldn't copy it.

Demoralization is how we defeated the Soviet Union.

They wanted to drink that sweet sweet Pepsi cola and wear blue jeans.

It would probably work against Cuba if the detectors weren't allowed to swim here and their kids couldn't become citizens.

The people who would normally rebel against their government do so by leaving the country.

Venezuela did that too pretty much all at once 1/3 of their country ran away.

They tried to rebel and a foreign power propped up their regime.

So its a failed state and we don't want a North Korea in our hemisphere.
 
This is about border security, something Ron Paul used to believe in, keeping chemical poison from entering our country and killing our people. If Trump goes to war for regime change in Venezuela, I'll change my tune, but I don't think he will.
:rolleyes: Last time I checked Venezuela doesn't share a border with the U.S. And the fentynal is NOT coming from Venezuela. This is about oil.
 
Last edited:
We could have toppled it but didn't. It was supposed to serve as an example of a failed system so that other countries wouldn't copy it.

Machines are rewriting our history now.

It would probably work against Cuba if the detectors weren't allowed to swim here and their kids couldn't become citizens.

Why don't you have your detector go for a swim? Shorting it out could do you a world of good.
 
Machines are rewriting our history now.



Why don't you have your detector go for a swim? Shorting it out could do you a world of good.

Its not rewriting history.

Thats the way the CIA used to operate in the old days.

Its called controlled opposition.

When you have hegemony thats the kind of stuff you do.

You do it because people don't know good ideas from bad ideas unless there is a clear example of the bad idea in plain sight.

If there were no historical examples of communisms failures people wouldn't know why having a free system is worth the price you pay to keep it- as Benjamin Franklin said its a republic if you can keep it.
 
This is about oil.
And more importantly, the U.S. Dollar.

Isn’t it funny how all the pariah nations targeted for regime change operations by our nation’s wholly corrupted national security apparatus in recent history have dared challenge the USD as the world’s reserve currency?

Libyan Oil, Gold, and Qaddafi: The Strange Email Sidney Blumenthal Sent Hillary Clinton In 2011…

“Blood For Oil” has aways been a misnomer. “Blood For Greenbacks” would be a more apt description of these wars of perpetual Empire.




aa7tug.jpg
 
And more importantly, the U.S. Dollar.

Isn’t it funny how all the pariah nations targeted for regime change operations by our nation’s wholly corrupted national security apparatus in recent history have dared challenge the USD as the world’s reserve currency?

Libyan Oil, Gold, and Qaddafi: The Strange Email Sidney Blumenthal Sent Hillary Clinton In 2011…

“Blood For Oil” has aways been a misnomer. “Blood For Greenbacks” would be a more apt description of these wars of perpetual Empire.




aa7tug.jpg

The Russians want to rule the world its not anything new.

Russia since the Soviet Era with Stalin wanted a different world order.

The FDR vision where there are nations of the world doesn't coexist with the Czar vision where they get to rule other countries in their "sphere of influence"

Its not really funny because they starved millions of people to death under communism to try to achieve it.

Unless you think eating your grandparents to survive is funny.

Hahahahahahaha
 
The Russians want to rule the world its not anything new.

Russia’s death-rate has been exceeding it’s birth-rate since the collapse of the USSR. And Texas has a bigger economy than Russia. Yet we are supposed to believe Russia wants to rule the world? It is a neocon fantasy.
 
Russia’s death-rate has been exceeding it’s birth-rate since the collapse of the USSR. And Texas has a bigger economy than Russia. Yet we are supposed to believe Russia wants to rule the world? It is a neocon fantasy.

You have a very western way of viewing civilization.

They don't look at the world in terms of nations. They aren't nationalists.

Thats not how eastern civilizations view things.

Thats not how the Soviet Empire worked.

What language did they speak in the Soviet Union?

They spoke Russian in all of those soviet states.

They consider the historical countries of all of the soviet union countries as historical Russia.

They still consider corners of territory inside countries like Kazakhstan part of Russia because they are ethnically Russians.

They still consider people outside of Russia even who live in the United States who are ethnically Russian part of "Russia".

It doesn't matter how rich and how many donuts their country can buy what matters is power.

That means when they install a puppet regime in South America like Venezuala they can use asymmetric tactics to cause tremendous damage to our country.

Destabilizing the region and causing millions of people to flood into our borders and drain our resources doesn't cost a lot of money.

They just have to bribe some really corrupt people in the region with a few billion dollars and some guns.
 
THREAD:

 
Back
Top